by Mark Silva
Michelle Obama is on the ground.
And President Barack Obama will land Friday morning.
The first lady landed this morning in Copenhagen, where the International Olympic Committee will decide on Friday who gets the 2016 summer games -- Chicago, Rio de Janeiro, Madrid or Tokyo. She plans to lobby members of the committee in the runup to Friday's meeting, where the president will join her before the committee.
![]()
She landed a little before 11:30 a.m. local time, and was greeted by a Chicago-promoting contingency that included Chicago Mayor Richard Daley, his wife, Maggie, Olympic gold medalist Jackie Joyner-Kersee and Chicago 2016 president Lori Healey.
In her bid for her hometown, her husband will join her Friday morning -- leaving Thursday night, Washington time, and spending about four hours on the ground there. "I will sleep on the plane,'' the president says.
Republicans, Sen. Kit Bond of Missouri and RNC Chairman Michael Steele among them, are suggesting that there is something rotten about the president going to Denmark with all that's going on at home, in Afghanistan and Iran.
The White House, as the Washington Bureau's Peter Nicholas writes this morning, has a question for the critics:
"You don't think America should host the Olympics?''
A White House aide trotted out that argument against Bond: "What does Sen. Bond have against the Olympics coming to America?" spokesman Tommy Vietor asked. And White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs had harsh words for Steele: "Who's [Steele] rooting for? Is he hoping to hop a plane to Brazil and catch the Olympics in Rio? Maybe it's Madrid."
(First Lady Michelle Obama is pictured above arriving in Copenhagen today, Chicago Tribune photo by Michael Tercha). See the Copenhagen story in Tribune newspapers and here in the Swamp:.
by Peter Nicholas
Reporting from Washington
For those arguing that President Obama is neglecting important work by flying to Denmark in support of Chicago's Olympics bid, the White House has settled on an answer:
You don't think America should host the Olympics?
A White House aide trotted out that argument against Republican Sen. Christopher S. Bond of Missouri, who said this week that the president should stay put and consult his generals about the state of the war in Afghanistan.
"What does Sen. Bond have against the Olympics coming to America?" spokesman Tommy Vietor asked.
Echoing that line, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs had harsh words for Republican National Committee leader Michael Steele, who said Tuesday that Obama needed to focus on jobs, not the 2016 Olympics.
Steele told reporters in a conference call: "I think, while it's a noble idea for the president to want to pitch his home city, Chi-town, for the Olympics -- and, of course, America would be more than honored to host the Olympics in the future -- I think that at a time of war, I think at a time of recession, at a time where Americans have expressed rather significantly their concerns and frustrations over the course of the spring and summer about healthcare . . . this trip, while nice, is not necessary for the president."
A couple of hours later, at his daily briefing, Gibbs got his say: "Who's [Steele] rooting for? Is he hoping to hop a plane to Brazil and catch the Olympics in Rio? Maybe it's Madrid."
Obama plans to leave for Copenhagen on Thursday night, arriving shortly before Chicago makes its formal pitch to the International Olympic Committee. The president will take part in a question-and-answer session and mingle with IOC members in hopes of influencing a few votes.
While casting the president's mission as a patriotic act may serve to preempt some criticism, the White House previously had signaled concern over how such a trip would look. Obama himself suggested earlier this month that he would skip the trip because of the raging healthcare debate. Sending First Lady Michelle Obama would suffice, he said.
But, arguing that healthcare legislation is on track, the White House now says the president can afford to leave town.
It won't be a sightseeing trip, however. Obama will be on the ground in Denmark for just four or five hours, returning to Washington on Friday. He isn't even staying for the final IOC vote, which will take place after the cities still in contention make their cases Friday.
But looking for traction, some Republicans are hoping that the Copenhagen visit strikes Americans as frivolous, given the sour economy and reports that Iran is operating a covert nuclear facility.
After Gibbs spoke, a Steele spokesman took another swipe.
"The RNC chairman is rooting for the president to focus on job creation," said Trevor Francis, RNC communications director. "Going to Copenhagen won't help turn that tide of job loss."
peter.nicholas@latimes.com
Copyright © 2009, The Los Angeles Times





Comments
Can they keep her?
Posted by: Jack | September 30, 2009 7:46 AM
Many of us who reside in Chicago have concerns about the Olympic bid.
If Chicago receives the bid to host the Olympics I hope that President Obama promises to retain Patrick Fitzgerald as United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois for the next seven years. This will help prevent the corrupt practices of the Chicago machine during this time!
