Climate change: Working in the dark?: The Swamp
The Swamp
Chicago Tribune

It's crunch time in Copenhagen, where the winter sun sets before Four.

Posted December 14, 2009 2:15 PM
Al Gore in Copenhagen.jpg

Former Vice President Al Gore, right, hears from Norway Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Store before the presentation of a report on the melting of the Greenland ice sheet, at the Bella center of Copenhagen today, the eighth day of the U.N. Climate Change Conference. (Photo by Attila Kisbenedek / AFP / Getty Images.)

The Swamp

by Jim Tankersley

COPENHAGEN - Something is melodramatic in Denmark.

For what felt like the umpteenth time since the international climate summit began here last week, a floor protest briefly shut down the negotiations today - at least in public.

This time, it was a group of African nations, led by Sudan, which lodged a procedural protest over fears that the talks will result in an abandonment of the 1997 Kyoto Protocol.

International media reacted breathlessly, as they did during similar temporary shut-downs last week, chronicling the public negotiating roller-coaster with all the intrigue of Shakespeare himself.

Meanwhile, delegates continued to talk behind the scenes. U.S. officials downplayed the impact on the conference's ultimate goal, an agreement that would pave the way to a new global warming treaty.

And by early evening, environmentalists who work closely with the negotiators reported the situation resolved, and diplomats prepared for what could be an overnight bargaining session, attempting to hammer out a compromise on key areas of the agreement.

With heads of state set to start arriving in the next day or two, now is when the real work ramps up, negotiating veterans say.

"You know it's getting serious when they start working in the dark," said David Doniger, clean air policy director for the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Lucky for them, the winter sun sets here before 4 p.m. here.

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

Please John D, post a deranged rant where you simultaneously claim you've repeatedly stated that the Earth has been cooling over the last several years but also over the last several years the Earth (and Mars) is experiencing warming due to increased solar activity. Please quote a meteorologist from South Carolina as well.


Al Gore to Jonas Gahr Store: "There's no way I'm going to pull your finger. I'm not falling for that again."


Caption to the Photo:

"About the Nobel we gave you a few years ago, can we have it back?"

Working in the Dark? I guess that's what's happens when you don't use the facts and make things up as you go along.


THE AP DESTROYS THE RIGHTS PHONY CLIMATEGATE SCANDAL!


In a piece that was just posted today, the AP, after having objectively reviewed the emails from "Climategate" comes out unequivocally on the side of Truth.


"The 1,073 e-mails examined by the AP show that scientists harbored private doubts, however slight and fleeting, even as they told the world they were certain about climate change. However, the exchanges don't undercut the vast body of evidence showing the world is warming because of man-made greenhouse gas emissions."
.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091212/ap_on_sc/climate_e_mails



The emails at the heart of SwiftHack were obtained from the Climatic Research Unit of a British university, and the basic conclusions of that university's work have been independently corroborated by three sets of American and Japanese researchers. The phony Republican "complaints" amount to what they usually do - crap
.
http://enviroknow.com/2009/11/25/climategate-the-swifthack-scandal-what-you-need-to-know/
.


I always find it amazing the way the right wing "real Americans" will fight tooth and nail for the right to continue to get screwed over by Big Oil and the Corporate Health Insurance Industry etc.



In the annals of right-wing hubris, the "climategate" sham should be given recognition. For years, the deniers have intentionally engaged in a disinformation campaign to mislead and confuse the public about the existence and gravity of climate change. Two lawsuits were filed that included a cause of action for climate change civil conspiracy. The right-wing likes to flip things upside down, so now they cry that scientists have been part of a conspiracy to defraud the public into believing that global warming is real.


WATCH - as leading right wing cave dweller James Inhofe tries to make the case, but ends up getting his butt handed to him during this interview.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGRsxP84Kx0


Troglodyte Terri,
You can't even spell, why should we listen to anything you have to say regarding climate change?


