by James Oliphant
With the Obama administration facing a make-or-break week for enacting a massive economic stimulus package, officials ramped up pressure on lawmakers Sunday to waste no time sending the bill to the president for his signature.
President Obama plans to hit the road to sell the package directly to the American public. He'll spend today in Indiana and Tuesday in Florida, and will hold his first prime-time press conference tonight at 8 pm EST.
The White House wants the president's stimulus message transmitted without distraction -- so much so that it delayed the planned rollout of the Treasury Department's revised formula for rescuing the nation's financial sector from today until Tuesday.
"There's a desire to keep the focus right now on the economic recovery program," Obama's top economic advisor, Lawrence Summers, said Sunday. "We're in a very serious situation," he said. "This is worse than at any time since the Second World War."
Summers appeared both on ABC's "This Week" and Fox News Channel's "Fox News Sunday."
His comments came as the Senate prepares to approve an $827-billion compromise version of the economic stimulus Tuesday -- one that is markedly different from the $819-billion bill that passed the House last month. House and Senate leaders will meet this week to reconcile the two versions with hopes of delivering the bill to the White House before President's Day, when Congress is scheduled to take a weeklong recess.
The Senate plan features about $100 billion more in tax cuts and less spending on aid to states and on education. Summers said there was "90 percent" overlap between the two -- and that "we've got to get closure on the last 10 percent."
See the story about Obama's stimulus pitch in Tribune newspapers and here in the Swamp:
But negotiating a final version of the massive, 800-page bill won't be easy. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) last week called the Senate's changes to the measure "very damaging." And Summers said Sunday that some parts of the House bill "are very, very important to the president," citing money for higher education in particular.
But the closer the final package veers toward the House version, the less likely it will receive support from the three Republican moderates -- Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania -- who were integral in brokering the Senate deal. All three have made no commitment to support the bill that will emerge from the House-Senate conference committee.
Democrats hold 56 Senate seats, and the chamber's two independents caucus with them. But that's only 58 votes; 60 are required to prevent a filibuster. So the support of at least two Republicans is crucial.
Obama appears intent on increasing the pressure on those Republicans and on hesitant Democrats to get behind the plan. On Monday, he will travel to Elkhart, Ind., where he will hold a campaign-style town hall meeting about the economy. He'll do the same in Fort Myers, Fla., on Tuesday.
Both cities have been hammered by the recession. Unemployment in Elkhart jumped to 15.3% from 4.7% in the past year. The jobless rate in foreclosure-plagued Fort Myers has reached 10%.
In between, he'll hold a prime-time press conference in Washington, where the economy is certain to be the primary topic.
As of now, the overwhelming majority of congressional Republicans remains deeply critical of the package, complaining that it's too expensive and contains too little in the way of tax cuts.
"We are going to amass the largest debt in the history of this country, and we are going to ask our kids and grandkids to pay for it," said Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).
Appearing on CBS' "Face the Nation" Sunday, the former presidential candidate called the measure "generational theft."
Other Republicans, such as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky this weekend, compared the stimulus bill to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's federal spending programs during the Great Depression, saying "the New Deal did not work."
That prompted a pointed response from Summers Sunday on "This Week":
"Those who presided over the last eight years, the eight years that brought us to the point where we inherit trillions of dollars of deficit, an economy that's collapsing more rapidly than at any time in the last 50 years, don't seem to me in a strong position to lecture about the lessons of history," he said.
Summers emphasized that passage of the stimulus needs to be paired with the Treasury Department's revised Troubled Assets Relief Program to effectively aid the economy.
The new Treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, will outline Tuesday how the administration plans to spend the second half of the $700 billion earmarked last fall to bail out the financial sector.
Members of Congress and the public have complained that the first $350 billion was spent without transparency and went to banks that did not in turn help struggling homeowners.
Administration officials would not confirm specifics in the plan Sunday, but it is expected to include $50 billion toward foreclosure relief for homeowners. It is also expected to inject more capital into ailing banks and to insure banks against losses from so-called "toxic" mortgage-based assets -- those whose mortgages exceed their market value. The plan may also include some government-backed incentives to encourage the private sector to purchase some of those assets.
Summers said on "Fox News Sunday" that utilizing private capital to help clean the assets off the books of distressed banks is preferable to using federal money alone to do so.
"With the right strategic approaches, Secretary Geithner believes that we can bring in substantial private capital, and that's something we all ought to be able to agree on," Summers said, "that where we can catalyze private capital, that's a better root to solving this problem than government resources."





