Romney: Obama's 'liberal' agenda: The Swamp
The Swamp
Chicago Tribune

He hopes Obama succeeds at righting economy, fails at "liberal'' agenda.

Posted March 20, 2009 9:40 AM
The Swamp

by Mark Silva

Add another voice to the chorus of Republicans who hope that President Barack Obama's "liberal'' agenda "fails:''

Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts who sought the Republican Party's presidential nomination last year, made his own nighttime TV appearance last night while Obama was getting the spotlight at Jay Leno's Tonight Show.

Romney, who told CNN's Larry King that he didn't find Obama's appearance with Leno appropriate at a time like this, also suggested that he won't be making another run for president - for, while as much as he hopes that Obama's own agenda fails, he does hope that Obama can succeed as president in righting the economy and repairing the polar rift that has divided the nation politically.

Now, Sarah Palin running is another story, Romney suggested. The Alaska governor "lit the place up'' when she ran for vice president and remains "a powerful voice'' for the GOP.

"Some are seeing a problem with the president doing the Tonight Show, the first sitting president ever to do a late-evening fun show,'' King asked Romney. "Do you have a problem with it?''

"Well, this probably isn't the right time for it,'' Romney said. "I must admit, I line up with Warren Buffett on this. I prefer to see the president focusing all of his time and energy on the economy.''

But Obama was talking about the economy last night, King noted of a Tonight Show interview dominated by the issue.

"He is talking about it,'' Romney said. "He's out doing a rally in California. He's posing for the cover of magazines and doing a number of things. He's putting together a health care plan, putting together a cap and trade program, a lot of things on the agenda. And frankly, if you're doing too many things, a couple of important things can slip by.''

One of those slips: The AIG bonuses.

How does Romney account for Obama's "popularity,'' King asked (with the president's public approval ratings running around 60 percent in the mainstream opinion polls).

"I know that people recognize that this is a man who is a decent fellow. He's intelligent. He's well intentioned. He's just not experienced in the matters that we're dealing with right now. And, you know, I hope he's able to get this economy turned around. ''

Does Romney, like radio's Rush Limbaugh, want Obama to fail?

"I want liberal policies to fail,'' Romney replied. "I want him to fail in trying to put in place a health care plan that takes away the private sector from health care. I want him to fail in this cap and trade program as long as China and Brazil and Indonesia are not going to play in it. But I want him to succeed as a president, meaning, I want him to succeed in strengthening our economy, keeping us free, bringing our troops home in success from Iraq and Afghanistan. But I don't want his liberal policies to succeed.''

Why wouldn't Romney run again?

"There are a lot of good reasons not to,' Romney said. "First of all, I hope that Barack Obama is so successful that -- and he adjusts his policies such that he moves to the center, he aligns with Republicans and Democrats, and does what we thought he was going to do when he was campaigning.''


Here, courtesy of CNN, is a transcript:

Joining me now is Mitt Romney.

He was a candidate for the 2008 presidential nomination of his party, the Republican Party. He's a former governor of Massachusetts, a businessman successful by any measure of the word.

We're going to talk about the economy, our new president and, of course, AIG.

But first, Barack Obama appeared tonight on "The Tonight Show with Jay Leno."

Watch.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP FROM "THE TONIGHT SHOW WITH JAY LENO," COURTESY NBC)

BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: The bonuses that went to AIG are a problem. But the larger problem is we've got to get back to an attitude where people know enough is enough. And people have a sense of responsibility and they understand that their actions are going to have an impact on everybody. And if we can get back to those values that built America, then I think we're going to be OK.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

KING: Welcome back, governor.

MITT ROMNEY (R), FORMER PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Thank you.

It's good to be with you, Larry.

KING: Some are seeing a problem with the president doing the "Tonight Show," the first sitting president ever to do a late-evening fun show. Do you have a problem with it?

ROMNEY: Well, this probably isn't the right time for it. I must admit, I line up with Warren Buffett on this. I prefer to see the president focusing all of his time and energy on the economy.

KING: That's what he was talking about.

ROMNEY: He is talking about it. He's out doing a rally in California. He's posing for the cover of magazines and doing a number of things. He's putting together a health care plan, putting together a cap and trade program, a lot of things on the agenda.

And frankly, if you're doing too many things, a couple of important things can slip by. And one of them that slipped by was the AIG legislation that allowed AIG executives to get these bonuses. It was put in a specific bill. Now, of course, the administration is saying they didn't know about it. You have to ask yourself, if everybody was staying home, doing their job, focusing entirely on the economy, is that something that somebody would have read? You have a thousand page bill. Somebody would have read it before they signed it.