TrickledOn,

You can't even think, why should we believe anything you have to say regarding ... anything?


Al Gore may be an imperfect messenger, but his understanding of climate change is steeped in science. He's written books about it. Books that he not only read, but actually wrote. He won a Nobel Peace Prize for his work explaining climate change and trying to get the world to deal with it. In contrast, who's leading the charge for the right wing climate change deniers?.....Sarah Palin and her nitwit ramblings of ignorant anti-intellectuallism that she posted on her Facebook page.


Palin has no understanding of climate change, whatsoever. Not only does she not understand the science of climate change, she doesn't appear to understand even the most basic of science. Nothing in her resume credibly qualifies her to discuss climate change. To be kind, one could say that her best and most consistent professional qualification is that of a quitter. She's not very good at it, but she does have plenty of experience.


Sarah Palin is dumber than a bag of rocks, if she doesn't believe in it then I have no doubt whatsoever that climate change is real and it's dangerous.



Terry, John D (D for dumb) and the rest of you ignorant and selfish right wing nut jobs...Can you explain to me whats in it for ALL the world leaders and 99% of the world scientists to make Global Warming up??? Please emlighten me whats in it for them? Also, why do you patriotic nutjobs insist on continuing to give our hard earned money to the middle east terrorist regimes that we buy oil from? WHY?? And by the way that includes Saudi Arabia which harbours terrorists and trains them and supports them as well. You know, Saudi Arabia, the hand that Bush kissed!


Perpetually Dumb Dumb Janet, the LAST 2 years, Earth has been cooling. Never said anything about Mars cooling the last 2 years. Perhaps you might know during one of your LSD trips.
Up until the last 2 years, Perpetually Dumb Dumb Janet, when solar flare activity was high, yes, Mars was warming up. This according to NASA. In the past 10 years, PDD Janet, Earth's temps have stabilized. Just about ALL scientists are in agreement on this. In fact, global warming scientists "are perplexed as to why temps have stabilized and cooled the past 2 years."

Anyway, here is a littany of facts for you to digest:
June in Manhattan averaged 67.5 degrees Fahrenheit, 3.7 degrees below normal — the coldest average since 1958. The National Weather Service stated on July 1: “The last time that Central Park hit 85 in May . . . but not in June was back in 1903.”

In Phoenix, June’s high temperatures were below 100 degrees for 15 days straight, the first such June since 1913. In California’s desert, Yucca Valley’s June average was 83.5, 8.5 degrees below normal. Not far away, downtown Los Angeles averaged 74.5 degrees, five below normal.
Boston saw temperatures 4.7 degrees below normal. “This is the second coldest average high temp since 1872,” veteran meteorologist and Weather Channel alumnus Joseph D’Aleo reports at Icecap.com. “1903 is the record.” D’Aleo told me, “It has been so cool and so cloudy that trees in northern New England are starting to show colors that normally first appear in September.” Looking abroad, D’Aleo noted: “Southern Brazil had one of the coldest Junes in decades, and New Zealand has had unusual cold and snow again this year.”

New Zealand’s National Climate Centre issued a June 2 press release headlined, “TEMPERATURE: LOWEST EVER FOR MAY FOR MANY AREAS, COLDER THAN NORMAL FOR ALL.”

South African officials say cold weather killed two vagrants in the Eastern Cape. Both slept outdoors the evening of June 26 and froze to death.

July also has been more than a bit brisk.

“FREAK SUMMER STORM DUMPS SNOW ON YONKERS,” the New York Post blared after a July 8 storm brought a wintry mix to that city just north of Gotham. That same day, the high temperature reached 65 degrees at O’Hare International Airport, making it Chicago’s coldest July 8 since 1891. Meanwhile, in Melbourne, Australia, temperatures have been 10 degrees below average, while frost has covered lawns and windshields.

