Obama: Republican Commerce sec'y?: The Swamp
The Swamp
Chicago Tribune

Could make room for another Democratic senator and 60-seat bloc.

Posted January 30, 2009 8:15 AM
Judd Gregg.jpg

Sen. Judd Gregg of New Hampshire. AP photo.

The Swamp

by Peter Nicholas

Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) is under consideration for the Commerce secretary post in President Obama's cabinet, raising the prospect that Democrats could gain a filibuster-proof majority of 60 seats in the Senate, according to two officials familiar with the selection process.

Gregg, who faces re-election in 2010, is one of several people under consideration for the remaining cabinet post for which Obama has no nominee. New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson had been picked for the Commerce job, but he pulled out earlier in the month amid a grand jury probe into a state contract award.

Since then, Obama has been casting about for a replacement but has not settled on anyone, according to White House aides. On Thursday, a Republican Senate aide and a Democratic official confirmed that Gregg had emerged as a candidate.

Gregg's office declined comment.

From a political perspective, the selection could prove a gift to the Democrats. If Gregg were to resign from the Senate, his replacement would be chosen by New Hampshire's Democratic governor, John Lynch.

Were Lynch to give the seat to a fellow Democrat, that would boost the party's count in the Senate to 59, including the two independents who caucus with Democrats. And if Minnesota Democrat Al Franken ultimately joined the Senate, the number would grow to 60--the threshold needed to deprive Republicans of the ability to use filibusters to block legislation. The 2008 Senate race in Minnesota is still in dispute.

With a 60-vote majority in the Senate, coupled with a comfortable Democratic margin in the House, Obama could push through his agenda with a minimum of Republican resistance.

For that reason, some analysts were doubtful that Gregg would take the job. He would come under strong pressure from fellow Republicans to stay put.

The GOP aide, who requested anonymity because he is not authorized to speak publicly on the matter, suggested that a deal could be worked out in which Lynch agrees to appoint a Republican successor.

"There might be an agreement reached where the Democratic governor does not appoint a Democratic replacement,'' the aide said.

Accepting the post would spare Gregg a potentially difficult re-election campaign in 2010.

Last fall, registered Democrats in New Hampshire outnumbered Republicans for the first time since the state began keeping records, said Ray Buckley, chairman of the state Democratic Party. New Hampshire voters not only chose Barack Obama over the Republican presidential nominee in November, but they voted out of office another prominent political son, then-Sen. John Sununu (R-N.H.), whose father had been governor and later White House chief of staff.

``In modern-day New Hampshire, no Republican has an easy election,'' Buckley said.

Amy Walter, editor in chief of The Hotline, a daily news service devoted to politics, countered that Gregg would be a formidable candidate.

"It's clear to me that New Hampshire is trending blue. But he is in a much stronger position than his former colleague, John Sununu, in 2008.. .. .. . There are certainly Republicans who have been able to figure out how to win despite unfavorable headwinds,'' Walter said.

Gregg, who is serving his third term in the Senate, is conservative on trade and tax issues, which has won him strong marks from the business community.

He is also a conservative on social issues, which could be prove an obstacle in confirmation hearings. He fought legislation in the last Congress to outlaw job discrimination against gay people.

He is considered a tough legislative player who provided reliable support for President Bush, though he once admitted to some doubts about Bush's troop build up in Iraq.

There is no ambiguity about his business record. He received a 100 percent score from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for his votes in 2006, while earning just 7 percent from the AFL-CIO.

Tom Hamburger of the Washington Bureau contributed to this report

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

Why work toward bi-partisan cabinet appointments. It seems they don't really want that.


Run for your life - the Peanut Butter makers are taking over at Commerce. .............


http://thefiresidepost.com/2009/01/29/republican-peanut-butter/


YUUUUUCCCCCK!
Isn't this like asking Herbert Hoover to guide the economy and pass union legislation?
Of course-the article only talks about the horse race.


Bill R., Republicans DO want bipartisan politics. It's just that they don't agree with what "bipartisan" really means. To Dems, "bipartisan" means both sides work on issues and Republicans get input as to what should be happening. It also means that sometimes the best person for the job really IS a Republican, and it's fine for Republicans to work within a Democratic administration. To Repubs, it means that Democrats apologize for winning the election (actually, they should be apologizing pretty much just for BEING) and humbly back out of Washington (I'm not sure if they're supposed to bow and genuflect as they retreat or not) to allow the Republicans to claim their rightful thrones, where they can do what they want -- as they did up to 2007 -- with NO input, assistance or unnecessary backtalk from anybody who's not a Republican, thank-you-very-much-indeed.


Op109, there is actually no proof whatsoever for this statement of yours:

"Bill R., Republicans DO want bipartisan politics."

When have Republicans been bi-partisan in the last eight years???!!!??? I can't think of a time.

Elections have consequences.

Because of the GOP's refusal to be bi-partisan under Bush, they lost the Presidency, they lost the Senate, and they lost the House.

Elections have consequences.
Democrats won.
Get use to it.

There is no "requirement" for them to listen to a darn thing Republicans have to say.

Republicans had their chance at running the country all by themselves and they ran us into a ditch. And, while running America into a ditch, they shut out the minority Democrats at every turn.

I respect Obama for his attempts at bi-partisanship, but I hope Congress treats Republicans like they treated Democrats -- Republicans should be completely ignored.


Jan, Repugs have been absolutely bipartisan ever since 1996, exactly as I've noted above. "Bipartisan" means they do whatever they want and we're supposed to shut up and do what they tell us. And that's exactly the kind of "bipartisan" they plan to continue until the day Jesus comes to Earth and personally escorts all Republicans straight to Heaven.
.
As just one example, before Republicans took over the majority of Congress, they were irked that legislature coming up for discussion would often be worded to disallow amendments (56% of bills, the year Republicans took over), and they vowed to do better -- an admirable goal, I think. However, under Republican control, as much as 76% of bills were introduced prohibiting amendment. Republicans cut House and Senate Dems out of committee discussion when bills were argued. Republicans routinely declared bills to be "emergency" measures (57% in 2003) often just after adding drastic changes, then required votes with as little as 30 minutes' notice (as opposed to the required 48 hours, per House rules). With little or no time to read the latest version of a bill and no input as to what bills contained, Dems were literally required to vote on something they had no idea what they were voting for or against.
.
Pure, good-natured "bipartisanship," done in the spirit of cooperation and regard for the greater good.
.
Clear things up for ya, I hope?


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "u" in the field below:

Barack Obama

Latest polls

Features

Cartoon

Joe Fournier

Cartoon

The Lowe- Down

Cartoon

Editorial cartoons

McCain

Presidential trivia