by Mark Silva
After imploring Congress to act quickly on an economic stimulus for a nation that has lost 3.6 million jobs in its worsening recession, President Barack Obama today praised Senate leaders of both parties for reaching an accord on a roughly $800-billion package.
The plan, pared by more than $110 billion from the package that had been produced in the Senate and some $30 billion smaller than the one that has cleared the House, heads to debate on the Senate floor today.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has suggested that the Senate accord looks like $827 billion to his analysts. "Bear in mind the interest costs on either of those proposals would be $348 billion,'' he adds, "So we're really talking about a $1.1 trillion pending measure... We're looking at a $1 trillion deficit....''
Democratic Leaders hope to strike a deal between the House and Senate next week.
"Democrats and Republicans came together in the Senate and responded appropriately to the urgency this moment demands,'' Obama said today, with his weekly radio and Internet address, reiterating a message that he has repeated with increasing urgency all week - that the American people voted for action in November, not politics as usual.
"That was, after all, what last November's election was all about,'' Obama said.
The president also is warning lawmakers not to let perfection stand between them and a necessary strategy for reviving the economy.
"Legislation of such magnitude deserves the scrutiny that it's received over the last month, and it will receive more in the days to come,'' Obama said. "But we can't afford to make perfect the enemy of the absolutely necessary. The scale and scope of this plan is right. And the time for action is now.
"Because if we don't move swiftly to put this plan in motion,'' he said, repeating a warning issued all week, "our economic crisis could become a national catastrophe.''
See the video of the address above and the text below:
The president's address:
Yesterday began with some devastating news with regard to our economic crisis. But I'm pleased to say it ended on a more positive note.
In the morning, we received yet another round of alarming employment figures - the worst in more than 30 years. Another 600,000 jobs were lost in January. We've now lost more than 3.6 million jobs since this recession began.
But by the evening, Democrats and Republicans came together in the Senate and responded appropriately to the urgency this moment demands.
In the midst of our greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression, the American people were hoping that Congress would begin to confront the great challenges we face. That was, after all, what last November's election was all about.
Legislation of such magnitude deserves the scrutiny that it's received over the last month, and it will receive more in the days to come. But we can't afford to make perfect the enemy of the absolutely necessary. The scale and scope of this plan is right. And the time for action is now.
Because if we don't move swiftly to put this plan in motion, our economic crisis could become a national catastrophe. Millions of Americans will lose their jobs, their homes, and their health care. Millions more will have to put their dreams on hold.
Let's be clear: We can't expect relief from the tired old theories that, in eight short years, doubled the national debt, threw our economy into a tailspin, and led us into this mess in the first place. We can't rely on a losing formula that offers only tax cuts as the answer to all our problems while ignoring our fundamental economic challenges - the crushing cost of health care or the inadequate state of so many schools; our addiction to foreign oil or our crumbling roads, bridges, and levees.
The American people know that our challenges are great. They don't expect Democratic solutions or Republican solutions - they expect American solutions.
From the beginning, this recovery plan has had at its core a simple idea: Let's put Americans to work doing the work America needs done. It will save or create more than 3 million jobs over the next two years, all across the country - 16,000 in Maine, nearly 80,000 in Indiana - almost all of them in the private sector, and all of them jobs that help us recover today, and prosper tomorrow.
Jobs that upgrade classrooms and laboratories in 10,000 schools nationwide - at least 485 in Florida alone - and train an army of teachers in math and science.
Jobs that modernize our health care system, not only saving us billions of dollars, but countless lives.
Jobs that construct a smart electric grid, connect every corner of the country to the information superhighway, double our capacity to generate renewable energy, and grow the economy of tomorrow.
Jobs that rebuild our crumbling roads, bridges and levees and dams, so that the tragedies of New Orleans and Minneapolis never happen again.
It includes immediate tax relief for our struggling middle class in places like Ohio, where 4.5 million workers will receive a tax cut of up to $1,000. It protects health insurance and provides unemployment insurance for those who've lost their jobs. And it helps our states and communities avoid painful tax hikes or layoffs for our teachers, nurses, and first responders.
That's what is at stake with this plan: putting Americans back to work, creating transformative economic change, and making a down payment on the American Dream that serves our children and our children's children for generations to come.
Americans across this country are struggling, and they are watching to see if we're equal to the task before us. Let's show them that we are. And let's do whatever it takes to keep the promise of America alive in our time.
Thank you.