By the way, Janet, not only did Chicago suffer through one of the coldest Octobers on record, but do did much of the nation.
And before you and your ilk chime that there is more to the planet than North America, parts of Australia saw snow recently, which is to be their summer now:
http://www.weatherzone.com.au/news/a-snowy-dusting-in-victorias-summer/13262

These charts may be too complicated for you, but I'll try anyway:
http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Correlation_Last_Decade.pdf

Perpetually Dumb Dumb Janet, go back to your hole and stop embarrassing yourself.


MEMO TO THE USEFUL RIGHT WING IDIOTS OF THE ANTI - CLIMATE CHANGE MOUTH PIECES OF BIG OIL:
.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/6768364/Giant-iceberg-heading-for-Australia.html


I suppose this is a made up story, right ???



MediaCurves.com conducted a study among 314 Americans viewing a news clip on the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. Results found that the majority (72%) indicated that the United States should increase its efforts to prevent and prepare for climate change. After viewing the video, support for the statement that there is scientific evidence that the average temperature on the earth has been rising over the past few decades rose from 60% to 68% among viewers.More in depth results can be seen at:
http://www.mediacurves.com/Politics/J7672-ClimateChangeCopenhagen/



Tony,

What most socialists want over their populations - control and money. The more the gov't can regulate, the more control and money they have to do what they think is best and to reward themselves.

Us conservatives don't want to give American money to Saudi princes for their oil, but since you left-wing wackjobs won't let American companies drill in America, that doesn't leave a lot of options.

BTW, why don't the environmentalists care about the "harm" to the environment in Saudi Arabia from oil drilling?


****************************************************
Perpetually Dumb Dumb Janet, go back to your hole and stop embarrassing yourself.

Posted by: John D, still right, as usual | December 14, 2009 4:49 PM
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _


It's always amusing to watch "award winning climatologist" Johnny D cutting and pasting crap from the anti scientists who are funded by Big Oil.


If ignorant right wing tools like Johnny D didn't exist, the corporate loving Repug Party would have already gone the way of the Whigs.


Why don't you go shave your back hair and let the adults handle this, Johnny.



CO-AUTHOR OF IIPC DRIVEL SAYS IT'S CRAP:

"It isn’t necessary to list all the changes I have identified between what the scientists actually said and what the policy makers who wrote the Summary for Policy Makers said they said. The process is so flawed that the result is tantamount to fraud. As an authority, the IPCC should be consigned to the scrapheap without delay."

http://www.businessday.co.za/articles/Content.aspx?id=87726


WAIT, I THOUGHT IT WAS GETTING WORSE AND WORSE . . .
*
Natural disasters at decade low in 2009-UN report
*
http://alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/LDE5BD0W0.htm


NO REALLY, HIDE THE DECLINE!!!
*
CRU takes down Briffa Tree Ring Data and more
*
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/14/whats-going-on-cru-takes-down-briffa-tree-ring-data-and-more/


Little Johnny D,
You're right! You never did say that Mars has been cooling over the last 2 years. But neither did I!!! You did say this though:
;
Also, scientists say in the past 20+ years sunspot activity has been pretty active, which many say accounts for the warmer temps. More sunspot activity means more radiation entering the atmosphere. Hence, temps on Earth AND Mars have risen lately!

Posted by: John D | March 28, 2008 9:21 AM
;
So basically you had been agreeing w/ many Republicans and were saying that the Earth was warming but it was not the result of man made activity. You said it was solar flares! Now that the United States had a cool and wet summer season, you've claimed that the warming trends were over when the facts say otherwise:
;
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2009/20090113_ncdcstats.html
;
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080116114150.htm
;
Since its doubtful you will read this link it shows that 2008 was the 10th WARMEST year on record and 2007 was the 2nd WARMEST year. So yes I guess you could say that over the last "couple of years, there has been a cooling trend because it went from the 2nd hottest to the 10th and then 2009 will not crack the top 10 warmest but as you can see your claim is meaningless when you look at the big picture. Peace!


