Obama's budget cutting: Fractional?: The Swamp
The Swamp
Chicago Tribune

100 million here, 100 million there, "pretty soon... adds up to real money"

Posted April 20, 2009 12:00 PM
The Swamp

by Mark Silva and updated again at 1:45 pm EDT

President Barack Obama, holding his first Cabinet meeting this morning, has an assignment for the group:

Cutting $100 million from their budgets in 90 days - with a deadline for reporting back in three months on where they're cutting.

"A hundred million dollars here, a hundred million dollars there -- pretty soon, even in Washington, it adds up to real money,'' Obama told his Cabinet members today.

The Republicans on Capitol Hill have their own take on this undertaking, however, noting that, in the context of the $3.55-trillion budget that the president is seeking for 2010, the $100 million in cuts sought won't amount to much.

"The White House is announcing today that they are cutting $100 million of federal spending,'' one Republican source says. "That might sound like a lot to some, but if you do a little math that turns out to be 0.0025 percent of federal spending for Fiscal Year 2009.''

Another on the Hill suggests that the finance charge on the economic stimulus bill which Obama won one month in office -- and which all the House Republicans voted against -- amounts to $95 million dollars a day: "So the savings they identify today will pay for one day of the interest on the stimulus debt. One day.''

"Let's not forget that at the same time they're looking for millions in savings, the president's budget calls for adding trillions to the debt,'' says Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) "The nation's debt is at its highest level ever, but under the administration's budget, the amount of public debt will double in five years and triple in 10."

"Only in Washington, D.C., is $100 million not a lot of money,'' White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs suggested.

The White House says agencies already have initiated some cuts:

At the Agriculture Department, starting with the 2009 crop year, all recipients of federal farm subsidies will have to provide income information for verification. Eliminating those who don't qualify could save $16 million.

Agriculture is moving 1,500 employees from seven leased locations into one in 2011, saving $62 million over a 15-year lease.

Computers may be all the vogue in the classroom, but the Department of Education has cut the ratio of computers per employee, requiring that most use laptop computers (as opposed to keeping a desktop and also a laptop). This will save $2 million a year. They're cutting down on printers, too, saving another $6.7 million.

Homeland Security spends $100 million a year on office supplies, but virtually none are purchased through agreements that leverage the department's collective buying power. The agency figures it can save up to $52 over five years by buying in bulk.

Homeland also has spent $3 million on consulting contracts to create new seals and logos. It's "putting an end to that.''

Federal prosecutors are going paperless with their notices for asset forfeiture, switching from newspaper ads to the Internet - saving $6.7 million over five years. The State Department also is going paperless in visa processing, saving $1 million in a year.

At Veterans Affairs, they have cancelled or delayed 26 conferences, saving nearly $17.8 million. They will be going to more video-conferencing in their training programs.

All of which, as the Republicans on the Hill will note, a fraction of the federal budget.

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

At least he's doing SOMETHNG! How about we cut the congress members salaries to a dollar? Most of them (including poor Burris) are millionaires and probably don't need the income.


A trillion here, a trillion there. Pretty soon it adds up to real fiscal and monetary collapse.


If Obama is going to plagiarize Everett Dirksen's famous statement about "a million here...", at least he should attribute it. Or did his TelePrompter leave that part out. Plagiarizing apparently is not a faux paux at the new White House.


The real tragedy is that, at such a desperate moment in our history, true conservatives have a vital role to play. Add together the bank bailouts, the stimulus package and the Obama budget, and what you get is a massive borrowing plan destined to impact the lives of every taxpayer for a generation. What the country needs from the opposition party (Republican) is an intellectually serious attempt to rein in unnecessary waste and spending. But the Republicans pissed away their credibility on fiscal conservatism over the past eight years and then monstrously compounded matters this year by leaning on their shovels and generally half-assing their way through the budget debate, saving the few bullets they had left for a freaking estate-tax exemption. Way to take your jobs seriously, you idiots. And you wonder why you lost the White House?


Hey BO - Problem solved

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09110/964155-84.stm
.
$150 million bucks for an airport that sees 3 commercial flights a day - all to DC too.
.
Let's put $100 milliion cut of a $3.6 Trillion dollar budget. That would be like a family that makes $100K per year cutting ONE Big Mac per year - not the whole the meal, just the sandwich. Pathetic.

"The agency figures it can save up to $52 over five years by buying in bulk." Mark, please tell me you are missing a word after the $52.

Conferences cost almost $700,000 per conference - that makes sense.


Wrong Terri. Each agency is cutting $100,000,000.00. And it adds up. Your Big Mac analogy is inaccurate also. Did you hear that one on Sean Hannity?? I thought so. Go back and relearn all that econ. you forgot, Terri.


During the Porkulus debate, Gibbs said that $8 billion (in spending) is minor.

So a month ago $8 billion was minor, but today $100 million is significant?

Only a Democrat with a patsy press corps can get away with such hypocrisy.


Its a joke, right? Does this hack of a President, really think that the people of the United States are stupid?.


Doogie,

Let's look at Mr. Silva's words above: "Cutting $100 million from their budgets in 90 days". Mr. Silva did not say "their individual budgets". The word "their" was used collectively.

However, let's assume you are correct. What would that give us, $100 nillion multiplied by about 20 cabinet members for $2 billion dollars. In my analogy, that would be about a cost savings of $60 for that $100K family. The suffering they must be feeling. Giving up a McDonalds meal once a month. Oh the humanity!!!

Missed Hannity last night, 24 was on.

That was a math problem, not an econ problem.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "z" in the field below:

Barack Obama
Want to see more photos? Click here

Play "Budget Hero"

Play Budget Hero

Latest polls

News, but funnier

Cartoon

Walt Handelsman

Cartoon

The Lowe- Down

Cartoon

Joe Fournier

Cartoon

Editorial cartoons

Quizzes

Rahm Emanuel

Know the real Rahm?

McCain

Presidential trivia