by Mark Silva
In "the race to the top,'' no child will be left behind, we're assured, but a lot of low-performing teachers - as measured by the poor performance of their students - may be
The government has set aside $4.5 billion, as part of the $787-billion economic stimulus, to spur public schools toward better achievement. As states compete for grants under the "Race to the Top'' program, they are being held to a standard that took root during the Bush administration, with its requirements that schools demonstrate yearly progress, and has blossomed in the Obama administration, which also is setting measurements for progress.
And for both the No Child Left Behind initiative that Bush won during his first year in office and the Race to the Top initiative that Obama's Department of Education is sponsoring in his first year, that means more student testing. It's a clear indicator of the common goals at work that Jeb Bush, the former Florida governor and school reformer, and former president's brother, has heartily endorsed the work that Obama's education department is doing.
It has also, as the Associated Press reports in an analysis of a blossoming partnership underway in Washington, spawned a new joke:
"The real secretary of education is Bill Gates.''
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has become the biggest player in the school reform movement, spending around $200 million a year on grants to elementary and secondary education, the AP's Lbby Quaid and Donna Blankenship report. But now the foundation is taking "unprecedented steps to influence education policy, spending millions to influence how the federal government distributes nearly $5 billion in grants to overhaul public schools. The federal dollars are unprecedented, too.''
Since Obama secured the money as part of the economic stimulus to spur schools that are failing their students, the Gates Foundation has offered grants of $250,000 apiece to help states apply for the money - " so long as they agree with the foundation's approach.'' The administration and foundation share common goals: Paying schoolteachers based on the performance of their students, and that means testing, encouraging charter schools that operate independently of local school boards; and establishing a common academic standards adopted by every state.
The big teachers' unions are at odds with some of these goals. They complain that standardized testing has run amok. The Obama administration has directly confronted a constituency that has been a longtime ally of the Democrats, those teachers' unions.
"Despite growing evidence to the contrary, it appears the administration has decided that charter schools are the only answer to what ails America's public schools," the National Education Association, the largest teachers' union, said in comments about the grant competition submitted to the Education Department. "We should not continue the unhealthy focus on standardized tests as the primary evidence of student success, the NEA said. The American Federation of Teachers submitted similar comments. Together, the unions count about 4.6 million members.
Education Secretary Arne Duncan, the former superintendent of schools from Chicago, welcomes the foundation's involvement. "The more all of us are in the game of reform, the more all of us are pushing for dramatic improvement, the better," Duncan said in an interview with The Associated Press.
Duncan's inner circle includes two former Gates employees, the AP report notes. His chief of staff is Margot Rogers, who was special assistant to Gates' education director. Assistant Deputy Secretary James Shelton was a program director for Gates' education division. The administration has waived ethics rules to allow Rogers and Shelton to deal more freely with the foundation, but Rogers said she talks infrequently with her former colleagues.
"It's no secret the U.S. education system is failing," Bill Gates says in this report. "We're doing all kinds of experiments that are different. The Race To The Top is going to do many different ones. There's no group-think."
When the foundation offered to help states apply for the federal funding, it initially offered the $250,000 to only 15 states. Officials in other states complained when they learned of the plan. And the foundation to expand its offer, now agreeing to help any state that meets eight criteria, including a commitment to the common standards effort and the ability to link student data to teachers. The foundation also is helping some districts that are eligible for a share of the money if they are working in partnership with nonprofits such as the Gates Foundation.
The Department of Education has announced public meetings across the country "to listen and learn from assessment experts and practitioners,'' the agency says. "The goals are two-fold: first to gather technical input to inform the development of a Race to the Top Assessment Competition; and second to enable states, who will be the competition applicants, and the public to participate in and learn from these events.
"The next generation of assessments will provide information that helps accelerate student learning and improve teachers' practice," Duncan says. "At these meetings, experts will give us their best ideas so we can support states' efforts to build the new assessments our country needs to ensure that our students are prepared for success in college and careers."
in the Race to the Top, the agency says:
Duncan has pledged to reserve up to $350 million to support consortia of states that are working to create new assessments tied to a common set of standards. The grants will be distributed next year through a competitive process. The assessment grants will come from the $4.35 billion Race to the Top Fund and will be awarded under a separate program from the larger one designed to support states' comprehensive efforts to reform education.
Department officials will use the input gathered to design the application for the assessment competition; consortia of states, who are the applicants for the competition, will use the information to inform their proposed assessment designs. The department plans to publish the application early next year and will award grants by next fall.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act appropriated $4.35 billion for the Race to the Top Fund. The law requires the money to be distributed through four areas of reform:
Adopting college- and career-ready standards and assessments;
Recruiting, developing, rewarding, and retaining effective teachers and principals;
Building data systems that measure student success and inform teachers and principals about how they can improve their practices; and
Turning around our lowest-performing schools.
"To succeed in comprehensive efforts to reform, states need to have plans to address each of these areas," Duncan says. "But high-quality standards and assessments are the foundation on which reforms are built. High-quality assessments are one of the most important ingredients of reform. We look forward to supporting states as they lead the way in this critical effort."





Comments
As frontline teachers already know, today's education field is awash in a flood of "assessments," "studies", and other paperwork so vaste that nobody reads it and nobody pays attention to it.