Gore's a joke.
An expensive joke.
Copenhagen, with its godzilla-sized carbon footprint, is even more of a joke.
A $215 million joke.
The DNC Swamp's one-sided coverage of this, is itself a joke.


Mr. John D,
Perhaps you can explain why the polar ice caps are still melting. Cheerio!


Posted by: John D, still right, as usual | December 14, 2009 4:49 PM

You still havent answered my question regarding how do you explain the excellerated rate at which the ice caps are melting and receeding? Enlighten us liberal loons please.


John,

Do you have yet another scientist to cite that has also been funded by Exxon? Please keep them coming.


More bits of intelligent commentary from Silva's Merry Band of Misfits:

Troglodyte Terri,
You can't even spell, why should we listen to anything you have to say regarding climate change?

Posted by: terry is a girls name | December 14, 2009 3:03 PM

Ahhh, another example of the most worthless and worst that mankind has to offer.


And before you and your ilk chime that there is more to the planet than North America, parts of Australia saw snow recently, which is to be their summer now:

Posted by: John D, still right, as usual | December 14, 2009 4:49 PM

And that doesn't seem strange to you Johnny Dumb Dumb? Snow in Autralia in the summer if that isnt a sure sign of climate change caused by global warming then nothing is!
I hate to be cruel but you're an imbicile.


To celebrate the beginning of the second week of the "brokenhagen" climate change socialist fest, I thought it would be a good time for me to reinforce the climate denier manifesto. Taking these 16 statements to heart will serve you well as you join forces with Lord Monckton and Wingnut Senator James Inhofe to obfuscate and vociferate about the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on humankind.


If you doubt the need to join us in this effort, remember Obama's fascist EPA wants to make it illegal for you to breathe.
http://progressillinois.com/2009/12/9/more-shimkus-idiocy


A CLIMATE CHANGE DENIER MANIFESTO:


A spectre is haunting the world - the spectre of global warming. All the powers of the world, in the name of a one world government, have entered into an unholy alliance to exorcise this false spectre.


Where is the opposition that has not hurled back the branding reproach of "climate change?"


To this end, wingnuts of various nationalities have assembled in Copenhagen and sketched the following manifesto, to be published in the English, French*, German*, Italian*, Flemish* and Danish* languages.


*Well, not really, since we don't know them...and everyone should speak English anyway.


Below, we declare our principles and intentions:


1) I will confuse the scientific use of the word ‘theory’ with its casual meaning.


2) I will search the fringes of science for any instances of uncertainty and generalize it to all science.


3) I will ignore multiple sources of evidence in favor of a columnists’ unfounded claims.


4) I will bring up the 1970’s "global cooling" controversy, as proof that scientists are clueless even though more than six times as many research studies predicted warming.


5) I will find a single quote in thousands of pages of text that can be damning when used without context.


6) I will pick my comparison data from wherever I damn well please, even if it happens to be the hottest year ever.


7) I will pretend that scientists have ignored "natural cycles," because I know the general public doesn’t have the time to read the dozens of studies debunking this claim.


8) I will make up facts and misrepresent data during interviews and op-eds because I know that journalists won’t call me on it.


9) I will deride "qualifications" as elitist.


10) I will repeat fabrications and falsehoods until they become perceived as the truth.


11) I will confound local weather with global climate because, well, it is too darn confusing.


12) When a scientists takes issue with my comments, I will accuse her of being dogmatic and stifling dissent.


13) I will claim that tens of thousands of scientists are in on the hoax so that they can cash in, while hiding my ties to big oil.


14) I will chastise scientists for being apocalyptic fear mongers while claiming that the solution to the non-problem will destroy life as we know it.


15) I will deny warming on even days and deny human impact on odd days.


16) I will shoot the messenger – He invented climate change AND the Internet.