KING: Do you have a theory on bail outs? Because President Bush did it. President Obama has done it. And their answer has been, hey, you've got to do it. You've got to do what you've got to do.

ROMNEY: Well, the term bailout has been applied to a number of different things. I think it's important to distinguish them. We don't want to have our economy collapse, so we're going to bail out the economy, if you will. We don't want to have our financial system collapse, because to make a market work, you've got to have currency, you've got to have banks. You don't want to have a cascade of failures in banks, so that your currency is not worth anything.

But you don't -- in a private world like we -- our economy works in, you don't start bailing out companies one after the other or individuals that are in trouble. You don't say, I'm going to take care of this person and not that person, or this company and not that company. Bailout of enterprises that are in trouble, that's not the right way to go. I know President Bush started it with the auto industry. I thought it was a mistake.

KING: Are you as angered over this AIG thing as probably 90 percent of the public?

ROMNEY: Yes, my view is that this is really the fault of two parties. One, the members of our government that weren't paying attention, at best. That's the most favorable way to characterize it. They weren't paying attention to the issue. They were doing a lot of other things. They should have been focusing entirely on the economy.

The other, of course, is the folks at AIG. And you ask yourself, why couldn't they have done what other enterprises do that get in trouble, which is people come together; they talk about the sacrifice they are going to make to try and keep the enterprise going. But these guys seemed not to be willing to do that. And I think it's unfortunate. This is a president who is learning on the fly. He's never turned anything around before. He hasn't had the experience of leading a nation or a business or a state in trouble. And the first rule I can tell him is focus, focus, focus. Focus on the job at hand, getting this economy going, and making sure there are no errors, no mistakes, no excessive spending. It's too risky, given the fact that the economy is hanging by a thread.

KING: How do you account for the fact that his popularity stays high?

ROMNEY: I know that people recognize that this is a man who is a decent fellow. He's intelligent. He's well intentioned. He's just not experienced in the matters that we're dealing with right now. And, you know, I hope he's able to get this economy turned around.

KING: You don't want him to fail?

ROMNEY: I want liberal policies to fail. I want him to fail in trying to put in place a health care plan that takes away the private sector from health care. I want him to fail in this cap and trade program as long as China and Brazil and Indonesia are not going to play in it. But I want him to succeed as a president, meaning, I want him to succeed in strengthening our economy, keeping us free, bringing our troops home in success from Iraq and Afghanistan.

But I don't want his liberal policies to succeed.

KING: If he called on you, would you aid him?

ROMNEY: Of course.

KING: He said he would use Republicans and Democrats.

ROMNEY: Any citizen is certainly going to respond to the call of the nation. I don't imagine my name, however, is mentioned in the White House, other than as a butt of jokes or other attacks. But again, I'm not -- I don't have any interest in participating in the administration. I feel like Judd Gregg did, which is President Obama, during the campaign moved, you know, very strongly to the center of the political spectrum. But as a president, with everything from card check now, cap and trade programs and his health care plan and his mortgage bailout plan and AIG, all of these things combined, he is far away from where I stand. And I, therefore, would not be part of that administration.

KING: Presidents do that, though. Bush moved to the center and then governed right.

ROMNEY: Well, it depends on the particular issue. I think in the case of the most successful presidents, they've been able to work at a program with people on the right and on the left, and achieve success by doing that. Bill Clinton, for instance, bowed to the desire on the part of the Republicans to reform welfare. I think it was a good thing. George Bush, likewise, was able to work on a collaborative basis to bring No Child Left Behind to fruition, and some other initiatives that he thought were important.

KING: The latest polls say you are the leader to get the party's nomination the next time around. Others say it's Rush Limbaugh leading the party. We'll see what Mitt Romney thinks after the break.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

KING: What do you make, Governor Romney, of this Limbaugh thing? Is he the head of your party?

ROMNEY: He's a very powerful voice among conservatives. And I listen to him. A lot of other people listen to him. He's not a spokesman for the party, of course. But we don't have one spokesman right now. That's just one of the features of not having either House in Congress or having the White House. You don't have an official place to be heard.

So our megaphone is not as loud as the megaphone that comes from Barack Obama. But it gets heard, nonetheless. And a lot of voices are being heard on our side of the aisle. And I think that's a good thing.

KING: So Rush is just one of them?

