by Josh Meyer
The Pentagon has concluded that the military detention center at Guantanamo Bay meets the standards for humane treatment of detainees established in the Geneva Conventions accords.
In a report for President Obama on conditions at Guantanamo, the Pentagon recommended some changes, primarily providing some of the most troublesome inmates with more group recreation and opportunities for prayer, according to the administration official, who has read the report and spoke on the condition of anonymity, citing its confidential nature.
The lengthy report was done by a top Navy official, Adm. Patrick M. Walsh, and done in response to Obama's Jan. 22 executive order to close the facility within a year.
The report, which has not officially been released, "has been completed and will be delivered to the White House in accordance with the president's executive order,'' said a Pentagon spokesman, Cmdr. Jeffrey D. Gordon.
Some of the most dangerous inmates at the naval facility in Cuba have been prohibited from meeting with other prisoners for prayer or socialization, instead kept in their cells for as long as 23 hours a day. That includes alleged Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and other self-styled Al Qaeda leaders charged with overseeing the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, who are likely to be affected by the new proposed reforms.
Obama has criticized the detention center, and human rights advocates have condemned it as violating the Geneva Conventions, which were established to protect the rights of those held in detention by other countries, including in times of war.
See the rest of the report on Guantanamo and the Pentagon's review in Tribune newspapers and here in the Swamp:
The administration official said that the report's primary conclusions supported the Department of Defense's longstanding contention that Guantanamo was in compliance with the international conventions, including Article 3, which requires the humane treatment of prisoners taken in unconventional armed conflicts such as the war on terrorism.
``The bottom line is that the report found that Guantanamo is in compliance with the Geneva conventions, which we have maintained for several years. So the report essentially validated our procedures and processes,'' said the administration official.
Human rights groups are planning to take issue with Walsh's finding that Guantanamo complies with Geneva requirements. The Center for Constitutional Rights, a group of attorneys who represent detainees, planned a news conference early next week.
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. Friday appointed a senior Justice Department official, Matthew Olsen, to head an inter-agency task force looking into how to close Guantanamo and deal with the more than 200 men being detained there.
Meanwhile, the Obama administration said Friday it is not ready to extend legal rights to the prisoners held at the U.S. air base in Afghanistan.
Instead, an administration lawyer told a judge who is reviewing the issue that the government, for now, "adheres to the previously articulated position" of the Bush administration.
Last year, the Supreme Court ruled that the prisoners held at Guantanamo had the right to challenge the case against them in a federal court. The justices said these prisoners had been held for years in a prison that is, for all practical purposes, part of United States' territory.
It was not clear, however, whether this ruling was limited to Guantanamo only, or could be extended to other long-term prisoners in the war against terror.
Lawyers who represent several men held at the Bagram prison in Afghanistan said their clients were entitled to legal rights as well.
Bush administration lawyers disagreed. They said that the U.S. did not exercise sovereign control in Afghanistan, and the prisoners were held in a "theatre of war."
When the new administration took power, U.S. District Judge John Bates said he would give its officials a month to decide whether they wanted to change its policy toward the Bagram prisoners.
Michael Hertz, an acting assistant attorney general, filed a two-line statement with the judge Friday declining his offer.
David Savage contributed to this report.









Comments
This is a surprise! NOT... Obama sold naive Americans a sack of goods when running for President and they bought it hook line and sinker.
He's going to fix the economy..."no we can't"
He's going to close Gitmo..."no we can't"
He's going to bring Iraq to a close..."no we can't"
He's going to pass out money to everyone who helped him get elected..."YES WE CAN"
Posted by: Bessie | February 21, 2009 9:12 AM
Big mistake announcing the Gitmo closing so prematurely. Release these terrorists and they go back to killing and terror. And what about justice for the families of those Americans murdered? Denied because he pandered for votes. That is a unconscionable use of power. Obama can not even beg our so-called allies to accept them, why should they carry the risk of attack by housing these civil liberties deficient gentlemen. It also carries a great psychological fear for terrorist, knowing they may well end up as guests. He always said he would use every"tool". If they come to the American mainland he risks local opposition as well as endangering those communities. He should have deferred judgement and blamed Bush for this quagmire. Announce that there are no viable options, quietly in a meno, and keep it open. Another bussing, I'm afraid.
Posted by: Bubba Porter | February 21, 2009 9:34 AM
The Pentagon?
I also suggest calling your local real estate agent to find out how wonderful the housing market is.
Posted by: bill r. | February 21, 2009 10:48 AM
Bull,
.
This is BO's pentagon, do you think they would lie. can't flatliners trust the pentagon when one of their own is the commander-in-chief?
Posted by: Terry | February 21, 2009 12:25 PM
Bubba, the exec order to close gitmo is not a big deal. He can extend, revise or rescind it anytime he wants. Its just another illusory promise from Obama to appease his more naïve followers.
Speaking of those naïve followers who bang the drum of closing gitmo, I am assuming your objection is with holding terror suspects without charges, lawyers, etc. You do realize that gitmo is not the only such detention facility right? And they will remain in use after gitmo is closed. That's what happens when you attack a building instead of the underlying policy. Only the stupid are appeased and the same policies continue, whether Bush or Obama is in office.
Posted by: Herbie H. | February 21, 2009 2:33 PM
Bull,
.
This is BO's pentagon, do you think they would lie. can't flatliners trust the pentagon when one of their own is the commander-in-chief?
Posted by: Terry | February 21, 2009 12:25 PM
Jerry(Lewis).......How nice of you to give everything to Obama. If only you hadn't screwed the pooch so much before handing it over. If I remember correctly.....the CIA which belonged to Bush said there were WMDs in Iraq. So you're saying the CIA didn't lie to Bush. Then did Bush lie?
Posted by: bill r. | February 21, 2009 4:01 PM
Hussein, you can't say it's Rumsfeld or Cheney this time. These are the other Hussein's handpicked people saying this. So to recap, the UN says Iran has nukes and Obama's pentagon says Guantanamo is human. Can't say I disagree with them on either count. So glad all that "change" was just BS.
Posted by: Jeff | February 21, 2009 5:02 PM
So Jeff...let's continue our "adult" conversation. What "handpicked" people by Obama are in the UN or the pentagon? Not that I would be surprised about Iran....after all that diplomatic work by Bush. I guess the cowboy effect didn't work either. What I do find laughable is someone claiming to want an "adult" conversation and then ask for change in a month that took 8 years to screw up.
Posted by: bill r. | February 21, 2009 5:52 PM
Bull,
.
Why did Clinton bomb Iraq in Dec, 1998? I guess you need a refresher on who said what about WMDs.
.
http://www.davidstuff.com/political/wmdquotes.htm
.
Note the dates also.
.
Has BO denounced the findings by the Pentagon?
Posted by: Terry | February 21, 2009 8:45 PM
I hope all you Cindy Sheehan types and other idealistic pseudo-liberals aren’t too disappointed now that your savior and his crew have started spinning excuses for Guantanamo. Next thing you know we’re going to hear that keeping Guantanamo open is a good idea, and later that keeping terrorists there is a great idea. It’s called creeping hypocrisy. It infects all governments. Get used to it.
Posted by: John W. | February 22, 2009 7:25 PM