by James Oliphant
The Obama administration is moving to rewrite the rules of the game for credit card lenders, vowing to crack down on high interest rates and predatory practices it says contributed to the economic crisis.
The drive, which comes as Congress takes up competing plans to impose greater regulation and oversight on card companies, faces stiff resistance from the industry. Companies warn that proposed bills could tighten credit and damp the increased consumer spending they say is necessary for economic recovery.
On Thursday, President Obama and his chief economic advisor, Lawrence H. Summers, will meet at the White House with executives from leading credit card issuers, such as American Express Co., Bank of America Corp., Visa Inc., Capital One Financial Corp. and MasterCard Inc.
Many of those lenders have raised interest rates substantially as the recession has deepened, and defaults and delinquencies have shot up.
Summers said Sunday that the president was focusing on such credit card abuses as those "having to do with the way people have been deceived into paying extraordinarily high interest rates that they wouldn't have paid if they knew what they were getting themselves into."
On Monday, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said there were several goals for the Thursday meeting.
"There are meaningful uses for credit, obviously, in this economy," Gibbs said. "What we want to do is make sure that people have access to credit, but you can also do this in a way that's transparent and fair."
Also this week, members of the House Financial Services Committee will consider a bill by Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.) referred to as the Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights. The measure takes its name from Obama's pledge in the presidential campaign to provide more protection for consumers from arbitrary interest rate hikes and late fees.
One thrust of the Maloney bill, which also is backed by Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.), would call for clearer labels on the financial products, similar to those used for food. The White House wants a system that rates credit card offers for consumers, Gibbs said.
The Maloney bill is similar to rules the Federal Reserve will put into effect in 2010.
A version of the bill passed the House last year with significant Republican support. Maloney said Monday that she hoped for quick congressional action on the measure.
That may give it a stronger chance of survival than the competing proposal offered by Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.), which provides for more extensive federal oversight and has drawn sharper opposition from the industry.
"I have high hopes we can pass the House again, work out differences with the Senate's version and get this to the president's desk before summer," she said.
The Dodd bill dictates when lenders could increase interest rates and would prevent rate hikes when a cardholder has stayed current on payments even if the holder's overall credit score has declined.
Lobbyists such as Scott Talbott of the Financial Services Roundtable, an industry trade group, warn that a draconian approach will restrict the flow of credit to consumers and inhibit economic recovery.
"Some people will be denied credit, and everyone else will be paying more," Talbott said. "Our economy is driven by consumer purchases. Credit cards are used to make a lot of those purchases."
In a letter last month, Floyd Stoner, a lobbyist for the American Bankers Assn., said Dodd's bill "would exacerbate the problems facing the U.S. economy by imposing serious restraints on card lenders' ability to serve consumers and small businesses."
Dodd has taken a strong stand against credit card issuers at a time when he has shown political vulnerability for his perceived ties to the financial sector, particularly insurance giant American International Group Inc.
Polls show Dodd, who is up for reelection next year, trailing his Republican opponent, former U.S. Rep. Rob Simmons.









Comments
Obama's point man Summers says "people have been deceived into paying extraordinarily high interest rates".
Substitute the word "taxes" for "interest rates", and that's an apt description of the Obama tax and spending hikes.
Posted by: William Allen White | April 21, 2009 8:22 AM
All those dirty tricks the banks play on their credit card customers could have been halted years ago by chaninging Treasury regulations and action by Federal Reserve.
Thank Uncle Alan (Greenspan) and Paulson if you're not happy with being jacked around all those years.
Posted by: uncle miltie | April 21, 2009 8:38 AM
William White, you might want to compare current tax rates (and any Obama proposals) to those we paid in prior years and decades, including under Reagan, and then correct your comment. Where is the deception?
Posted by: Flo | April 21, 2009 10:32 AM
People are careless and reckless.
They want, want, want; so the y charge, charge, charge.
There is no delayed graitification. There is no thinking beyond today. They don't think about tomorrow.
Stop blaming business for inept, stupid people.
Don't get a credit card if you can't pay the bills you have charged.
Do the people even think they can manage when they don't pay off their accounts.
Suffer you idiots. You got yourself into the mess, stop depending on daddy-our government- to constantly bail you out. You have a child's mind.
Let the companies who have allowed the excessive charging suffer those consequences. If the customer doesn't pay, that's too bad for the company that allowed them to charge.
Don't put this mess on the american public and make the public pay for these nitwits.
Posted by: Grow up | April 21, 2009 10:46 AM
Flo,
Tax rates - Reagan - 28% was highest tax rate. Obama -35% now, heading towards 39.6% in 2 years. In addition, under Reagan, as your income incraesed, you didn't lose the rights of any credits (which can give effective tax rates of even over 100% on the increnmental dollar).
As to the credit card, the proposals aren't off the reservation, but what about the individual saying "no" to the credit card?
Posted by: Terry | April 21, 2009 8:30 PM
Would that be the same Terry who said liar loans weren't a problem, that the fallout from these questionable practices would be contained to the banks and borrowers? Yeah, I thought so.
Posted by: dt☢ | April 21, 2009 9:53 PM
Same Terry,
These are reasonable accomadations. Although the card holders s/b accountable for the contracts they sign. However, if the card companies are changing the terms of the contract, the card holder should have recourse.
Why can't the cardholder just quit using the card and live within their means?
Posted by: Terry | April 21, 2009 11:10 PM
That's total bull, Terry; as Reagan lowered rates, he also wiped out all the deductions, including credit card interest. So the "average" middle class American didn't get a cut at all. That 28% seems wrong, Terry. Can I trust your figures? I doubt it.
Posted by: Flo | April 21, 2009 11:25 PM
Summers was part of the problem under Clinton.
Treasury regulations permitted credit card units of banks to , as they liked to say, p-ss on their customers with retroactive interest increases, usurious interest rates, universal default rules, etc. etc.
Summers collected huge "speaking fees" from the people he's going to be "meeting" with to chat about cardholder relief.
What's wrong with this picture?
Posted by: ornery | April 22, 2009 1:28 AM
dt,
As I also stated, their s/b some personal responsibility. If the bank is changing the terms of the contract, they s/b held accountable. The order on which payments are posted to the custiomers account should not be based upon the interest rate of the variance balances of the account. These seem to be common sense.
Posted by: Terry | April 22, 2009 9:58 PM
Flo,
Yes many deductions were eliminated - small price to pay for lowering rates from 70% to 28%. Created a lot of jobs, the middle class was much better off when Reagan was done with his 8 years than when he started.
Posted by: Terry | April 25, 2009 1:09 PM
I PAID MY CHASE C.C. IN FULL & CLOSED ACCOUNT 4/08/2009 . TODAY I GOT A $22.30 BILL FOR CLOSING MY ACCOUNT! perlillemoen@peoplepc.com
Posted by: Per Lillemoen | April 29, 2009 5:02 PM