The Right Wing Climategate Conspiracy Deniers conjure up a massive global conspiracy to prevent regulating greenhouse gases, pointing to hacked emails of climate scientists as the smoking-gun evidence that global warming is mere fabrication. If this were true, then the global warming conspiracy started in 1824 when the greenhouse effect was first described by a French scientist and continued throughout the intervening years with the conspiracy passed from one generation to the next perpetuating the fraud through 2009. The conspiracy would include a Swedish chemist in 1896 who wrote about "man-made greenhouse," a British engineer who in 1938 showed temperatures were hotter than the prior century, a US oceanographer and a chemist in 1957 who showed that oceans will not absorb all the CO2, a US scientist that in 1958 commenced "systematic measurements of atmospheric CO2," the U.S. President's advisory committee in 1965 that warned about the greenhouse effect, James Hansen of NASA who warned in 1988 that global warming had commenced, and Margaret Thatcher who warned in 1989 that a global treaty on climate change was imperative. In short, this global conspiracy would include all the scientists, governments, and international bodies that have researched or warned about global warming since 1824. What are these guys a scientific Knights Templar?
.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6729366/Copenhagen-climate-summit-history-of-climate-change.html


The reality is that the emails do not alter the substantive scientific findings.
http://factcheck.org/2009/12/climategate/



Al Gore may be an imperfect messenger...

Posted by: Word Salad from Wasilla | December 14, 2009 4:07 PM

Don't be a denier, Word. Al Gore is a perfect idiot.


http://www.examiner.com/x-25061-Climate-Change-Examiner~y2009m12d14-Al-Gore-makes-embarrassing-mistake-by-severely-misstating-sea-ice-loss-prediction


"Al Gore makes embarrassing mistake by severely misstating sea ice loss prediction"


Those global warming loons will say anything.


Being a Swamp reporter covering Copenhagen must be difficult.
Imagine how hard you have to work to AVOID reporting stories that might shake the faith-based belief in AGW,

For example, this story about yet another Al Gore dumbest-line-of-the-year, reported in the UK Telegraph:
"Speaking at the Copenhagen climate change summit, Mr Gore said new computer modelling suggests there is a 75 per cent chance of the entire polar ice cap melting during the summertime by 2014.

However, he faced embarrassment last night after Dr Wieslav Maslowski, the climatologist whose work the prediction was based on, refuted his claims.

Dr Maslowski, of the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California, told The Times: “It’s unclear to me how this figure was arrived at.

“I would never try to estimate likelihood at anything as exact as this.”"


You will not convince the Republican-Libertarians that there does exist global warming, climate change or even, evolution. They can't accept such ideas because that would prove, positively, that they have been using the good book, for fraudulent reasons. If they accepted such farcical notions, then their bible could no longer, for them, be a source of instruction and guidance. They would have to put away the notion, that, the earth is really a square ! For, as they so well know, doesn't it state in the bible, that God sent his angels, to the four corners of the earth. Come on, boys and girls of the the fraudulent Republican-Libertarians, give the good book a rest for a time. You have been beating us over the head with it for far too long. I don't think the Great Inspirer had that use in mind, when He deign to bless us with such a good book !! Give it up, sheeple, start thinking, that is why God gave us brains, unless, of course, you thought he said "trains", and you missed yours !!
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME, ALIVE AND WHOLE. NOW.


RUT ROW . . .
Climategate TKO in Copenhagen?
*
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/climategate_tko_in_copenhagen.html


RUT ROW #2. KEEP ME POSTED PENN STATE.
*
Sen. Piccola Letter on PSU Prof Michael Mann
*
http://www.scribd.com/doc/23612181/Sen-Piccola-Letter-on-PSU-Prof-Michael-Mann


RUT ROW # 3
*
DOE sends a “litigation hold notice” regarding CRU to employees – asking to “preserve documents”
*
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/14/doe-sends-a-litigation-hold-notice-regarding-cru-to-employees-asking-to-preserve-documents/