So what does this program promise? More paperwork. In the words above,
"public meetings across the country "to listen and learn from assessment experts and practitioners,"
Grants of our tax money "to create new assessments"
"Build data systems"
"gather input"
"Propose assessment designs"
"publish" the application for this money "next year"
Prediction: The students won't benefit from this. The only beneficiairies will be the high-paid education consultants, and the education bureaucrats hired to process all this redundant paperwork.
Waste of time. Waste of money.
Posted by: John Dewey | October 25, 2009 11:53 AM
Arne Duncan says we don't have enough, or enough good, student/teacher assessments?????
I just did a search of the Tribune Archives since 1995, and found 4,326 Trib articles in which the words "School" and "assessment" appear. I found 3,669 articles in which the words "student" and "assessment" appear.
Do a google search for "school assessment" and you'll get 82 million hits. A search for "student assessment tests" gets 4.8 million hits. Those searches will yield a wide variety of existing assessment tools.
Sad fact is: We already have plenty of assessments, and plenty of assessment tools. Why would anyone think that Duncan's workshops will come up with something that hasn't already been thought of? This $4.35 billion will be wasted on education bureaucrats, papers no one reads, conferences only the in-group attends, and slush funds to politically connected unions. Any real decisions (good or bad) will be postponed at least another year while this process runs its course.
Posted by: John Dewey | October 25, 2009 1:58 PM
The federeal gov't should get out of the K-12 education process. Let the states handle this.
Posted by: Terry | October 26, 2009 8:04 AM
The student doesn't fail.....the teacher does. Damn where have I heard that before?
The attempt to measure student performance solely on teacher competence leaves a lot out and really pisses me off!!
Posted by: Olan Spears | October 26, 2009 8:51 AM
Terry, I agree. I'll go a step further. I don't think the federal DE should even exist. So much for a federal government with limited powers. Our federal government extends its tentacles into just about every area of our lives. The sad thing is that some people actually think big government is a good thing. They love big brother.
Posted by: Herbie H. | October 26, 2009 11:59 AM
HH,
Couldn't agree more. You can make a good correlation between the decline of American education and the establishment of the DE.
Actually, I would get gov't out of the education buisness. take all the money spent on education and provide vouchers - better results for less cash.
Posted by: Terry | October 26, 2009 1:27 PM
Obama is making a terrible mistake. Teachers are already ‘teaching the test’ because of “No Child Left Behind.” They will certainly continue to teach the test if, under Obama’s new plan, test results determine whether their jobs and schools survive. So far, teaching the test has not improved the education system. That’s because it doesn’t teach students how to learn, how to reason, or how to develop good, analytical and organizational skills. Thus, the only thing Obama’s plan is likely to guarantee is the continued failure of the nation’s public schools. Instead, maybe someone ought to look at what the Europeans do in their schools and try to duplicate the processes that account for their success.
Posted by: John W. | November 4, 2009 7:40 PM
Although there may already be an over abundance of test assessment data available, is any of it being used to improve the quality of our kids education? When you are trying to improve an end product, our kid’s education, do you ignore the impact that those producing the product have? If some books do not provide the information presented in a way students can comprehend, get rid of them and use books that work. If some teachers do not provide the information and present it in a way students can comprehend and advance, get rid of them and reward the teachers that make our kids education successful. If you can teach we should reward you, if you can’t teach, get out of the classroom. Our kids need to learn, not just be socially promoted and warehoused for 12 years.
Posted by: Ron | November 4, 2009 8:42 PM
Great idea to hold teachers accountable for a the child's test scores. I mean they do have that child for 6 hours, 1/4 of the entire day. That makes complete sense to hold them completely responsible for how a child performs. Brilliant!!!!!!! Nevermind that my school has an English Language learner population of 72%, not a factor. Maybe if I want to support my family I better start looking for that position in the affluent school. Although I have seen the tax dollars well spent on this data analysis recently. At our last staff meeting, a two month study by our district found that our English Language learners were performing poorly on the "English / Language arts" portion of the Test. Again brilliant!!!!! Money well spent.
Posted by: chris | November 5, 2009 4:55 PM
Education is a lot like religion. A kid needs to come to it on his own terms. The problem is we live in a society that wants to jam it down a kids throat. Education needs to be reformed, but we need to change not what we teach, but when we teach. Many kids at 14 do not understand the connection to education and future success. At 14 the future is a long way off. It might be best for some kids to do community service and physically, emotionally and intellectually mature.
Posted by: Hans Schmidt | December 17, 2009 6:20 PM
Since the 1980s we have had a string of political and economic problems that have affected education. Rather than solve these underlying problems it appears that we are going to pour money into the assessment business, and rely on Federal programs like Race To The Top (RT3). All forms of testing and assessment extract energy and money from the system. In connection with RT3, I would think that distributing Federal education funds based on competition as opposed to need would be unconstitutional. Also RT3 holds children hostage to a State's political philosophy and to any peculiarities in judging the competition. I would suggest that the first steps in fixing the system would be to insure that every teacher has appropriate sized classes, a first class educational environment, and a reasonable wage. For students I would recommend a TLC environment with proper nutrition, parents with jobs that provide a reasonable income for the hours worked, and a home not in foreclosure.
Posted by: bpeterson1931 | January 24, 2010 1:54 PM