ROMNEY: But he's a very powerful voice in the world of conservative thought. He's not a spokesman for the party officially. We have a spokesman for the party, our RNC chair.

KING: And do you like Michael Steele?

ROMNEY: Yes, he's a good man.

KING: You are, apparently in recent polls -- you seem to lead -- it's still early --

ROMNEY: Kind of early, don't you think?

KING: Are you going to run again?

ROMNEY: I can't imagine making that decision at this point.

KING: But you're going to run again.

ROMNEY: No, I don't think. I'm glad that you're so insistent.

KING: Why wouldn't you?

ROMNEY: There are a lot of good reasons not to. First of all, I hope that Barack Obama is so successful that -- and he adjusts his policies such that he moves to the center, he aligns with Republicans and Democrats, and does what we thought he was going to do when he was campaigning.

KING: But you still have to have an opponent.

ROMNEY: Of course you have to have an opponent. I don't look at political office as something that you want to do because it will be fun or a campaign as a thrill. You get involved in public service because you think you can make a difference, and the skills and experience you've had would make the country stronger. That's something you measure down the road based upon who else is there and what the challenges are. I'd have to weigh that at the time that a race was shaping up.

KING: What do you make and did you make of Governor Palin?

ROMNEY: Boy, she was able to connect with our party in a very powerful way, ignite a lot of enthusiasm and excitement. That kind of political skill is rare. I hadn't met her before the announcement that she was going to be our VP nominee. And I thought, boy, she's going to have a tough time up there on the stage at the Republican convention.

Was I wrong. She got out there and just lit the place up, and was able to draw a lot of support from across the nation. She's a powerful voice.

KING: Did the McCain campaign in any way disappoint you?

ROMNEY: Well, I'm sure the McCain campaign disappointed John McCain.

KING: The way it was run, aspects of it?

ROMNEY: I don't recall --

KING: You and he had difficult moments.

ROMNEY: Yes. But I don't recall worrying about his campaign. I looked at my own campaign. We made our own mistakes. I'm sure the McCain campaign made some of their mistakes, too. I have nothing but respect for John McCain. I mean, the guy is a national hero, and his posture on the issues was absolutely right. So I supported him, endorsed him and I continue to speak with him on a relatively frequent basis.

KING: Back to the economy. The House today passed a measure to slap a hefty tax on big employee bonuses paid by companies getting federal bail outs. Good idea?

ROMNEY: Well, look, everybody is mad at AIG and their executives for doing what they did. It makes no sense at all. But to suggest that this is not the fault of the people in Congress who passed the specific measure allowing them to take these bonuses is a diversionary tactic and wrong. You don't have a government take punitive action against a small group of people.

Frankly, it's unconstitutional, in my view. You don't want to see that kind of power exercised by a governmental authority, to say, you know what, we're going to go after you. What they did to those guys -- the guys at AIG, I'm mad at them as anybody else. What if they said, that Larry King, he said some very offensive things about our president; we're going to go after his bonus and pass a bill to take away his money. That is not the American way.

And I understand it was driven by emotion. But in my view, it was the wrong course.

KING: Don't you think, though, the public probably supports it?

ROMNEY: Oh, sure, I think it's a very popular thing on the part of many in the public. But give it some thought, think of the second order affect. Do you really want to have a federal government that can decide after the fact to go after someone they disagree with for having done something they don't like, and take away their money?

And as angry as all of us are at what AIG executives have done, the place to vent our anger is at the people who allowed this to happen.

KING: More with Mitt Romney on this edition of LARRY KING LIVE right after this.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

KING: Welcome back. We're talking to Mitt Romney about a number of pressing issues, including the economy. Everyone is touched in some way by current events, including tonight's CNN Hero nominee. He's Jorge Munoz, quite a guy, doing what he can without very much to help day laborers in Queens. I asked him how he got started.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

JORGE MUNOZ, CNN HERO NOMINEE: About four years ago, I saw people throwing food in the garbage. So I asked if I could have that food and hand it to somebody else who needed it.

KING: Your day starts with all of this at a quarter to 5:00 in the morning with food inventory. Tell us how you prepare and gather the meals for the week.

MUNOZ: Well, I'm a school bus driver. I keep every day calling my mom. So she prepares the food. And when I get there, we pack the meals and head to the corner in Queens.

KING: Are the people appreciative of what you do?

MUNOZ: Oh, yes, they are. They are waiting for me, even in winter or summer. They are waiting right there every night around 9:30.

KING: Do you consider yourself a hero?