AL BORE SWITCHES TO BASEBALL, YOU KNOW LIKE KINDA SORTA BALLPARK "ESTIMATES"
*
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2009/12/15/Gore-admits-climate-figures-ballpark/UPI-37851260887971/


CLIMATE CHANGE IS NATURAL: 100 REASONS WHY
http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/146138


MAKE YOUR OWN HOCKEY STICK, AS EASY AS 1, 2, 3.
*
http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk/2009/12/fables-of-the-reconstruction.html


RUT ROW # WHATEVER LOST COUNT
*

Organized Crime in Charge of EU Carbon Trade, Police Say
*
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17974


I see the missing link is on the loose, again !! I wonder if he will ever find himself or his mind !! Keep it up, Bobby-Booby, let the adults see just how goofy you can get !!
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME, ALIVE AND WHOLE. NOW.


DONNIE DIMWIT: THE CAT IS OUT OF THE BAG. CLIMATEGATE IS BEING EXPOSED FOR THE FRAUD IT IS. DEAL WITH IT.


Tony, over the past few weeks I have posted several links that show that the Antarctic ice cap has risen about 5 percent in the past few years. The Arctic ice cap has shrunk some, though the past couple of winters it has completely frozen over. One cap is growing, the other has shrunk a bit. While Edmonton is quite a bit south of the Actic ice cap, the fact it just recorded an all-time record low of -51 F is nothing to sneeze at. Hmmm, where is that cold air coming from?
Dumb Dumb Janet and the rest, 150 years or recorded data is rather minute compared to the life of this planet. While the 1990s were a warm decade, the 2000s have cooled, with the past two years actually showing planetary cooling. And, as noted over and over again, something called the Little Ice Age ended by the mid 1800s. When an ice age, little or not, ends, it does stand to reason that means temperatures will rise otherwise we would still be in an ice age, little or otherwise.
Oh and I love how ALL the scientists who disagree on man-made global warming are bought and paid for by Exxon! But it's just more derangement from the worthless souls on the Left.
And, Janet, I have no hair on my back. Unfortunately, you cannot say the same.


Little Johnny D,
Again. You don't get it. 2007 was the 2nd warmest year on record. 2008 was the 10th warmest year on record. You repeating that 2008 and 2009 have shown cooling is meaningless when you realize how many recent years have been in the top 10 all time warmest in human record. Riddle me this little Johnny D, in the last 13 years how many have been recorded to be in the top 10 warmest on record?


Da Global am getting warma and yall dont even knows about it


Deniers,

The only thing melting down is the global warming alarmists and Al Gore. Gore is laughable in his make believe world of sky is falling predictions.

Deal with it. Man made global warming is a farce, fronted by the biggest laughingstock on the planet: that BIG BAG OF HOT GAS, AL GORE.


Oh Janet, darling, that is not true. Actually some of the warmest years on record occurred in the 1930s. Furthermore, I do believe that 1913 is the true warmest year on record. 1998 and 1999, as stated over and over, have seen temperature declines, which you do agree with. But somehow the fact that 1998 is cooler than 1997 is lost on you.
I know this link will not be liked and I suppose it was all the creation of Exxon (because after all, Exxon is the most company in the world, well it actually follows Halliburtonn as the most evil), but this link provides ACTUAL information, not made up stuff:

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/16460


But somehow the fact that 1998 is cooler than 1997 is lost on you.


Posted by: John D, still right, as usual | December 15, 2009 6:23 PM
;
No my friend. It is lost on you. What you're saying would be like saying that if Bill Gates was the 2nd richest person in 2007 but in 2008 he was the 10th richest this is proof Bill Gates is poor.
PS I noticed you didn't take the last 13 years and note how many of those 13 have been int he top 10 hottest years on record. Coward!


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "x" in the field below:

Barack Obama

Latest polls

Features

Cartoon

Joe Fournier

Cartoon

The Lowe- Down

Cartoon

Editorial cartoons

McCain

Presidential trivia