Comments
Now the question is whether the public will buy the reasoning behind the stimulus and if its actually bipartisan when only three Republicans vote for it (whether that's good policy or obstructionism won't matter...)
http://www.political-buzz.com/
Posted by: matt | February 7, 2009 9:09 AM
Forgive me if my math is incorrect....They added 5 trillion to the national debt divided by 8 years. But it seems that the republicans for the last 8 years have actually added their own stimulus to the national debt by 625 billion a year. Why would we ever listen to a party who could add 625 billion a year for 8 years and still manage to run the country into the ground? These are the last people we need to listen to.
Posted by: bill r. | February 7, 2009 9:17 AM
Can anyone explain why...after all the pork shouting....it took removing money to build schools to get this passed?
Posted by: bill r. | February 7, 2009 10:05 AM
Wait six months from now when all the greedy fraud starts when the money starts getting in the wrong hands,
Posted by: Inky | February 7, 2009 10:36 AM
Wait six months from now when all the greedy fraud starts when the money starts getting in the wrong hands,
Fifty million dollar jets will be nothing.
Posted by: Inky | February 7, 2009 10:38 AM
Would anyone buy a house at an exhorbitant price that you cannot afford just because the realtor is pushing hard to get his commision? Would anyone buy an expensive car with features that you don't actually need just because the car salesman sound very convincing?
If the answer is no, that is why so many people in this country do not approve of the spending bill President Obama is trying to push through Congress. He should have the will and the courage to stand to his own Party and cut all the crap in the bill and to present to the people of this country and the people in Congress who represent us a true stimulus bill.
If President Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Schumer, Frank, Dodd, Kennedy, et al would be spending their own wealth, their own millions of dollars, in this bill then I will say go for it. But they are spending our money, the people's money and we know by now that nothing has changed in Washington. It is politics and business as usual.
So, Obama and the Democrats might have won the election, but as the President residing in the White House, his mandate is to govern and look out for the best interest of ALL the people. This bill should not be full of pet projects to satisfy special interests and should not be used to pay off the political debts acquired by the President and the Democratic Party during the election.
Posted by: Hilda Perez | February 7, 2009 10:54 AM
Vote NO. Let the Dems. have it their way. They have the votes and should bear the responsibility. Next week they will ask for more. Bet Obama doesn't wait 5 days for us to review it either. Right on Inky!
Posted by: Bubba Porter | February 7, 2009 11:25 AM
So, Obama and the Democrats might have won the election, but as the President residing in the White House, his mandate is to govern and look out for the best interest of ALL the people. This bill should not be full of pet projects to satisfy special interests and should not be used to pay off the political debts acquired by the President and the Democratic Party during the election.
Posted by: Hilda Perez | February 7, 2009 10:54 AM
You are on the right track.
in other words political smoke screen for average American,,just like his CHANGE regarding honesty, in hiscabinet, TAX CHEATS.
How long can he Empty Suit Fellow Americans..
Posted by: Inky | February 7, 2009 12:14 PM
Vote NO. Let the Dems. have it their way. They have the votes and should bear the responsibility. Next week they will ask for more. Bet Obama doesn't wait 5 days for us to review it either. Right on Inky!
Posted by: Bubba Porter | February 7, 2009 11:25 AM
Bubba would this expression answer your statement
"GREEDY GREED"
Posted by: Inky | February 7, 2009 3:52 PM
* * * * *
Posted by: bill r. | February 7, 2009 9:17 AM
.
Back at you, bill. In the first place, you continue the myth that all the spending during the last eight years was either designed or promoted by the Republicans. That’s not true. Democrats had a big hand in all that spending. The problem was that Bush didn’t care why Congress was spending or who was behind it. He didn’t care that more than a hundred federal agencies were non-functioning wastes of money. He didn’t care about deficits and inflation. In fact, someone in his administration even claimed that deficits were good. His explicit strategy was to let Congress have its way so it would let him have his way. That’s why he signed spending bills from everyone for anything. That’s why his vetoes were few and far between - and why conservatives grit their teeth at his fiscal irresponsibility.
.
In the second place, it seems to me that, in spite of themselves, the folks in the Bush administration proved that massive government spending does not necessarily provide for a healthy, stimulated economy. You stated as much yourself. That’s because government spending results in consumption, not production. Nor does it add to the productivity of the nation's economy unless it is directed at production (which is something the Bush administration didn’t do). So, tell me: Why is this current stimulus bill so different or so much better? How does passing out tax rebate checks to those who don’t work put people back to work? How do you put back to work a wide spectrum of unemployed people by investing in labor intensive public works projects? Inquiring minds want to know.
Posted by: John W. | February 8, 2009 1:35 AM