by Mark Silva
"I personally... know the challenges of leading a busy life at work and at home, trying to do a good job at both -- and always feeling like you're not quite living up to either -- and trying not to pit one against the other, really trying to balance it so that... I call myself a 120-percenter.''
This was Michelle Obama, first lady, mother of two, pre-dawn walker of a new puppy, spokeswoman for volunteerism, one of Time's "100 most influential people,'' talking at a forum today in Washington.
"If I'm not doing any job at 120 percent, I think I'm failing,'' she allowed. "So if you're trying to do that at home and at work, you find it very difficult and stressful and frustrating.
"And even though my current life, trust me, is very different than it was and for most people -- and I do know that; I know that right now I am living, as challenging as it may seem, in a very blessed situation, because I have what most families don't have, is tons of support all around, not just my mother but staff and administration.
"I have a chief of staff and a personal assistant, and everyone needs that -- that's what we need,'' Obama said to laughter and applause. "Everyone should have a chief of staff and a set of personal assistants.''
In her lifetime, she said the idea of one breadwinner getting a family through the week has gone the way of modern economics:
"One income really doesn't always cut it anymore.''
In order to help families juggle the 120-percent demands of their work and home life, she said, the nation needs to embrace more flexible work schedules, work-site child-care, paid leave for birth or adoption and for serious illnesses.
(First Lady Michelle Obama apeared at the Time 100 Gala, a celebration of the magazine's "100 most influential people in the world,'' Tuesday in New York. Photo by Evan Agostini / AP. Obama visited the Sesame Street set for a taping of a Public Service Announcement with Elmo as part of Sesame Workshop's Healthy Habits For Life initiative, the same day, in New York. AP Photo / Sesame Workshop, Richard Termine)
"Things are very different for working families than when many of us were growing up,'' Obama said at the Corporate Voices for Working Families forum at the Mayflower Hotel. "I talked about this a lot on the campaign trail.
"When I look back on my childhood and the life that my parents provided, working-class folks with not a lot of money, my father was a blue-collar city worker who worked a shift job. But because he earned enough as a shift worker without a college degree, he could still support a family of four on that salary. And because he could, with that salary, support us -- we rented a home, we didn't live lavishly -- my mother was able to stay at home. She could afford to make the choice not to go to work while we were growing up. That was how families balanced back then.
"But things are very different today,'' she said. "One income really doesn't always cut it anymore. And that's in my lifetime. In most families, both parents have to work, and even if people want to make the choice to stay home. And again, there is no subjective analysis or -- of what is better. But people can't make the choice. It's even harder for single parents, and there are millions of them all across this country who are trying to build a life for themselves and their children, and they find in an economy that's tough that they're not just holding down one but they need a couple of jobs just to make ends meet.
"Twenty-two million working women don't have a single paid sick day. That means they lose money any time they have to stay home to take care of their kids.
"You know, imagine making that choice. And we do it all the time. And even when I had sick leave, I found myself, you know, hoping that the kids would stay well, just I couldn't afford to take the day off because there was a meeting, or something was going on. So your whole life is just contingent upon everything working perfectly. So imagine families who don't have any sick time. So if somebody gets sick, they have to take time off, and they lose the money that they can't afford...
"We need to discuss flexible work hours that give employees greater ability to attend to important family responsibilities like child pick-up, something as simple as that; doctors appointments for those not just with kids, but for people with elderly parents. We're finding more and more that families are in that crunch, as well.
"We need to discuss paid leave for birth or adoption of a child and when there's a serious illness that arises.
"We need to discuss quality on-site child care, something that keeps many of us up at night as families; you're just wondering where are we going to put our children where we feel like that they're being safe -- that they're safe and being loved. That will relieve many of the stresses that parents feel on the job throughout the day.
"These types of policies can be the key to whether a family remains economically viable or slips into financial uncertainty.
"I expect this day to be the first of what will be for me many conversations that I'll get a chance to participate in. We need to find ways to encourage other employers to follow your lead and adopt work-life policies that afford employees flexibility and much-needed support. We want to work together to make clear that, again, investing in these types of policies pays off for employers as well as the employees.''
