by Tom Hamburger and Josh Meyer
The leading candidate to head the Justice Department office that oversees legal policy and judicial nominations recently has been a lobbyist for several pro-business organizations including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and if confirmed would violate the Obama administration's ethics rules.
The likely nominee to head Justice's Office of Legal Policy, Mark Gitenstein, worked as a lobbyist for the Chamber between 2000 and 2008, helping his firm earn more than $6 million in fees, according to federal lobbying records. The business alliance has pushed the White House and Congress to appoint judges and enact legislation that would make it harder for plaintiffs to sue large corporations and collect large damage awards, raising concerns from some activists.
Gitenstein, a partner at the Mayer Brown law firm in Washington, was a longtime senior aide to Vice President Joseph Biden Jr. In recent years, he also has served as counsel to the Chamber's Institute for Legal Reform, which pushed for changes in federal litigation rules and adding business-friendly judges to state courts.
If he is named by Obama, Gitenstein would be another appointee who violates the new president's recently imposed ethics rules, which prevent anyone who has registered to lobby in the past two years from working in a related area of the administration. In an interview, Gitenstein said he could not comment.
But several administration and congressional officials confirmed that Gitenstein is at the top of Obama's list for the job.
One U.S. Senate official who worked closely with Gitenstein said that he has openly discussed his pending move to the Justice Department with former colleagues, speculating on who he might bring over from Mayer Brown and perhaps also from Biden's former Senate staff.
See the rest of the report on the Justice candidate and lobbyist in Tribune newspapers and here in the Swamp:
Biden was a senior member and for eight years chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Gitenstein was chief Democratic counsel on the committee from 1981 to 1989He has been a close political and legal advisor to Biden ever since.
``It's all but a done deal,'' said the Senate official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity given the sensitivity of pending White House nominations. ``He's already placing people there, which he would not be able to do it if he were not the guy taking over there." Already, one of Gitenstein's colleagues at Mayer Brown, Rajesh De, has joined the Justice Department's Office of Legal Policy, the Senate official said.
If nominated, Gitenstein would need confirmation by the Judiciary Committee.
The possibility of Gitenstein's selection has begun to alarm some Obama supporters on the left. One reform organization, Public Citizen, this week launched a campaign against him, urging President Obama not to go forward with the nomination.
"The American people deserve better than to have an opponent of their legal interests placed in a key Justice Department policy position," said Public Citizen's David Arkush in a letter sent to the president.
A White House spokesman said he could not comment immediately on the issue, and Justice Department officials said they could not discuss pending nominations. But Jeff Connaughton, a former close colleague on Biden's staff, defended Gitenstein and said his lobbying efforts were no different than most lawyers in Washington who go in and out of government.
``If we are going to disqualify every lawyer from defending corporate clients, that is going to cut quite a swath through the bar association. Where he needs to recuse himself, Mark has said he will recuse himself, consistent with the Obama policy,'' said Connaughton, who is chief of staff to Biden's handpicked replacement from Delaware, Sen. Ted Kaufman.
In addition, an official of the People for the American Way organization, which often disagreed with business lobbyists on judicial nominations, endorsed Gitenstein's candidacy.
``I know people have objections to his clients,'' said one Justice Department official. ``But if he ends up being nominated and is confirmed, he will not be involved in any of the areas on which he lobbied for two years.''
``He's done a lot of things over the years. Lobbying for the chamber isn't the only thing that he's done,'' the Justice Department official said of Gitenstein, speaking on the condition of anonymity, citing similar concerns about sensitive White House personnel issues.
The Office of Legal Policy (OLP), is a little known but enormously powerful unit. It has primary responsibility for advising the administration on judicial selection and helping to shepherd judicial nominees through the Senate. It was established in 1981 as the principal Department office to plan, develop, and coordinate the implementation of major policy initiatives of high priority to the Department and to the Administration.
Senate records compiled first by Public Citizen show that Gitenstein was registered by Mayer Brown to lobby on behalf of the Chamber, Merrill Lynch, Ernst & Young and other corporations on an array of issues dealing with accounting standards, securities litigation, wireless regulation.
For the Chamber, the disclosure forms show that he concentrated on legal issues that would likely confront any judicial nominees: class action and legal reforms, and the question of federal pre-emption of lawsuits filed in state courts.
These have been the top legal issues pushed by the business lobbies in Washington recentlyJustice Department sources said that Gitenstein's nomination was expected in the near future and considered all but assured, in part because he is close to Biden. After leaving Capitol Hill, Gitenstein, like so many others in Washington moved to a blue-chip lobbying and law firm advising clients on issues that he dealt with as a public employee.
