Obama's bipartisan bid for stimulus: The Swamp
The Swamp
Chicago Tribune
Posted January 27, 2009 7:55 AM
The Swamp

by Janet Hook and Peter Nicholas

President Obama travels to the Capitol today to meet with House and Senate Republicans, the latest in a series of high-profile efforts to reach across the aisle and make good on his campaign promise to swim against the partisan tide that has flooded Washington for decades.

So far, his gestures have shown few signs success, as Republicans have continued to snipe at his signature initiative--legislation to stimulate the economy--and even question the sincerity of his efforts. In the stimulus bill's first two tests last week, it passed two committees without a single Republican vote.

But whether or not he picks up support from Republican lawmakers, Obama has already accomplished one important political aim: He is now winning over more Republican voters than he did on election day--a phenomenon that, if it continues, could strengthen the president's hand on Capitol Hill.

``You don't calculate the impact of his effort in terms of the number of votes he gets on the stimulus bill,'' said Bill McInturff, a GOP pollster who worked for Obama's rival Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). ``You calculate it based on how he is perceived by Republicans around the country, and it looks to be substantially more positive.''

Still, it will be a blow to Obama if he ends up as Bill Clinton did in 1993, when the president's cornerstone economic initiative, which included a politically risky tax increase, passed with no support from Republicans. For Obama, failure to win Republican support for the stimulus bill could be a bad omen as he tries to build bipartisan coalitions later in the year on even more divisive issues, such as health care and energy legislation.

``The stimulus bill is going to lay the predicate for future cooperation,'' said Vin Weber, a Republican former House member who is now a lobbyist. ``If this policy is dictated on a party-line vote, it's hard to imagine that anything else will be bipartisan.''

See the full report on Obama's stimulus lobbying in Tribune newspapers and here in the Swamp:

For Republicans, the economic debate is the first test of how they will play the weak political hand dealt them by the 2008 elections. They have proven willing to oppose his stimulus plan so far, but some Republicans worry about the risk of confronting a popular president facing an economic crisis at a time when their party has less power than in more than a decade.

Obama's meeting on Capitol Hill today came at the invitation of House and Senate Republicans, who said they were responding to his claim that he wants to hear their ideas. It marks the first time the new president has been to Capitol Hill since he was sworn in.

But Obama has been working the Republican side of the aisle for weeks. He has made phone calls not just to GOP leaders but also to rank-and-file members, among them conservative Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and moderate Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine). He named a Republican, former Illinois congressman Ray LaHood, to be secretary of Transportation.

Obama's chief of staff, former Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), is a master of Capitol Hill politicking and was dispatched soon after the election to meet GOP leaders. He has even given out his cell phone number to Republican lawmakers.

Emanuel is hosting two moderate Pennsylvania Republicans--Reps. Charlie Dent and Jim Gerlach--along with several other Republicans at a White House dinner on Tuesday night.

Dent and Gerlach are members of the Tuesday Group, which includes several dozen moderate Republicans. Neither will be an easy sell on the stimulus plan. Dent said Monday he would likely oppose the bill as it stands, because he is not convinced the package is designed to spend money quickly enough to stimulate the economy. Gerlach appears to be leaning in the same direction.

In putting together his stimulus bill, Obama had an eye on winning Republican support when he included several business tax breaks.

"There are already provisions in this bill relating to net operating loss, tax cuts and other small-business tax cuts that are directly related to suggestions that Republicans have given the economic team, the president of the United States and other members of Congress,'' White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in a briefing Monday.

Obama initially asked that 40% of the bill's pricetag be allotted to tax cuts, a portion large enough that many Republicans were pleased and some Democrats angered. But when the bill failed nonetheless to win over many Republicans, Obama backed down and settled for allotting only one-third of the package to tax cuts.

That is the template that Republicans most worry about: However willing Obama may be to compromise with them, his fellow Democrats in Congress will pull him to the left. Some Republicans believe the White House efforts so far amount to empty stagecraft, noting that their efforts have been thwarted in the House to reduce the pricetag of the bill and give more weight to tax cuts.

``So far, it's been a pretty partisan exercise, and we're waiting for the bipartisan part,'' said Don Stewart, spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).

A House Republican aide said that at the meeting Obama held at the White House Friday with congressional Republicans, there was no real negotiation. Each side presented its case, but there was no give-and-take that might have resulted in more Republicans agreeing to support the bill, the aide said.

One measure of the stimulus bill's political prospects will come Tuesday, as the Senate Appropriations and Finance committees meet to draft its spending and tax portions It is not clear whether the results will live up to Obama's call for bipartisanship.

