by David G. Savage
Though Roland Burris had some trouble being admitted to the U.S. Senate, he will not be easily expelled now that he has arrived.
It takes a vote of two-thirds of the senators to oust a member, and the last senators to be formally expelled were charged with supporting the rebels during the Civil War.
"It's a collegial body that doesn't like to police its members," said Donald A. Ritchie, the Senate's associate historian. "It prefers to leave that to the voters and to the courts."
But a veteran Washington campaign lawyer said that Burris (D-Ill.) may not benefit from the Senate's usual protectiveness toward its members, and that he could face strong pressure from within the Senate to resign.
"He doesn't have a reservoir of goodwill. He is new to the institution, and he arrived under questionable circumstances," attorney Jan W. Baran said.
Burris was appointed in December by then-Illinois Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich to fill President Obama's former seat. Blagojevich made the appointment while facing charges that he had attempted to sell the seat; the Democratic governor has since been impeached and forced out of office. Illinois Republicans and Democrats have pressed for an investigation of Burris as he has changed his characterization of his actions relating to the appointment.
"He has a lot of explaining to do now," Baron said. "If he had testified to all those contacts with people close to Gov. Blagojevich, I don't think he would have been seated.
"They have got to feel snookered, at the very least," Baron said of Senate leaders.
See the rest of the story on Burris and the Senate in Tribune newspapers and comment here in the Swamp:
The Senate Ethics Committee has wide powers to investigate members for actions "unbecoming" of a senator. It has been busy over the last two years, and its probes can put political pressure on a senator. Rarely, however, does the committee go much further and impose a public punishment.
"Disciplinary actions by the Senate are few and far between," said Kenneth Gross, a Washington lawyer who specializes in ethics.
For example, after Sen. Larry E. Craig (R-Idaho) pleaded guilty in 2007 to disorderly conduct in an airport men's room, the ethics committee undertook an investigation. Last February, it closed the case by issuing a "public letter of admonition." By then, Craig had announced that he was not seeking reelection.
In May, the committee dismissed a complaint against Sen. David Vitter (R-La.), whose name appeared on a prostitute's client list. The panel noted that Vitter had not been convicted of a crime, and said that the "conduct at issue did not involve use of public office for improper purposes."
It also investigated Sens. Pete V. Domenici (R-N.M.) for calling a U.S. attorney about a pending case involving a Democratic candidate on the eve of an election, and Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), who was convicted on several corruption charges. Domenici retired from the Senate, and Alaska's voters retired Stevens.
Still, the threat of expulsion can pressure embattled senators to resign. In 1995, Sen. Bob Packwood (R-Ore.) was facing expulsion when he resigned after a long investigation into of charges that he had sexually harassed a series of female employees of the Senate.
Sen. Harrison Williams (D-N.J.) was convicted of corruption in the Abscam investigation and resigned in 1982 on the eve of a vote by the full Senate to expel him.
The Senate may impose other public penalties that can ruin a politician's career. In one famous example, Sen. Joseph McCarthy (R-Wis.) was censured by the Senate in 1954, which ended his reign as leader of the anti-communist movement.
Burris' case looks to be unique because he is a newcomer to the Senate, Gross said. "He has been there only for days, and he arrived with two strikes against him," Gross said. "So he's in a weak position to defend himself."
The ethics committee will probably launch an investigation into what Burris said and did before his appointment by Blagojevich. But Gross said the embattled senator would have a chance to answer the charges.
"You have to give him due process," Gross said. "He has a fighting spirit and says he has done nothing wrong. So this could take a while."





Comments
Burris needs to go. If you have 4 version s of the truth..........you need to go!
Posted by: bill r. | February 19, 2009 8:00 AM
I do not care so much about the legal BS about what constitutes perjury, but Burris mislead the Blago impeachment committee and failed to tell the whole truth. He skirted the basic intent of the questions while other Il. Dems. on the committee gave him cover by objecting to follow up questions seeking to clarify his answers. And to top that, the Democrat chairwoman, being a typical political hack of our integrity deficient speaker, hid the facts of his obfuscation from the voters. The political dishonesty of our state has spread like a malignant cancer. Obama and the WH gang are not immune either, as they have never really pushed for right of a special election. This tumor continues to grow and spread, causing much pain for the corrupt Il. Democratic party. It needs to be cut out and examined for all its pathology. Keep sniffing you Swamp bloodhounds!
Posted by: Bubba Porter | February 19, 2009 8:23 AM
Good "diagnosis" BP.
Posted by: Flo | February 19, 2009 9:58 AM
Burris holds the Race Card and the Democrats don't want to mess with The Black Core .Democrats. Might be some saber rattling like Sen Durbin.
PS- Wonder what Obama opinionis is?
Posted by: Inky | February 19, 2009 10:35 AM
Hang 'em high, you good, old constitutionalists !! Ride those bill of rights, out on a rail !! Illinois, the odious Land of Lynchings !!
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME, ALIVE AND WHOLE. NOW.
Posted by: Don Fitzgerald, America | February 19, 2009 10:38 AM
Burris is no different than any other democrat politician in Illinois...they're all corrupt....including Obama and his shady land deal.
Paulo
Posted by: Paulo | February 19, 2009 10:58 AM
Again, this is something that could have been investigated BEFORE Burris was seated, but the Libune and its in-the-tank writers (particularly Eric Zorn), insisted that the senate just HAD to seat Burris, who was appointed by an arrested and charged governor. You're doin' one heckuva job there, media watchdogs!
Posted by: Jeff | February 19, 2009 1:13 PM
Today Vitter called for Burris' resignation. That's rich.
I admire Vitter's ability to use family values as a vehicle to garner support while frequenting prostitutes, and calling for the resignation of others when he should have resigned himself.
It's equivalent to Newt Gingrinch excoriating Clinton for infidelity while Gingrinch himself was cheating on his wife, or Jesse Jackson doing something similar. Burris as well.
Most people don't have the degree of mental flexibility needed to be a complete moral hypocrite while acting as if nothing is wrong with what they are doing and saying. I also have no doubt that they sleep fine at night, being easily able to rationalize that what they say is more important than how they behave.
That's why I'm a nobody who works to make ends meet, and these guys rose to positions of great power, wealth and influence. This is an important lesson for children today on how to get ahead in the world.
Posted by: billp | February 24, 2009 4:22 PM