Gitenstein ceased his work for the Chamber last summer when he took a leave from his law firm to work for the Obama-Biden campaign.
Despite Gitenstein's proximity to business interests in recent years, the Chamber did not push for his appointment and, according to a spokesman, has not communicated with him since he took a leave to work for the campaign.
The chamber backed judicial nominees like Chief Justice John Roberts and Samuel Alito who were considered friendly to business on judicial issues. Their nomination was opposed by Obama when he was in the Senate.









Comments
Big Deal! Obama has always dealt with and employed lobbyists. So what?
.
Umm... no wait. there's that whole "change" thing. D'OH!
Posted by: Homer | February 5, 2009 8:28 AM
So I guess when Obama signed the executive order banning lobbyists from his administration, it was "just an honest mistake"?
That's change we can believe in. Yep.
Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspirator | February 5, 2009 8:43 AM
Obama is just shocked, SHOCKED, to discover there was lobbying going on over here.
Posted by: Jeff | February 5, 2009 8:49 AM
"Business as usual". How about that "hand picked" Senator. Another day, another waiver. Inky is right, "crumbling" ethical standards and broken promises. Classified waivers on rendition, interrogation, Gitmo after announcing change, tax cheats, union payoffs, earmarks and special interest spending, wasteful Pork, signing legislation without 5 day review, avoiding and misleading answers to questions, questionable transparency,... ad nauseam and it's what, day 17. The 54% got your hero. I'm going to feed my horses and work on the ol' wagon and harnesses, the Dems. want to pay me to crush my gas guzzler pickup. Y'know, for climate change and economic stimulus. At least the barn is clean, can't say that about Washington.
Posted by: Bubba Porter | February 5, 2009 8:56 AM
Here we go again. Obama look for another song.
Posted by: Paul | February 5, 2009 9:04 AM
Remember Bush I, how, after he broke his "read my lips, no new taxes," it was shown ENDLESSLY on news shows? (And it should have been.)
What I'd like now, and haven't really seen, is for, every time Obama hires a lobbyist, to have the news shows play, endlessly, the clip from 2007 where he pledges something along the lines of "and lobbyists won't get a job in my White house."
He was emphatic. People voted for him based on that, among other things. (I didn't -- I was smart enough to know he was selling snake oil.) And he is breaking that promise right and left. He thinks we're stupid. Could we at least show him for the liar/craven politician that he is?
Posted by: liz | February 5, 2009 9:37 AM
There are four types of people in DC.
1. Lobbyist.
2. Future Lobbyist.
3. Those who cover 1 and 2.
4. Unemployed.
I will at least give Obama credit for making himself waiver his own rules so he can see how many of the influence peddlers he has.
Posted by: Karl | February 5, 2009 9:39 AM
More proof his CHANGE IS CRUMBLING.
Posted by: Inky | February 5, 2009 11:35 AM
Isn't it interesting that all the libs are over on the Dick Cheney article beating up on him, but they're conspicuously absent here. Go figure.
Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspirator | February 5, 2009 11:50 AM
No lobbyists? Another example of a boneheaded gaffe by Obama during his campaign, that his adorers tried to spin as if it were some kind of new, clever policy. We've seen this before with his gaffe about meeting with dictators; Obama screws up, is too embarrassed to recant it, and it (laugh track) becomes policy. These examples are evidence of how naive Obama is. It is boneheaded to say there will be no lobbyists because these people are often the one's who know the industry the best and are the most qualified. Obama realizes that now. At least he knows he wont be taken to account for it. There will be a few scattered articles and blogs, but like Liz said above, to completely renege on something he was so emphatic about within days of taking office, he should be getting beaten over the head with it.
No liberals going to defend this? Bill R? John E? You guys can come up with something to defend Obama or at least deflect attention by changing the subject. Start talking about George Bush. No war for oil.
Posted by: Herbie H. | February 5, 2009 1:20 PM
"making himself waiver his own rules " yeah, it takes a lot of bravery to allow YOURSELF to give YOU waivers to the rule you, yourself, created. What a hero.
Posted by: Jeff | February 5, 2009 4:47 PM
Round up the usual suspects! This country is going down hill rapidly. All my hope for things to turn around with a new start in the White House is gone by the waste side. This President is not doing his home work. Is seems all he does is go on television to explain his mishaps. This guy is turning into a real embarrassment. Maybe we can have a do over.
Posted by: Paul | February 5, 2009 4:53 PM