President Barack Obama and German Chancellor Angela Merkel leaving a joint news conference in the East Room of the White House. (Photo by Saul Loeb / AFP / Getty Images)
by Mark Silva
President Barack Obama said today that expected House passage of an energy bill controlling greenhouse gas emissions will affirm an American "commitment'' to combating global warming, and German Chancellor Angela Merkel called it "a sea change'' in U.S. policy.
The two leaders, speaking at a joint news conference following a private meeting at the White House, also reaffirmed their commitment to preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon and voiced their common outrage over Iran's violent suppression of election protestors.
This was the third time that Obama and Merkel had met since Obama's election - though they had met once during Obama's campaign for president. And the two will meet again soon, at a summit for the leaders of the Group of Eight industrial nations in Italy in early July, and at a Group of 20 summit planned in Pittsburgh in September.
Merkel and other European leaders have been critical of the U.S. spending strategy for stimulus of a recession-bound economy.
And Merkel and others long have pushed the U.S. to take a tougher stance on climate control - the European leaders had urged former President George W. Bush to support caps on greenhouse gas emissions that the Obama administration now is embracing with expected passage of an energy bill by the House today.
"I reiterated America's commitment to stand with Germany and lead in confronting the energy and environmental crisis,'' Obama said, with Merkel at his side in an East Room news conference following their meeting in the Oval Office. "It is my hope that the United States will match that commitment today.''
The energy legislation which House leaders hope to pass today features a "cap-and-trade" system of limiting heat-trapping greenhouse gas emissions that scientists blame for global warming.
Under this plan, major emitters of greenhouse gases -- including factories and power plants -- would have to obtain permits for their emissions or buy "offsets" to cover them. The number of permits are to decrease each year, reducing overall emissions by more than 80 percent by 2050. Most emitters would initially get free permits, but in later years would purchase them at auction.
"This is indeed a sea change,'' Merkel said of the bill, speaking through an interpreter at the joint news conference. "This really points to the fact that the United States really is very serious on climate.
"The fact that, with the United States, we stand where we are today is an enormous success, which I would not have thought possible a year ago,'' Merkel said, without naming the former president by name.
Both leaders were pressed on the treatment of protestors in Iran and asked how this will affect negotiations with Iran over its enrichment of nuclear material. Iran maintains that it is developing civilian nuclear power. The U.S. and European allies, certain that Iran is developing a bomb, insist that this must be prevented.
Asked about Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's demand that Obama apologize for interfering in Iranian affairs - or if Obama would like the Iranian to apologize for comparing Obama to Bush, Obama said: "I don't take Mr. Ahmadinejad's statements seriously about apologies, particularly given the fact that the United States has gone out of its way not to interfere with the election process in Iran.''
While he initially had concluded that there were not "significant differences'' between Iran's president and the opposition leader, Mir Hossein Mousavi, on "security issues,'' Obama said today that Mousavi has "been shown to capture the spirit and imagination of forces in Iran that were interested in opening up. He has become a representative of many of those people who are on the streets...
"I continue to believe that ultimately it's up to the Iranian people to make decisions about who their leaders are going to be,'' Obama said. But "a government that treats its own citizens with that kind of ruthlessness and violence and cannot deal with peaceful protestors... has moved outside of universal norms, international norms, that are important to uphold... What has happened in Iran is unacceptable.''
"Over the past few weeks, we have seen horrifying scenes, looking at how, for example, the security forces have dealt with demonstrators,'' Merkel said. "In this day and age of the 21st Century, Iran cannot count on the world community turning a blind eye on this.''
Asked how the protests will impede negotiations on the nuclear question, Obama said: "We are still waiting to see how the situation plays out.
"There is no doubt that the progress of any talks will be affected,'' he said, noting that European nations are continuing their talks with the Iranians. "We won't know how any potential (direct U.S.) dialog will be affected until we see what has happened in Iran.
"The clock is ticking. Iran is developing nuclear capacity at a fairly rapid clip,'' Obama said. "They have been doing so for some time.''
The two leaders discussed the broader situation in the Middle East, and also Obama's intention of closing the U.S.-run military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. While they discussed Germany's willingness to help, Obama said he had made no specific requests of Merkel and she had made no commitments.
A strengthening relationship between the two leaders also appears to be developing in these ongoing talks.
"I value her wisdom and her candor, and I admire very much her leadership and her pragmatic approach to getting things done,'' Obama said. "Part of the warmth I feel toward Germany is that I like Chancellor Merkel a lot... Chancellor Merkel is smart and practical, and I trust her when she says something.''