Posted by: Pat H | September 30, 2009 7:54 AM
It would be interesting if just once, any Republican would agree with the President about anything. I think that they are constitutionally incapable of doing so. And if they did, they'd be run out of their party as a RINO
Posted by: David | September 30, 2009 8:29 AM
If Chicago wins the Olympics, some preliminary soccer matches would be played at the EdwardJones Dome in... St. Louis. Do Sen. Bond's constituents know that he is opposed to his state benefiting from the Games?
Posted by: DJ | September 30, 2009 8:40 AM
Any luck at all and Chicago won't have to endure this.
The whole Olympic theme of building new venues every four years is ridiculous. Talk about a huge carbon footprint!
Cities all over the world now have expensive, empty complexes serving no useful purpose.
Solution:
Hold the winter and summer games at already established venues throughout the world. Every major country already has these facilities.
Posted by: C.Morris✧ | September 30, 2009 8:53 AM
Looks like Obama is determine to go and and tale the lime light away from Daley and Ryan who did all the work, less we forget Obama is the messiah.
Posted by: Inky | September 30, 2009 9:31 AM
The one good thing about Barack Obama going to Denmark is that he can't do anymore damage to the country while he's away. Can someone PLEASE invite Pelosi and Reid?
Posted by: Phil Anderer | September 30, 2009 9:34 AM
Daley has said no tax dollars are being used to go to Copenhagen, but the cost of Airforce 1 to travel overseas is well over 1 million dollars... Taxpayer money IS being used for this. Daley, like the president is a LIAR !!!!!
Posted by: bill | September 30, 2009 9:51 AM
No time to meet on Afghanistan but plenty of time to screw the taxpayers of Chicago. This isn't a patriotic issue, it is Chicago, not the US, that is on the hook for the massive cost overruns that happen on every single project developed by the city. Hey Gibbs, what is more patriotic, the Olympics or bringing our troops home alive?
Posted by: Hans | September 30, 2009 9:59 AM
Can they keep her?
Posted by: Jack | September 30, 2009 7:46 AM
We need more intelligent posts such as this. If more posters would take time to follow a thought process such as Jack, our world would be a better place. Thank you again Jack...your education has paid off.
Posted by: bill r. | September 30, 2009 10:34 AM
If Obama did not make a serious attempt to bring Olympic glory to United States soil Republicans would no doubt start chanting, "We knew it! He's an anti-American Muslim Communist! He hates America and all the jobs that would've been created!"
Posted by: devin | September 30, 2009 10:42 AM
Why did Mrs. Obama have to fly in a separate plane than her husband? So much for concern about leaving a carbon footprint. Her government plane required an accompanying backup plane, an advance staff with their plane, and a complete motorcade on the ground...all belching pollutants. And then all returning back to Washington. The shopping in Copenhagen can't be that good.
Posted by: Jamal | September 30, 2009 12:51 PM
This is a perfect opportunity for Europe to now snub and embarrass Obama. Paybacks are hell, huh?
Posted by: WhyAreLiberalWomenSoHomely | September 30, 2009 12:54 PM
This is a perfect opportunity for Europe to now snub and embarrass Obama. Paybacks are hell, huh?
Posted by: WhyAreLiberalWomenSoHomely | September 30, 2009 12:54 PM
I just don't see that happening...but you can hope.
Posted by: Whyareconservativemenhunglikemice | September 30, 2009 1:17 PM
Chicago will not be disappointed a lot if the Olympics goes somewhere else in 2016. It is one of the greatest cities in the World and will always have a good chance at hosting the Olympics. Chicago made dreams come true for many.
Posted by: forexthinker.com | September 30, 2009 8:15 PM
Did the irony of this post escape you all????
If Chicago receives the bid to host the Olympics I hope that President Obama promises to retain Patrick Fitzgerald as United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois for the next seven years. This will help prevent the corrupt practices of the Chicago machine during this time!
Obama is the Chicago machine. All his friends and associates will benefit from the Olympics. And just think of the billions of dollars floating around just waiting to find a friends pocket. Ah, payback; it's much more important than Afghanistan, or the 15 year old honor student that got beat to death in the street. Maybe Obama could take some time and address gangs and violence...nah no politican gain there.
Posted by: Gary | October 1, 2009 3:46 AM
I love the obama's I think there doing a great job and they should keep up the good work haters step back.
Posted by: Chris Brown | October 1, 2009 10:28 AM