by Frank James
More bad though unsurprising economic-related news this morning. General Motors is verging on bankruptcy, according to its auditors. The information is in the car makers latest annual report filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
An excerpt from the Associated Press:
DETROIT (AP) -- General Motors Corp.'s auditors have raised "substantial doubt" about the troubled automaker's ability to continue operations.The company revealed the concerns, raised by the accounting firm Deloitte & Touche LLP, in its annual report filed on Thursday.
GM has received $13.4 billion in federal loans as it tries to survive the worst auto sales climate in 27 years. It is seeking a total of $30 billion from the government. During the past three years it has piled up $82 billion in losses, including $30.9 billion in 2008.
GM says in its report that its auditors cited recurring losses from operations, stockholders' deficit and an inability to generate enough cash to meet its obligations in raising substantial doubts about its ability to continue as a going concern.
The company said in its filing that its future depends on successfully executing the viability plan submitted to the government in February to justify the loans.
"If we fail to do so for any reason, we would not be able to continue as a going concern and could potentially be forced to seek relief through a filing under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code," GM said in the annual report, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.GM, the report said, is highly dependent on auto sales volume, which dropped rapidly last year.
"There is no assurance that the global automobile market will recover or that it will not suffer a significant further downturn," the company wrote.
The company is essentially saying that everything from hereon in must break just right for GM if it's to not be thrown into bankruptcy court. That seems like a fairly tall order at this point.
The question for Washington policymakers is, given how tenuous GM's auditors are saying its future is and how many factors must line up exactly right, how much more taxpayer money should the Obama Administration and Congress funnel into the company?
The problem is, if GM doesn't receive future financial help from the federal government and governments abroad, that essentially assures it will need to seek bankruptcy protection sooner rather than later. But it may be only staving off the inevitable.
In short, GM and American taxpayers may be damned if they do and damned if they don't.









Comments
Obama can't afford many more bailouts of the auto industry, financially or politically, so GM may be on its own at some point.
http://www.political-buzz.com/
Posted by: matt | March 5, 2009 8:21 AM
Let it die.
Posted by: Jeff | March 5, 2009 2:09 PM
They need to go Chapter 11, dump those outrageous union contracts, and go with a right-to-work agreement with the state and their workers.
Posted by: S. Lobber | March 5, 2009 4:26 PM
Here's my question, the auditors admit they'll need a miracle to NOT go into chapter 11. They haven't been profitable in years. They've already blown through most of the TARP money they were given. How in the H-E-double hockey sticks are Rick Wagoner (GM CEO) and Bob Lutz (GM Vice Chairman) still employed? Does the UAW control enough of the board to protect such failure at the top?
Posted by: Jeff | March 5, 2009 5:35 PM
THANK GOD for FORD MOTOR COMPANY! A True American Classic that endures and plans for the future.
Posted by: doe koosis | March 7, 2009 3:56 AM
First of all, the word "bailout" does not apply to the auto industry. These are bridge loans to be paid back. Ignorance of this fact needs to be addressed more aggressivly. "Bailouts" are what the banks received - no strings attached. Remember?
Secondly, it is very sad to read how many bloggers want GM to just choke and die. Yes - agreed, GM made some bad business decisions over the years. But as a tax-payer, I think I'd rather gamble on an American icon (GM) that was just about to turn the corner and perhaps save one million plus jobs for yet a while longer, rather than give that same 30B to AIG and watch them laugh in our faces again as they pay out millions more in "already promised" bonuses.
Posted by: paul hamm | March 7, 2009 10:09 AM