The sun sets behind modern buildings and mosque minarets in Cairo, Egypt., where President Barack Obama will deliver a long-promised address the the Muslim world on Thursday. (Photo by David Silverman/Getty Images)
by Mark Silva
The president's address to the Muslim world will be televised. And the White House will be placing President Barack Obama's words on other "platforms'' as well - namely the Internet.
At the same time, the White House is attempting to walk people back from any great expectations from one talk
"Obviously our goal is to ensure that the greatest number of people with an interest to see this -- not just through newspapers and television, but can see this through Websites,'' said Robert Gibbs, press secretary for the president, as the White House was preparing to pack up for its flight to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, tonight. Obama will deliver his long-promised speech from Cairo on Thursday.
"The Internet team here is working with a host of others to get this information to as many platforms as humanly possible so that people will get a chance all over the world to see what the president has to say,'' Gibbs said of an operation that already moves the president's weekly addresses on the White House's own Website.
.
Yet, at the same time, with just a quarter of the people in many Arab nations surveyed saying they hold a positive view of the new American leadership - still up, significantly from last summer - the White House is attempting to downplay expectations for any impact that this one address will have on its intended audience.
"The president has always looked at this as a process, not as a single point in time,'' Gibbs said. "And I think if you look at the efforts that the administration has undertaken thus far in terms of outreach -- whether it's in interviews, whether it's speeches, the speech in Turkey -- this is about resetting our relationship with the Muslim world.... (a world that Obama knows something about, as we reported in the politics of biography today._
"I think you'll hear the president say, we don't expect that everything will change after one speech. I think it will take a sustained effort and that's what the president is in for.''
So what's the benchmark for success?
"We see public polling that measures the perception of the country throughout the world, and particularly in the Muslim world,'' Gibbs said. "I think there will be a great effort on our part to distribute this through different means, social networking sites, in order to get this in front of as many eyes throughout the world as we can....
"I think our perception in the world is a big measurement by which to look at this,'' Gibbs said. "I think the willingness and to be able to work with countries on our common interests are important.
"The president sees this as a series of events, not something that may or may not be easily quantifiable at any given -- or after the end of one speech,'' he said. "Let's just say this... If the president thought one speech would cure that relationship I doubt we'd be giving that in June....
"What is important is that we demonstrate that the United States wants to pursue a different relationship and ensure that Muslims around the world understand the message of the United States: That we share common hopes and dreams, and that we can work together to fulfill those hopes and dreams, understanding that there are -- separating that from that the extremism and extremists that wish to do us harm. But I think the great -- as the president has often said, we have more in common than we have disagreement about, and I think that's what he wants to ensure that the vast majority of the Muslim world hears.''









Comments
Look, you don't have to down play anything for me. I heard his stance on the Israeli-Palestinian issue. He's won me over with his willingness to make a firmer stand on the role of both parties. He seems excited. I don't think it will part the Red Sea, but it is oh-so refreshing to hear something akin to the beacon of light of the previous administration-- just less beacon of light.
Posted by: hmm | June 2, 2009 6:54 PM
In the last eight years Conservative interest groups that enjoyed access to the Bush administration sought to facilitate their agenda and interests by vilifying Islam and Muslims in general.
They did so very successfully. It is clear to me that many of the abominations committed during the last eight years of BushCo, including the horrible wickedness we see in Iraq, were committed by individuals whose willingness was influenced by injurious pervasive rhetoric on Islam. The vilification of Islam and Muslims greased the wheels for BushCo's use of torture and their committing of war crimes.
Words like "islamofascism" and "feminazi" are used by partisan hacks like "President" Gingrich, Boss Limbaugh, Sean Hannity etc to appeal to the low IQ deadenders of what's left of the GOP base and it sounds stupid to anyone who knows the first thing about Islam, which they don't.
Posted by: Gina | June 2, 2009 7:11 PM
Words like "islamofascism" and "feminazi" are used by partisan hacks like "President" Gingrich, Boss Limbaugh, Sean Hannity etc to appeal to the low IQ deadenders of what's left of the GOP base and it sounds stupid to anyone who knows the first thing about Islam, which they don't.
Posted by: Gina | June 2, 2009 7:11 PM
Kind of like how you people refer to conservatives as neo-cons, wingnuts and knuckldraggers?? Is it a war crime when "Islamofascists" cut our soldiers heads off? or is that BushCo's fault too?
Posted by: Joe | June 2, 2009 11:03 PM
Joe---When did neo-con become a derogatory term? It was precisely the defenders of the Bush Doctrine like Bill Kristol who define themselves by this term. So are you now disowning Wolfowitz, Kristol, et al.? They would be sad to know that they are no longer conservatives.
Posted by: ChiTown | June 3, 2009 9:02 AM
Joe, Yes it is a crime. It doesn't matter who chops off heads or tortures it's wrong. It's wrong if an Iraqi does it, it's wrong if and American does it. It's wrong if a Muslim does it. It's wrong if a Christian does it. What part of that is too difficult for you to understand?
Posted by: Nick | June 3, 2009 9:09 AM