Rebels took out these electrical towers outside of Medellin, Colombia, a few years back, leaving the nation's second largest city without electricity. Security officials say the Chinese, Russians and others have been mapping the U.S. power grid. (AP Photo)
by Mark Silva
Here's another tale that begs the question: How safe are you feeling these days? Or, where will your tax dollars go?
"Cyberspies'' from China, Russia and other nations have "penetrated the U.S. electrical grid and left behind software programs that could be used to disrupt the system,'' current and former national-security officials tell the Wall Street Journal.
Is this a warning of new threats, coming from unidentified security experts, or a warm-up for the annual Intel budget battle?
These spies "were believed to be on a mission to navigate the U.S. electrical system and its controls,'' the Journal reports - with espionage which "appeared pervasive across the U.S.'' and not targeting any single region or power company. They haven't tried to damage the power grid or other key infrastructure, "but officials warned they could try during a crisis or war.''
"The Chinese have attempted to map our infrastructure, such as the electrical grid," a senior intelligence official is reported saying. "So have the Russians.''
"There are intrusions, and they are growing," a former Homeland Security office says. ""There were a lot last year."
Much of this was detected "not by the companies in charge of the infrastructure but by U.S. intelligence agencies,'' these officials are telling the Journal. "Intelligence officials worry about cyber attackers taking control of electrical facilities, a nuclear power plant or financial networks via the Internet.''
Now, in the Washington realm of the annual fight for a share of the $3.5 trillion federal budget - that "closing the Washington Monument'' mentality that sets in during this season -- it's worth noting, as the Journal does, that this tale has emerged at a time when:
"Protecting the electrical grid and other infrastructure is a key part of the Obama administration's cybersecurity review, which is to be completed next week,'' the Journal reports.
"Under the Bush administration, Congress approved $17 billion in secret funds to protect government networks, according to people familiar with the budget. The Obama administration is weighing whether to expand the program to address vulnerabilities in private computer networks, which would cost billions of dollars more. A senior Pentagon official said Tuesday the Pentagon has spent $100 million in the past six months repairing cyber damage.''
"Over the past several years, we have seen cyberattacks against critical infrastructures abroad, and many of our own infrastructures are as vulnerable as their foreign counterparts," Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair recently told lawmakers. "A number of nations, including Russia and China, can disrupt elements of the U.S. information infrastructure."
Time to start marking up those Intel budgets.









Comments
I would say that the spies have already been successful - they've even lobbied Emil (Com Ed) Jones into increasing their fees by 50% in the last 5 years! Maybe Jones is a spy?
Posted by: karl | April 8, 2009 9:33 AM
That WSJ piece has exactly one named source for these alleged attacks, and isn't accurate about that one. CIA analyst Tom Donahue didn't tell a conference last year a thing about cyber-extortion attacks on power grids - he wasn't there. The very first report about that conference makes that clear:
http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=205901631
The conference's organiser, who heads a company touting for cybersecurity work, said he'd a letter from Donahue but didn't produce it - and the CIA wouldn't comment to reporters at all on the story.
Which leaves the WSJ with a sourceless scary story at budget time.
Posted by: Steve Hynd | April 8, 2009 10:51 AM
Nonsense. There are no threats to us in the world – except Sarah Palin, Bobby Jindal, and Rush Limbaugh and the other conservative radio talkers. They are the real threats to this country – not make-believe possible attacks from our friends in Russia, China and the Muslim world. The only reason we think they are threats is because we are bad people who have forced them to take action to defend themselves against our aggressive, imperialist hegemonic crusade. Now that Obama is president, and we have announced that we will unilaterally disarm, they will all understand that we are their friends and love us again. After all, Obama's middle name is Hussein, his skin is dark and people around the world love him. What other proof do we need?
Posted by: JB | April 8, 2009 12:30 PM
I think it's wonderful that Mark Silva finally gets a little cynical about a proposed government spending program.
Did I miss the Silva article expressing a little cynicism about the 4 trillion in new spending that Obama is imposing? Did I miss the previous Silva articles expressing reservations about quoting unnamed sources?
Posted by: Arthur Henning | April 8, 2009 2:43 PM
What other proof do we need?
Posted by: JB | April 8, 2009 12:30 PM
Hmmmmm.After reading your post.....it seems proof is not what you need, just a little sense or a frontal lobotomy.
Posted by: bill r. | April 8, 2009 2:50 PM
No threats to us in the world? Do you know just how big the world is? We have plenty of threats. This is one. While there is a good chance that nothing will become of this, there is still a chance. I found some comfort in something I saw earlier, “…much of our infrastructure is actually older than the internet. It would take a hell of a computer program to start throwing the physical switches at 30 year old nuclear plants.” http://www.newsy.com/videos/u_s_power_grid_hacked/ But who's to say that the Russians and Chinese cannot create such a program?
Posted by: Craig | April 9, 2009 3:54 PM