Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Isfahan, south of Tehran, today. The Iranian leader said he welcomes talks with the United States, should the American president prove to be "honest" in extending its hand toward Iran. Photo by Amir Pourmandi / ISNA News Agency via AP)
by Mark Silva
The United States will take part in group talks with Iran about its suspect nuclear program, the Obama administration said today - a marked shift from the strategy of the Bush administration, which labeled Iran as part of the "Axis of Evil'' and generally refused to speak directly with Tehran.
And most Americans think that's a good idea, according to results of a new poll today.
The U.S. will be at the table "from now on" when senior diplomats from the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and Germany meet with Iranian officials to discuss the country's enrichment of nuclear material, the State Department says.
The Bush administration had generally shunned such meetings, although it attended one last year. The Iranian leader, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, said today that he welcomes talks with the United States, should the American president prove to be "honest" in extending its hand toward Iran. Photo
The U.S. believes that Iran's enrichment is aimed at building a nuclear bomb, while Iran maintains that it only has interest in a civilian nuclear power generating program.
The level of uranium-enrichment required for electrical power generation is far lower than that required for weapon-building. Most outside experts believe that Iran is within a few years of achieving the technology needed for weapons-grade enrichment.
The U.S. and Iran need to talk, the Obama administration says.
"We believe that pursuing very careful engagement on a range of issues that affect our interests and the interests of the world with Iran makes sense," says Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton (pictured at State today by J. Scott Applewhite / AP) - who took quite a different stance during her primary campaign against Obama. "There is nothing more important than trying to convince Iran to cease its efforts to obtain a nuclear weapon."
Most Americans believe that Iran poses a "long-term'' threat - 60 percent say so - rather than any immediate threat to the U.S. - 22 percent say immediate, in a poll that CNN and Opinion Research Corp. have conducted.
The CNN survey, taken before the administration spoke of taking part in meetings with Iran today, also found support for talking.
"Do you think Obama administration officials should hold diplomatic talks with the leaders of Iran in the next few weeks, or should they wait to hold diplomatic talks with Iran until that country makes significant changes in its policies towards other countries?'' the survey asked.
Talk with Iran, 59 percent said. Wait, 40 percent said.
The question was asked of 510 respondents in the CNN/Opinion Research poll run April 3-5, with a possible 4.5 percent margin of error.
Some say there is no room for error in the containment of any nuclear ambitions in Iran, whose leader says Israel has no right to exist.
Obama's willingness to talk with Tehran became a presidential campaign issue, particularly in the American Jewish community, where Republicans warned that Israel could be jeopardized by Obama's approach to the Iranians.
State Department spokesman Robert Wood said the administration's decision to take part in all talks was conveyed today in London to representatives of the "Group of Five'' plus one -- Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United Nations - that has been talking with Tehran.
"The U.S. remains committed to the P5+1 process; what is different is that the U.S. will join P5+1 discussions with Iran from now on," Wood said.
"If Iran accepts, we hope this will be the occasion to seriously engage Iran on how to break the logjam of recent years and work in a cooperative manner to resolve the outstanding international concerns about its nuclear program," he said. "Any breakthrough will be the result of the collective efforts of all the parties, including Iran."
Wire services contributed.









Comments
We don't need no stinking frenchified diplomacy. Diplomacy is for wimps. Real men, real americans shoot first and never ask questions. War is the first, best choice always. I'd support out troops fully if we invade Iran, North Korea, China, Syria, France and any other enemy. I myself am much to important to fight or sacrifice in any way, but I will put a "I support the troops" magnet on the back of my car. I love war, as long as some one else is out there fighting, like all real red blooded American hero patriots.
I'm off to go polish and caress my large arsenal of automatic weapons in case any of those commie, pinko, marxist, terrorist, socialist, islamofascists end up in my bedroom.
Posted by: Rushpublican | April 8, 2009 4:37 PM
Thank god we voted out the warmongering neocon BushCo thugs!
Posted by: ComeAsYouAre | April 8, 2009 4:46 PM
Hey here's a crazy idea! Let's sit at a table together to discuss our differences!
The only people that can oppose talking are those who benefit from the continued conflict in some manner, whether geopolitically or otherwise.
Posted by: Joe | April 8, 2009 4:49 PM
maybe BO can have three-way talks with the Somali pirates also.
Posted by: Terry | April 8, 2009 7:31 PM
“A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification.” ~George Washington, ~page 269 of The 5000 Year Leap.
“The nation which indulges toward another habitual hatred or habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interests." ~ George Washington
"Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none." ~ Thomas Jefferson
Posted by: Thomas | April 8, 2009 11:11 PM
Maybe those pirates will great us as liberators.
Posted by: bill r. | April 9, 2009 12:43 AM