MUNOZ: No, I think the hero is my mom. She is the one who teached me to share things in my childhood.

KING: I'll speak for us at CNN. We consider you a hero. Congratulations, Jorge, thank you.

MUNOZ: Thank you so much, Larry. KING: Our hero nominee this week, great story, Jorge Munoz.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

KING: A lot of Americans like that.

ROMNEY: It's what makes the country what it is. I think there are some folks who believe that America is great because we've got such a great government. I don't believe that for a minute. I think America is great because we have people like that. We have individuals who love their families, who give to their community, who give to others in need, who build businesses, who create jobs. It's the individual spirit that makes America what it is.

KING: Do you have a hero?

ROMNEY: I have a lot of heroes, but probably at the top of my list are mom and dad. Neither one are around anymore but extraordinary people.

KING: We'll be right back with Mitt Romney. Don't go away.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(NEWS BREAK)

KING: The president held a town hall in California earlier today. He seems to hold one a day. This is his second in two days. Here's a little of what he had to say.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

OBAMA: We are going to meet these challenges. We will come out on the other side stronger and a more prosperous nation. That I can guarantee you. I can't tell you how long it will take, what obstacles we'll face along the way. But I promise you this, there will be brighter days ahead.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

KING: Upbeat a good idea?

ROMNEY: Absolutely. I was very concerned early on in the administration's rhetoric. They were very, very negative, talking about this being the worst downturn since the Great Depression. There were stories everywhere, as a result, talking about the Depression. That's the wrong way to go. The president has to be upbeat and the economy will turn around. The question is, will it turn around faster by virtue of what the president has done or will he actually have slowed it down?

There are some things he's done that will help and will encourage the economy to get going again. There are other things that haven't helped as much. Frankly, I liked the Republican stimulus plan better than I liked Barack Obama's. But we are going to see a stronger economy. When that occurs, when we see that turning point is difficult to predict.

KING: Former President Bush said he's not going to spend anytime criticizing Obama. He says he deserves silence. However, former Vice President Cheney is taking a very different tact, charging that he's making choices which would make us vulnerable for another attack. Which way do you go here?

ROMNEY: Well, I think there's a standard which is applied to former presidents, and that standard is that they have had their time on the stage and it's best for them to step aside and let the new president have his or her chance. I think President Bush is doing the right thing. I think every other Republican is --

KING: Former vice president.

ROMNEY: I don't know that we have a precedent there. I'm not going to judge another person's action in that regard. But I can say in my view, Barack Obama is ripe for criticism. This AIG mess is certainly at his doorstep. The fact that he's not spending his time focusing on managing the economy, but is instead in Hollywood tonight and working on cap and trade and health care and other issues, diverting from the issue at hand, I think is certainly fair game to be discussed.

KING: Do you think we're more vulnerable to an attack?

ROMNEY: I think if we're going to release the detainees that are in Guantanamo and put them out either in our own prisons or at prisons in nations that are going to release them, that will make us less secure. I'm glad that President Obama decided to pull back on his original plans to immediately bring our troops home from Iraq. We're succeeding there. He's decided to go a little more slowly there in bringing our troops hope. to make sure that it's stable. That's the right course and I appreciate that.

KING: Back with our remaining moments with Mitt Romney and another appearance of President Obama's appearance on "The Tonight Show" next.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

KING: Here's another clip from the president's appearance on "The Tonight Show" with Jay Leno tonight. Watch.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

LENO: Let me ask you, when people, Mr. President, would you like to play? Yes, I would. Do they throw the game? Come on.

OBAMA: I don't see why they would throw the game, except for all the Secret Service guys with guns around.

LENO: Exactly, exactly.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

KING: That was fun, right? That didn't harm anything?

ROMNEY: I hope not.

KING: Unless out his basketball dunking again. The word is, we know former President Bush is about to write a book. And there's the word that you are.

ROMNEY: That's true. I also heard that Sarah Palin is writing a book. There was a rumor that she had been offered an 11 million dollar advance from her publisher.

KING: That's a lot.

ROMNEY: My publisher is talking to me about 11 million dollars as well, but I couldn't come up with that much money. I've used that before, but I am writing a book.

KING: You are?

ROMNEY: Yes, you bet.

KING: About?

ROMNEY: About the country and the challenges that America faces, what it's going to take to get ourselves back on track. I'm very concerned that we're seeing the emergence of very different threats coming from Russia, from China, from the Jihadists, both from an economic standpoint, in the case of Russia, with their energy resources, and China with their productive resources.