Comments
"I looked the man in the eye. I found him to be very straight forward and trustworthy and we had a very good dialogue. I was able to get a sense of his soul."
Posted by: Ikea | June 26, 2009 2:33 PM
Yes, global warming for a planet in which its temperatures have stayed the same or fallen in the past few years.
Hold onto your wallets people and also get ready for unemployment numbers in the high teens. All in the name of "climate change," or whatever it's being called today.
Posted by: John D | June 26, 2009 3:58 PM
Welcome to the 21st century. Maybe, now we can get a handle on climate change, instead of burying our head in the polluted air !! Thank God, Bush is out of there !! Now, America can focus on the real problems of our world, and our country, from global warming, to our dysfunctional healthcare system.
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME, ALIVE AND WHOLE. NOW.
Posted by: Don Fitzgerald, IL | June 26, 2009 4:10 PM
The clean coal lobby is against this because they didn't get enough, and because the investments for true renewables are enough to cut into their "market share" sooner than most people imagine.
It isn't a great bill, but it's good enough to pass and feel like something significant and meaningful is being done.
This is framework for future legislation, it's important to pass the bill, weak as it is, so that we have a framework in place that we can strengthen as more pressure accumulates for politicians to act.
After eight years of the Republican cretins doing nothing but legislating for their wars and tax cuts for their rich buddies, it sure is nice to finally be accomplishing things for the good of our country again.
Posted by: Teresa | June 26, 2009 7:03 PM
This Cap and Tax bill.
Who is going to be doing the trading? That would be Wall Street - the same people that the people that are favoring this bill have spent the past two years demonizing.
The dems are also trying to pass this off as a job creation bill. For every green job creating building windmills and solar panels there are jobs lost drilling for oil and mining coal. Also, I wonder if these green jobs are going to be unionized? Do you think these jobs will be as well paying as those in the petroleum industry?
Posted by: Terry | June 26, 2009 7:47 PM
"Hold onto your wallets people and also get ready for unemployment numbers in the high teens. All in the name of "climate change," or whatever it's being called today."
It's unlikely you even have a wallet after your feckless leader pilfered everything in it to pay for his disastrous wars. The country is in shambles because of the fiscal irresponsibility of YOUR party, a party that left behind record deficits and the worst job creation report in history. So don't whine to us about wallets and unemployment.
Posted by: Diane | June 26, 2009 9:45 PM
there are jobs lost drilling for oil and mining coal. Also, I wonder if these green jobs are going to be unionized? Do you think these jobs will be as well paying as those in the petroleum industry?
Posted by: Terry | June 26, 2009 7:47 PM
----------------------------------------
.
Sherri,
And as usual we get the same insane predictions from Republicans on exact numbers of jobs that would be lost if the bill passes. But of course, you cretins made the same kind of insane predictions about the stimulus bill. And the budget. And the 1993 Clinton stimulus package. And the Clinton budget. And Medicare. And Social Security, etc., etc., etc - you have no credibility left, period.
.
http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/232016/june-25-2009/commonsense-health-care-reform-infomercial
Posted by: you | June 27, 2009 12:42 AM
Trickled On You,
So far how has BO's stimulus bill done in creating jobs? I think he is down about 2 million, so he needs (the economy needs) to create 5 million jobs in 20 months.
Bill Clinton never passed a stimulus bill, he passed the largest income tax increase in history. He even admitted it wasn't going to balance the budget in 1995, but then Newt and boys came along to create his economic legacy. Billy was also helped by the take-off of sales in personal computers and the internet.
Medicare is costing more than LBJ ever imagined and is on the verge of bankruptcy.
Soc Security is also costing more then even FDR imagined. This ponzi schem has been saved by massive tax increases.
Once again - you lose any economic arguement you throw-up against me.
Posted by: Terry | June 27, 2009 1:05 PM
Posted by: John D | June 26, 2009 3:58 PM
******************
John D,
With your first hand knowledge of gases (particularly those from animal waste) and hot air (always in evidence in your posts), I would have thought you'd be more enlightened on this.
Posted by: Kenny Bunkport | June 27, 2009 1:43 PM
Once again - you lose any economic arguement you throw-up against me.
Posted by: Terry | June 27, 2009 1:05 PM
--------------------------------------
.
Mary,
You're a delusional sociopath on par with your hero Shrub Jr.
.
http://blogs.venturacountystar.com/greenberg/qqxsgFiscalConservative.jpg
Posted by: you | June 27, 2009 6:33 PM
Trickled On You,
The best you can do is Crayola pictures - why should I have expected more.
Posted by: Terry | June 28, 2009 4:38 AM