by Jim Tankersley
A pair of President-elect Barack Obama's key environmental appointees are appearing before a Senate panel this morning - and perhaps set to shed light on the details of some of the new administration's plans to combat global warming.
We expect to hear questions this morning about if and how Lisa Jackson, the former top environmental official in New Jersey now nominated to head the Environmental Protection Agency, plans to use the Clean Air Act to regulate carbon emissions. We expect to hear questions about the administration's broader climate-change plans for Los Angeles Deputy Mayor Nancy Sutley, nominated to lead the White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), the top Republican on the Senate Environment and Public Works committee and a vocal critic of proposed global warming efforts, told Jackson and Brown in his opening statement that in coming weeks he will push aggressively to learn more about the administration's plans for the Clean Air Act and other methods to regulate emissions.
"I have serious concerns about the timing and troubling implications that further regulation could have on our already fragile economy," Inhofe said in remarks prepared for delivery.
But other early indications - from Jackson and Sutley's prepared statements, and from the opening remarks by Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), who chairs committee - are that a more fundamental issue could dominate this hearing: a repudiation of President Bush's environmental policies and the promise of a sea change under Obama.
"EPA has hurt the American people, made them less safe, these last 8 years," Boxer said. A moment later, she added: "I am looking for a renewed commitment to EPA's mission. Nothing more, nothing less."
In a pointed jab at Bush, both Jackson and Sutley pledged in their prepared opening statements to put science over politics in federal environmental policy-making. Jackson, a longtime EPA staff member before she moved to state government, promised in her statement that "if I am confirmed, political appointees will not compromise the integrity of EPA's technical experts to advance particular regulatory outcomes."
Sutley also promised to put science first in her prepared remarks. She echoed Obama's statements that "a strong, sustainable economy and a healthy environment can and must go hand in hand." And she pledged to fight global warming and boost clean energy.
Committee members range widely on their views about warming, the EPA and the appropriate role of the federal government in environmental policy. That should make for some spirited questioning. Stay tuned.









Comments
I could care less whether we keep the '52 year tradition' of a Kennedy in the Senate. But as far as SOME of the Kennedy kids go--I'd have liked to have seen obama appoint Bobby's kid to the EPA slot.
Posted by: Where's RFK JR of River Keeper? | January 14, 2009 11:35 AM
Here we go again with the global warming hysteria!
Let's review scientists and their prediction of the destruction of civilization...
1895...imminent ice age.
1920's...global warming.
1970's...back to the ice age.
1980's...back to global warming.
Does anyone see a pattern here? It's winter and right now you couldn't find Al Gore with a search warrant.
Paulo
Posted by: Paulo | January 14, 2009 11:53 AM
It sure is refreshing to see competent appointees, heading to the Senate for their confirmation !! Instead of those hacks, President Bush foisted on America, with the predictable results: Disasters, of historic proportions !! President-elect Obama continues to do the right thing, hire the honest, honorable personnel, who know what they are doing !! We have had enough with the cronies, the incompetents, the ideologues, the zealots and, of course, the NeoCons, which President Bush stacked our government !! Root them out and then, show them the door. They are there for one reason, obstruct the will of the people, who shouted: Change !! Thus, we have President-elect Obama !!
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME, ALIVE AND WHOLE. NOW.
Posted by: Don Fitzgerald, Chicago | January 14, 2009 11:55 AM
Some of the coldest weather on record in North American, Europe and China for the second consecutive year and the global warming enthusiasts continue their prattle. Last year the global warming enthusiasts blamed the cold winter weather on La Nina. There is no La Nina to blame this year. Yet, here we are and winter weather records set all over the place. Snow in New Orleans, Houston and Las Vegas. Even in LA and Malibu this winter. Temps below -60 in Alaska. New records set in Minnesota. Chicago already has had more snow than it typically gets in a winter. So far this winter is the 20th coldest out of 140 winter records. Yep, it's global warming. Or is it climate change???
Posted by: John D | January 14, 2009 6:44 PM
The stage has already been set by changing "global warming" to "climate change" so that from now on whatever happens to the weather patterns, enviromentalists will be covered. Shameless
Posted by: Kathy | January 15, 2009 7:46 AM