We see an economic threat and a military threat. And it's going to take some changes here if we're going to remain the leader of the world.

KING: Do you have faith in American business?

ROMNEY: Yes. Everybody in this country has to recognize that every single dollar we have represents a good or a service produced in the private sector. Every job we have that isn't working for government comes because somebody had an idea and began a business. Small business people, big business people, they're just American citizens who took a risk and some of them find the chance to make that risk became positive and generate jobs and income.

That's a great thing. It's a good thing. We know what happens when it's not working. That's what's happening right now.

KING: What about when business goofs?

ROMNEY: To err is human and to make bad decisions is also human. You've seen some very bad characters. But whether that's an executive or a basketball player or a politician, it's throughout every society I know of. But look, we need business to be successful if we want to have good jobs. And I'm not going to be taking my time taking pot shots at the entire profession of business or any other profession in this country. Except maybe lawyers -- I'm kidding. KING: Shoot the lawyers.

ROMNEY: Shoot the lawyers first.

KING: Your wife has multiple sclerosis, a disease some scientists think will be cured through stem cell research. How is she doing?

ROMNEY: She's doing terrifically well. She's riding horses on a regular basis. She thinks that keeps her healthy and strong. And she's one of the few that has had very little progression from the disease. So I'm pleased and hopeful.

KING: Do you support the stem cell thing?

ROMNEY: I support stem cell research. I do not support creating new embryos for the purpose of taking away the life of that embryo, and taking stem cells from those embryos. There are a lot of better ways than getting stem cells from --

KING: Even though they're probably never going to be lives?

ROMNEY: If you create them in the laboratory, you're creating new life. And I wouldn't do that for the purpose of research, but there are fortunately much better ways of doing it, which has now been proven by scientists across the country.

KING: Do you think we're going to cure MS?

ROMNEY: I sure hope so. I think eventually we'll be curing most of the major diseases we know during our lifetimes. But when these things get cured, that's going to be a long time down the road.

KING: Your wife still as outspoken as always?

ROMNEY: She's the best, I'll tell you. I'm sure she's watching tonight. So, of course, outspoken and right.

KING: She says what she thinks?

ROMNEY: That's for sure.

KING: Always good seeing you.

ROMNEY: Thanks, Larry. Good to be with you.

KING: Governor Mitt Romney. We always enjoy being in his company.

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

Spin it anyway you want there mittens............absolutely makes no sense. How does his agenda fail and America not suffer? More crazy republican moonbat talk.


Socialist government are a historical failure. Why does anyone, other than a committed socialist, believe they will succeed? Look at this "class warfare" and liberal demagoguery occurring in America, fueled by the lefty MSM and political hacks of the Dems, used as a diversion while we witness our economic policies, diminished wealth, and gross government incompetence being touted on late night comedy by those in charge. It is already failing.


He's running.


A liberal democracy originally meant one where governmental infringement on liberty was minimized. Today it means just the opposite. Today it tends to mean people who want to take money from their adversaries and give it to their friends, who will reward them for their largesse through political support. This is not always a rich Republican and poor Democrat issue. Sure, I don't think Chris Dodd and the Obama Administration should have enabled AIG bonuses, but how much did Wall Street bankers contribute to their campaigns? Would Dodd really have been so malleable to suggestion from Geitner's Treasury Department if he didn't have a vested interest? And when we finish attacking all those "corrupt" Wall Street types whose houses of cards are falling down around them and us. maybe we should look in the mirror and ask ourselves if we really thought we could afford to own the house we over-extended to buy. Of course, we want to be protected from our own stupidity. Even though we could be evicted if we didn't pay rent, we have a God-given right to own a home even if we can't pay the mortgage payment, right? That is what "liberal" means today.


Well, I'm sure Gov. Romney will be relieved to know that President Obama has never proposed "a health care plan that takes away the private sector from health care." So he can stop worrying about that.


Nixon appeared on Laugh -In back in 1969, I guess that was ok right?


Maybe Mittens could take a minute and explain what is a "conservative" agenda, because I am confused. I thought it was for small government and less spending and quite frankly no "conservative" president outside of Nixon has done that. Ronnie Raygun doubled the budget and Bush doubled the debt. Hey Mittens....instead of demonizing a "liberal" agenda.....figure what kind of snake oil you guys are selling.