So with that, I will stop and do what I love to do best, which is listen and learn. So thank you for having me. (Applause.)
END 10:34









Comments
I'm not knocking Michelle here, but there has been more coverage of her in just four months than there was of Laura Bush in 8 years (I realize the Swamp is only about 4 years old). Laura Bush is the mother of two, also had dogs (no dog can beat Barney, especially after he bit the rabid reporter), and heralded many a fine cause. But then Mark Silva didn't want to be adopted by the Bush family like he does the Obama family. Or is that Silva just publishes these things direct from the White House?
Posted by: John D | May 7, 2009 5:20 PM
More White House Propaganda;
its getting very boring.
Posted by: Inky | May 7, 2009 5:50 PM
I'm not knocking Michelle here
Posted by: John D | May 7, 2009 5:20 PM
.
Quit your crying sniveling Little Johnny.
Posted by: janet | May 7, 2009 5:53 PM
"I'm not knocking Michelle here...."
Posted by: John D
Why to you hate America, John D??
Posted by: Inky, jr. | May 7, 2009 5:59 PM
I like Laura Bush a great deal. But to be fair, there are many reason she generated less coverage. First, she seems like an intensely private person and thus less likely to generate press coverage. If you don't know she had a very tragic event in her youth and thus didn't seem to like to focus on her past much (she accidentally killed another person while driving). Moreover, her daughters were already essentailly out of the "house" ;when Mr. Bush took office, thus no discussion of child rearing or school choice, which are topics that generate great interest.
Posted by: J.A. | May 7, 2009 7:16 PM
Huh. Funny, people weren't so kind to Sarah Palin for juggling her career and family...........
Posted by: UnfrozenCavegirlBlogger | May 7, 2009 9:07 PM
I wonder if Oprah sent her any KFC coupons?
Paulo
Posted by: Paulo | May 7, 2009 11:34 PM
Serious stuff, here. Groundbreaking.
The story Mark Silva was born to write.
The kind of blockbuster story Pulitzer Prizes are awarded for.
Posted by: Rodney Daingerfield | May 8, 2009 8:51 AM
I wonder if Oprah sent her any KFC coupons?
Paulo
Posted by: Paulo | May 7, 2009 11:34 PM
Still loving that fried chicken innuendo...huh?
Posted by: bill r. | May 8, 2009 9:09 AM
Besides the comment above about her youth, I believe Laura Bush didn't get much coverage in the beginning because her daughters were hogging all of the press with their partying, underage drinking and bar hopping. So Laura sort of hid from the press so she wouldn't have to answer questions about her children's behavior. Michelle came out of the box on a positive note. I'm not knocking Laura I'm just saying.
Posted by: PH | May 8, 2009 11:32 AM
Laura Bush didn't get the coverage because she said no to the coverage, she didn't want to be front and center, Michelle, on the other hand, was born for the spotlight and fills it magnificently!
Posted by: tinat | May 8, 2009 1:42 PM
It's a picky thing, for which I apologize off the bat, but every time I hear somebody saying they're giving more than 100% effort to anything, I want to smack them one. ASIDE from the overuse and cliche, it's logically impossible (hence my "literal" mind goes into overdrive) for anyone to give more than 100% of their effort. 100% is pretty much ALL YOU HAVE to give. I keep wondering -- if they say they're giving 120% NOW, is that only because they were giving no more than 80% before? Or are they putting the extra 20% on some kind of credit card?
.
Okay, okay. I'll stop with this. Please understand it's coming from a grammar-geek who's given 200% effort to have misuse of the semicolon declared a Federal offense punishable by death.
Posted by: Op109 | May 9, 2009 8:35 AM
Mrs. Obama's comments about being a "120-percenter" rings true with Mompreneurs everywhere. We all want to be the perfect Mom, Wife, Grandma, Friend and Business Person. Her candid comments about how much easier it is for her, as the First Lady, help validate her honest and make me want to really listen to the issues she presents.
Posted by: Laurie Cohen | May 10, 2009 4:00 PM