Comments
Give the people what they need and what they want...,the "Fair Tax". They will take home their entire check. And will be able to spend it as they choose. By doing the"Fair Tax" the people with their added purchasing power will get our economy going again. You will have less foreclosures, people will be able to afford food and clothing as well as healthcare. Its WIN WINj
Posted by: Paul | February 9, 2009 9:03 AM
Give the people what they need and what they want...,the "Fair Tax". They will take home their entire check. And will be able to spend it as they choose. By doing the"Fair Tax" the people with their added purchasing power will get our economy going again. You will have less foreclosures, people will be able to afford food and clothing as well as healthcare. Its WIN WIN
Posted by: Paul | February 9, 2009 9:03 AM
Hmmm....I see an over 60% approval rating for the prez and over 60% dissaproval rating for the Congress. Yet...the Congress acts as though the numbers are flip-flopped! We, the people, want you, to listen to us....and to the one we approve of! Vote for the stimulus and gloat you Dems if it works and the same for the Repubs if it tanks!
Posted by: Thomas Green | February 9, 2009 9:47 AM
I find it totally ironic that the President is screaming about the economic crisis and the republicans failure to act.
In order offset the negative perception of the plan his democrats have come up with, he schedules a trip to sell it.
The trip, like the plan itself, will end up costing millions of dollars and creating no new jobs.
It's all about the perception of doing something good for America while advancing his socialist, hypocritical agenda.
Posted by: Greg | February 9, 2009 9:59 AM
Obama is working his propaganda as fast as he can. Spend spend spend it's good for America - what a crock. Every day that the Congress stalls is a good day. I hope Obama fails.
Posted by: Lyn | February 9, 2009 10:31 AM
We have representatives elected to take care of these matters. The President should not be "hitting the road" or going "prime time" with this matter as he is circumventing the system.
Just like someone at work going around an immediate manager.
Posted by: John Fischer | February 9, 2009 10:38 AM
The Republicans have been completely disruptive in this process, stripping out the items that according to economists have the highest return on investment, and expanding the items that have the lowest return on investment. Now we see all too clearly how the Bush Administration expanded government spending so far for so little in return. The Democrats ought to simply dictate their terms and bring the final bill under budget reconciliation rules, which would only require 51 votes in the Senate.
Posted by: DBX | February 9, 2009 10:46 AM
How can the president lose this debate, seeing how the Swamp and the rest of the Big Media only gives HIS side?
For an example, take a look at the above article, which quotes Democrat supporters of the bill 10 times as much as opponents.
Posted by: Inconvenient Truths | February 9, 2009 11:46 AM
The Fear Mongering by Barney Frank, Lawrence Summers, the Democrat Party et.al. and specifically President Obama is pathetic. He promised to be bipartisan, yet he gives the message to Pelosi, Reid and their party of controlling democrats the reigns of this biggest spending package of all time without Republican input.
What a way to run an administration based on Change and Hope - I won! do my bidding or else?
This Stimulus Bill is laden with Pork and Earmarks (no matter what Dicky Do Nothing Durbin claims) the likes of which have never been seen before in American history (gee the Obama administration is full of History making moments).
The fantastic claims of 3 to 4 Million jobs created and/or retained is only possible if you take that money as being spent over a six year period - MAYBE. We have to slow down and examine each and every Pot 'O Gold being proposed. The majority are not emergencies necessary to reverse the economic crisis.
This bill in it's totality is a burden of debt far outlasting any immediate or long lasting recovery benefits. There's way too much fat on the steak and we'll be sorry in the long run for paying for so much fat.
Posted by: springfield | February 9, 2009 11:55 AM
I hope things start on time.
Posted by: bdd | February 9, 2009 12:04 PM
Enjoy the great depression, Lyn.
Posted by: Flo | February 9, 2009 12:11 PM
Obama = Jimmy Carter 2.0!
Posted by: Bill | February 9, 2009 12:18 PM
To be exact, the above article quotes Democrats 152 words, Republicans 30 words.
5-1 Dem over Rep. And at 5 to 1 Dem, this is one of the more balanced Swamp articles.
Way to go, Mr. Oliphant. David Axelrod would be pleased.
Posted by: Inconvenient Truther | February 9, 2009 2:37 PM
Notice the improved ripoff angle in the second to last paragraph: “private capital to help clean the assets off the books of distressed banks”. Translation: whatever halfway salvageable assets the government might come to own from this bailout will instead be sold to the private sector (mega hedge funds, etc) at giveaway prices with a no loss guarantee to boot. So the government IE the public gets nothing for its billions.
But what would you expect with a fox like Summers in charge of figuring out how to rescue the chickens. So instead of bankers and hedge funds go to jail, we get public gets screwed yet again. Where do you think the government is eventually going to collect these gifts to the “private sector” from.
Posted by: Will | February 9, 2009 3:42 PM
It must be a full moon....I only hear HOOOOOOOWL!
Posted by: bill r. | February 9, 2009 3:50 PM
I counted 37 periods and 18 commas. It was totally overshadowed be the colons and solidus.
Posted by: bill r. | February 9, 2009 4:36 PM
You know because of this BS I am going to miss NCIS. That is a heck of a lot more important than hearing Obama preach about what fiscally irresponsible people. Gee what is the world coming too.
Posted by: Richard | February 24, 2009 6:15 PM