Boss Limbaugh set the tone with his hope that Obama fails and all of the Republicans follow his lead. Romney offers the finest in Republican doublespeak when he says that he wants Obama's agenda to fail but hopes that he can right the economy. Obama's agenda IS to fix the economy and no, Mitt, you can't have it both ways. You want him to fail. Period.

Republicans have offered absolutely no ideas on how to fix the economy. NOTHING. Meanwhile Obama has been hard at work delivering the change that he promised. Mortgage interest rates are dropping to record lows offering homeowners the opportunity to refinance thereby freeing up disposable income and first time home buyers can see their dream of home ownership become a reality. This will stimulate the economy.


Mark, did we watch the same interview? Romney didn't suggest he wouldn't be making another run for President. When asked by King, he said, in essence, ideally President Obama would be successful to the point where one wouldn't feel compelled to run, since, you don't run for public office based on the idea it would be fun to do, but because you believe you can make a positive difference.

From there the discussion extended into what that would mean. Obviously, it would mean that President Obama would have to govern, or preside, as a centrist, as a pragmatist, rather than someone content to let the left wing of congress make all the plans for him--in other words, he would act as President how he said he would in the campaign.

This is the other point that's relevant. Why it is wrong for Obama to be spending Presidential time to tell bad jokes on late night TV, fill-in a NCAA bracket on ESPN, and cash-in on a children's book deal is because that is campaign mode. He's in campaign mode because his numbers that were cited as high, on the aggregate are where Bush's were in 2001, before 9/11 struck. That's average for a first 100 day honeymooning President, and this President enjoys sychophantic and choral media coverage.

Finally, it is unfair and dishonest to characterize Romney, Rush, or any of the approximate half of the voting public who did not vote for President Obama as people who covertly want Obama to fail but are hiding behind just pulling for his liberal policies to fail. Of course those voters who voted-against Obama want such policies to fail. That's what politics is. George W. Bush was called President-Select before he was even President. That set the tone for the whole of the Democrat congress for the endurance of his Presidency. Why no mention of any past qualms when the shriekingly overt democrats sought the failure of Bush (policies)?

Now, it's not unAmerican to wish, hope, pray, and work towards a President whom you didn't vote for making sound decisions that are centristic, pragmatic, and fair. I personally did not vote for Obama, nor did I vote against him though. I was an active supporter of Mitt Romney in the primary, and I chose not to extend my support in the general since, while I didn't view Obama as someone I would desire as President, I neither viewed him as someone we couldn't work with. McCain, as I saw it, would've been worse than Bush insofar as aligning the Republican party more alongside the Democrat party,and I argued that when both parties in a two-party system were just versions of each other, we all lose. Rather than having Democrat Lite McCain, I decided I'd sit one out and let everyone else decide this elecction. I in fact blogged about all this leading up to the election, and worked for the victory of Obama, or rather the defeat of McCain's brand of Republicanism, which you can find here: http://bethemaverick.blogspot.com/

I hope Obama turns out to be a Clintonesque President in that Bill Clinton, after his first 2 years, panned out to be a decent governor of the country, and he did a lot of pragmatic things with the Republican congress. Likewise, I think Obama would be successful if he had a Republican congress to work with isntead of always running toss left plays (if you know football) to the left wing rulers of the Democrat congress.

With all this in mind, I am open-minded and objective, but naturally against liberal overhauls of the role of government. I don't keep a list of all the Obama promises being delivered or broken, nor the radical moves he's making now in attempts to save the economy. I'll watch and see if they work, or if it's politics as usual.

The state of the Republican party has its own issues to worry about, and that's where I would focus my energy as I think in 2008 our primary culture was too exclusive as it sought to essentially kick people out of the party for not being 'conservative enough'. Reagan wouldn't have been nominated in 2008. The only reason McCain slipped in was b/c the crowded field resulted in a dust bowl type game and McCain happened to be laying on the goaline when the ball fumbled out and over and into his arms. We need to smooth over our own problems first, as political types, while the elected officials do, hopefully, as Romney best put it: support the President where we can, oppose him where we must. Anything else would be unnatural and ineffective and a disservice to all Americans. This goes for both parties.


Mittens Romney, the peanut gallery. Political posturing at its finest by someone who thinks he's important. He's like a trashy used car salesman who looks at himself in the mirror all day long. This guy is a hypocrite and makes no sense.
Go ahead and put Palin on the ballot in 2012 and the Republicans will lose yet again.


If Romney were President now--He'd be working on the economy and not on some late night comedy show dissing the mentally challenged. How much lower can Obama bring down the presidency infront of the world. They're laughing at him...he's a joke.

