by Christi Parsons
Declaring that there should be "no excuse for mediocrity" in public schools, President Obama this afternoon pledged to push for recruitment of better teachers, better pay for those who succeed and dismissal of those who let their students down.
When principals are trying to determine which teachers are doing well, he said, they should be able to consider student performance as part of the evaluation.
And when schools are failing, "they should be shut down," Obama said. "But when innovative public schools are succeeding, they shouldn't be stifled, they should be supported."
The president's tough words - fighting words, for some union officials - came as Obama spoke to students and teachers at a charter middle school here.
But as he announced the criteria by which states can win grants from his Department of Education's $4.35-billion "Race to the Top" fund, Obama spelled out standards that depart from conventional Democratic dogma.
For one thing, Obama called for the abolition of "firewall" rules, which presently prevent many schools from judging teacher performance based on student performance.
To win the grant money, hey'll also have to develop internationally competitive standards, find innovative ways to recruit educators and track progress of students to make sure every child graduates ready for college.
"If a state wants to increase its chances of actually winning a grant, it will have to do more," Obama said. "It will have to collect information about how students are doing in a particular year - and over the course of an academic career - and make this information available to teachers so they can use it to improve the way they teach. That's how teachers can determine what they should be doing differently in the classroom. That's how principals can determine what changes need to be made in our schools."
The president delivered his remarks at the James C. Wright Middle School, on the one-year anniversary of his election at president. The address came as national Democrats are trying to read the results of a more recent set of elections, those held Tuesday, and to figure out how the party should move forward in preparation for the 2010 mid-term elections.
Obama made it clear how he thinks they should proceed. He underscored an argument about improving the American economy, and folded in his pre-planned speech about education as part of his argument about how to achieve sustainable prosperity.
In an unusual step for the president, he also went off-script for a few moments, telling of a C-grade that his older daughter Malia brought home from school recently. It didn't meet the standards at the Obama home, he said, and Malia knew it.
More recently, she came home with a score of 95, as the president told the story.
"What was happening was, she had started wanting it more than us," he said. "Once you get to that point, our kids are on our way."
The president challenged parents to set a high bar at home, but he also pledged support from the government in demanding the same of public schools.
"In the 21st Century, when countries that out-educate us today will outcompete us tomorrow," he said, "there is nothing that will determine the quality of our future as a nation or the lives our children will lead more than the kind of education we provide them."









Comments
This is bad news for the Red States.
If you can recite half of the alphabet by the time you're 18 in the South, you're considered a genius and possible presidential material.
Posted by: DrainYou | November 4, 2009 4:25 PM
Don't think Obam will have much luck bettering public schools until, he , which he proably won't, can tone down the teachers union.
Posted by: Inky | November 4, 2009 4:45 PM
By the way, Barry, how are the girls doing in their elite DC school?
Posted by: JoAnne | November 4, 2009 5:07 PM
By the way, Barry, how are the girls doing in their elite DC school?
Posted by: JoAnne | November 4, 2009 5:07 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Teresa,
They're probably doing better than Bush Jr did at his elite prep school. Although Bush Jr was a good cheerleader.
http://www.infowars.com/images2/Bush/cheerleader.jpg
Posted by: K | November 4, 2009 6:01 PM
Inky,
The LAST thing a Wingnut rube like you should be commenting on is education.
Posted by: Stinky | November 4, 2009 6:04 PM
Get the federal gov't out of K-12 education. There is no reason for it - states are capable.
Posted by: Terry | November 4, 2009 8:08 PM
Get the federal gov't out of K-12 education. There is no reason for it - states are capable.
Posted by: Terry | November 4, 2009 8:08 PM
_____________________
Why's that Teabaggy?
So our youth can become low IQ home schooled goobers like you? The kind who think the earth is flat and jesus rode a dinosaur?
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_06mkARtmC1E/SkUC9-2_epI/AAAAAAAAATo/Y8jOdRBXv34/s400/football_jebus.jpg
Thanks, but no thanks...
Posted by: Terry is a girls name | November 4, 2009 10:28 PM
Oh you liberals are doing a great job in inner city schools all across the nation. Chicago is great with railroad ties. Los Angeles has a 60% dropout or failure rate in a district where liberals control the agenda, GOOD JOB.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-06-20-dropout-rates_x.htm
Then there is Detroit at an absolutely stunning graduation sucess rate of 22% and the biggest of big government school districts in New York City where the liberals can claim 38% graduation rate.
You liberal goobers are the ignorant ones. Take your preconceived ideas about the South and look around your own neighborhoods. Your kids are the ones that can't add and have no critical thinking skills, but then neither do you, so never mind...
Posted by: Gary | November 5, 2009 3:49 AM
I'd like to see Obama's salary tied to Obama's performance....
Posted by: Change in 2010 | November 5, 2009 8:46 AM
Change 2010 he'd owe us money if that were the case
Posted by: Chi-Town | November 5, 2009 12:33 PM
Inky,
The LAST thing a Wingnut rube like you should be commenting on is education.
Posted by: Stinky | November 4, 2009 6:04 PM
Stinky in your world only wing nuts speak the truth, why don't you give it a try.
Posted by: Inky | November 5, 2009 4:57 PM
Trickled On John E,
You are Exhibit One for what happens when the federal gov't interfers with something.
Why don't you trust your local and state gov'ts?
Posted by: Terry | November 5, 2009 7:06 PM