``It's all optics until we see actions,'' said Kyle Downey, a spokesman for Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.).

But outside Capitol Hill, Republicans seem to like what they seen. In a Gallup Poll over the first four days of Obama's presidency, 43% of Republicans approved of the job he was doing. Overall, 68% of those surveyed--including Democrats, Republicans and independents--approved of Obama. That is the highest initial job approval rating for any president since Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Josh Drobnyk of the Tribune Washington Bureau/Allentown Morning Call contributed.


Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

You see, The Republicans are already being partisan. They have no intentions of being bi-partisan one bit! The only way the repugs will be bi=partisan is if its about a bill that they want period! I hate these people so much after what they've done to our country they have no right governing in this country! It will be the Clinton years all over again with stalling tactics, money wasting probes into private matters and cry baby tantrums from the right. But if this is the case we can rest assured that President Obama will overcome these games and create an economy as good as Clinton did!


The Democrat's "stimulus" bill will be voted upon by lawmakers, none of whom will have ever even READ the massive 1500 pages of bill and reports, most of the spending of which will take place long after the economy needs "stimulating."

A fraud from beginning to end. Pork from beginning to end. And a massive raid on the taxpayer's wallets.

BTW, if anyone (including Swamp journalists) wishes to actually read the "stimulus" bill, the text and accompanying reports is posted at www.readthestimulus.org.


The best thing President Obama can do, is to pursue their support, without surrendering his goals and aspirations. The Republicans were notorious, in excluding the minority, the Democrats, when they ran Congress. It was outrageous, the way they excluded the Democrats. Today, is supposed to be a new day. We shall see, when it comes to the Republicans positions on President Obama's economic package, whether the Republicans will be supportive, or obstructionist. I see them being the latter, only because, for them to support President Obama's initiative, would be a repudiation of the last 8 years and I don't think they are ready to do that, just yet !!
I do give the President, a shout out, for even going there, though it could be, a waste of time. I think they have dug their heels in, and will try to stymie President Obama, every chance they are given. After all, you lose an election, you are capable of being a Bush-McCain Republican, that is about it. Until you come to your senses, and we know how slow those kinds of Republicans are !!
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME, ALIVE AND WHOLE. NOW.


The left's definition of "bipartisan" is Republicans caving in and giving Obama whatever he wants because they're too gutless to stand up against this "Great Leap Forward" toward his socialist utopia.


We are already there, the socialist utopia, thanks to your fearless ex-leader, President Bush. In effect, he already has nationaized the Banking system. Thanks, former President Bush, we needed that !! Now, go and enjoy that largesse you will receive for your " good " work, while in our White House !!
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME, ALIVE AND WHOLE. NOW.


"Dissent" Bruce and the "country last" repugs have no credibility---it's their policies that got us where we are:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/26/opinion/26krugman.html?em

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/opinion/27herbert.html?em


The bank bailout and Medicare Part D were Bush's two biggest sell-outs. They were a grievous betrayal of free market principles. But that doesn't justify Obama compounding that error exponentially, as he intends to do. Obama is intentionally trying to transform this country into a socialist nanny state like France or Italy. The problem is that France and Italy have been learning the hard way that it doesn't work any better for them than it did for the Soviets or the Cubans or the North Koreans. Even the Chinese are gradually gravitating back toward free markets because they have been forced to acknowledge, however grudgingly, that socialism and command economies just don't work. Liberalism may be grounded in warm-fuzzies and good intentions, but it's the results that count. And liberalism ALWAYS results in failure.


And liberalism ALWAYS results in failure.

Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspirator | January 27, 2009 11:29 AM

Really? And the last 8 years were run by .....????

Since Social Security is a Socialist program, I guess you wont be collecting out of your base beliefs right? Ha! Didnt think so!


The left's definition of "bipartisan" is Republicans caving in and giving Obama whatever he wants because they're too gutless to stand up against this "Great Leap Forward" toward his socialist utopia.

Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspirator | January 27, 2009 9:38 AM

Yeah. Just like the first six years of the Bush administration when the rubber stamp Republican Congress gave Mr. Bush blank check after blank check after blank check. Didn't matter than, eh.
Socialist??You don't know what social is and probably never will. You are a whiner. The GOP lost the last 2 elections, badly. It's time for a much needed change. If you don't like, move overseas to a socialist country.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "i" in the field below:

Barack Obama

Latest polls

Features

Cartoon

Joe Fournier

Cartoon

The Lowe- Down

Cartoon

Editorial cartoons

McCain

Presidential trivia