Paulo


As I recall Tricky Dick appeared on Laugh In in 68, while he was running, not after the election.

In any event, any laughter was short-lived.


Romney is a favorite. Would like to see Libertarians work with republicans...can that ever happen.

Americans want less government interference, less taxes and no restriction on freedoms.

Can see the demos using the conservatives and libertarians as a wedge to dilute the votes and for Obama to win.

Like Eric Cantor. A republican jew with a southern accent is disarming!

Cantor, Romney, and the the SC governor along with Gregg Judge are interesting appealing candidates.

Do like to think of the infighting with republicans. They need to unify quickly.

There is a self-organzing movement afoot in America.

Americans inspired in recognition that their rights are going to be trampled, their income and work ethic numbed by the artificial ceiling of income squelching set by Obama.

Americans will be severely taxed by Obama. What he offers is a stifling economy and a lazy attitude toward work and reward. He has stolen our dreams for our children and grandchildren.

Hang your teabags outside your house when the Obama doorknockers start coming to your neighborhood.

Vote in 2010 and 2012 with the knowledge that local and state officials can raise your taxes. ...so vote out candidates who want to tax, tax, tax.


Romney's comment seems fair enough. I happen to hope his CONSERVATIVE agenda, to the extent it's a continuation of Bush's, fails just as miserably as he hopes Obama's fails and if he can live with that, I can live with this.

Rick, I very much appreciated your comment of 11:19 am. Thanks for your thoughts. Should Obama turn out to be Centrist and Pragmatist (which has been my take on him all along), I'll be a happy little camper. I don't know of any president who puts through all the promises of his campaign, and assume Obama will be no exception. All I'm asking for right now is that what he has planned for economically will give SOME boost short-term (any improvement will suffice), a decent, stable improvement over the next couple years, and a basis long-term (10, 20, 30 years) for us to have a healthy, sustainable economy once again. Do I have concerns about the bailout? You betcha! But I have even more concerns about doing nothing, and more concerns still about applying changes that have proven useless or worse over the past few years. What we're doing right now seems to me the least worrisome of a whole lot of very worrisome options, barring a better idea.

Where Republicans decide to criticize Obama, I certainly support their right to do so even if I FREQUENTLY take exception to the way they choose to make use of their rights (a few have even hoped for Obama's assassination, which I find unacceptable at any time), especially in the wake of the past several years where anyone who criticized Bush was, out-of-hand, a traitor and an America-hating pariah. I can't speak for others, but my criticism of Bush came out of a belief what he was doing was ineffective, ill-advised and sorely in need of a better plan (Iraq, especially post Saddam's fall from power) and/or downright dangerous and destructive (the overstepping of his Executive authority and disregard for the Constitution). It took a LOT of missteps and disconnects on Bush's part, coupled with what I still perceive to have been a total disregard for the consequences of his actions or lack thereof, for me to reach a point where I could not trust or support him on any level at all. And I've gone on record saying that if Obama turns out to be as bad a president as Bush was, I'll be at the head of the line demanding his removal (as we SHOULD have removed Bush from office).
.
"Support where we can, oppose where we must" seems a good plan. Don't think anyone can really expect more. Thanks again.


.....and we're supposed to care what loser Plastic Mitt thinks..??



"Mitt the Quit Speaks"
Hey remember me, I quit in a time of war! Hey remember me, I lost, and quit at a time of War on Terror! Just trying to stay in the public eye. Hey remember me!


Was Mitt wearing his magic underwear when he made this statement?


You know what I fing hilarious?The Wingnuts are whining about their taxes being raised but unless they are among the top 1-2% wealthy elite in this country they are actually getting a tax cut. And the rich who are bitching about their taxes going up? They really aren't, their tax rate is just going back to what it was before Bush gave them their unnecessary tax cut when he took office, and this won't happen until 2011.


I'm always amazed at the way Republicans can motivate their minions to protest against their own self interests.


Tea Bagging? ha ha ha!



“Maybe Mittens could take a minute and explain what is a "conservative" agenda, because I am confused. I thought it was for small government and less spending and quite frankly no "conservative" president outside of Nixon has done that.”
* * * * *
.
Posted by: bill r. | March 20, 2009 10:43 AM
.
That’s funny, bill, I thought you were old enough to remember Eisenhower. Eisenhower was definitely a Republican and he was definitely for small government and fiscal responsibility. In fact, his administration was the last to see the national debt actually decrease. (Nixon, as you may or may not remember, was his VP.)
.
In addition, Gerald Ford (Nixon’s replacement via the 25th Amendment) also implemented a program of fiscal austerity at the federal level in hopes of reining in the economic crisis of his time. He was openly critical of the Democrat led Congress’ spendthrift ways, and vetoed sixty six spending bills. He may not have been as much of a success at reining in the federal government as Eisenhower or Nixon, but he certainly gave it his best effort.
.
Thus, it is simply not true that no “conservative” president outside of Nixon has been for small government and less spending. We all need to stand up, take a deep breath and re-think our narrow views of recent history.


That’s funny, bill, I thought you were old enough to remember Eisenhower.
Posted by: John W. | March 20, 2009 2:08 PM


My mistake...you sir are correct.


We all need to stand up, take a deep breath and re-think our narrow views of recent history.

Posted by: John W. | March 20, 2009 2:08 PM
....


Yes we do, and you should be first in line in admitting that the already overwhelmingly debuked "conservatism" that you keep beating your head against the wall with, is a joke....just ask Alan Greenspan.


Obviously, narcissism is one of the requirments for Republican party membership.



Eisenhower was a small government fiscal conservative who brought about the largest infrastructure program in history (The Federal Highway System), used federal troops to enforce the law in defiance of a State government (Arkansas), and stayed silent while a demagogue of his own political party used the power of his office to ruthlessly investigate and persecute american citizens based on their associations and political activities. He used the power of the United States to thwart democratic regimes in Iran, Congo and Guatemala.


* * * * *
Posted by: Reality | March 20, 2009 5:20 PM
.
Eisenhower supported the national highway system out of concerns for national defense. He had taken part in first Transcontinental Motor Convoy on the Lincoln Highway from Washington D.C. to San Francisco back in 1919. The purpose of the convoy was to test the ability of the U.S. government to send troops to the West Coast in the event of an invasion. It failed miserably. Somewhere between that experience and his own observation of the Autobahn in Germany, he determined that a better freeway system was needed to insure domestic defense. Thus, contrary to some claims, the national highway system was not built in order to promote interstate commerce. It was a defense measure from beginning to end.
.
Eisenhower’s use of federal troops in Arkansas was undertaken to enforce the Constitution of the United States. Governor Orval Faubus had used elements of the Arkansas National Guard to enforce segregation in the teeth of the Brown v. Board of Education decision. Eisenhower federalized the Arkansas National Guard, sent them back to their barracks, and then deployed elements of the 101st Airborne Division to insure the security of black children. Are you telling me he was wrong? I don’t think so.
.
You then seem to find fault with him regarding McCarthy. As President, Eisenhower had absolutely no power over the dealings of Congress or any of its individual members, including McCarthy. However, Eisenhower was critical of McCarthy, and refused to honor McCarthy’s subpoenas to White House staff members. Thus, unlike you, I cannot find fault with Eisenhower for not attempting to do more.
.
As for the rest of what you have stated, I do not have enough information to comment in reply.


* * * * *
Posted by: You Betcha | March 20, 2009 3:54 PM
.
JohnEEEE-Boy,
.
Put a sock in it already, will ya? Your contrariness just to be contrary is sooooooo predictable.


As I recall Tricky Dick appeared on Laugh In in 68, while he was running, not after the election.

In any event, any laughter was short-lived.

Posted by: ornery | March 20, 2009 1:26 PM

REPUBLICANSWrong! Nixon was President when he appeared on Laugh-In.

Eisenhower appeared on the Producers' Showcase in 1954;
The Colgate Comedy Hour in 1955 the Ed Sullivan Show in 1958.
He is the only president to have won an Emmy (in 1956)

So again I ask, So, its ok for Republican Presidents to appear on TV but not Democratic Presidents? REPUBLICANS=HYPOCRITES


As I recall Tricky Dick appeared on Laugh In in 68, while he was running, not after the election.

In any event, any laughter was short-lived.

Posted by: ornery | March 20, 2009 1:26 PM

I stand corrected you are right.

Oh and by the way Ford made taped appearances on Saturday Night Live as well...


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "u" in the field below:

Barack Obama
Want to see more photos? Click here

Play "Budget Hero"

Play Budget Hero

Latest polls

News, but funnier

Cartoon

Walt Handelsman

Cartoon

The Lowe- Down

Cartoon

Joe Fournier

Cartoon

Editorial cartoons

Quizzes

Rahm Emanuel

Know the real Rahm?

McCain

Presidential trivia