Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
by Kathleen Hennessey and Mark Silva
With the House Homeland Security Committee holding a hearing today on the breach of White House security that enabled an uninvited Virginia couple access to a State Dinner, the ranking Republican is calling for subpoenas of both the couple and the White House social secretary, Desiree Rogers, who have declined to appear.
Rep. Peter King of New York, the ranking Republican on the committee, said before the hearing that he will support subpoenas compelling the testimony of Tareq and Michaele Salahi, the uninvited couple who greeted the president and other high level officials at the State Dinner held in the honor of Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
"I also want to subpoena Desiree Rogers,'' King said, dismissing the White House's invoking of executive privilege and keeping Rogers from appearing before the committee.
"I could accept their argument if this was any policy, but this is involves an administrative act by an appointee of the president,'' King said.
The Republican also acknowledged that he had spoken with Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and does not expect the Salahis or Rogers to appear this week.
Thompson said before the hearing that Congress needs to hear from all three, all of whom have declined to appear. Thompson had said Wednesday night that if the Salahis did not appear the committee was prepared to approve subpoenas to compel their testimony.
"This hearing is not about crashing a party at the White House,'' Thompson said. "Nor is it about wannabe celebrities.'' The purpose, he said, is protecting the president.
"The security gaps at issue cannot be explained away as missteps by a few frontline employees,'' Thompson said. "There were undeniable planning and execution failures of the entire Secret Service apparatus. We're all fortunate that this diplomatic celebration did not become a night of horror. ... We must dissect every fact ... and after we do these things, we need to give thanks that no lives were lost.''
Addressing the committee as the sole witness at today's hearing, Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan conceded that "in our judgment, a mistake was made. In our line of work, we cannot afford even one mistake."
Valerie Jarrett, a senior adviser to the president and close friend of Rogers from Chicago -- "I am,'' she said today -- said in an appearance on MSNBC this morning that the White House also has much bigger issues on its plate -- namely the economy.
The White House has made its own inqury and found, "look, we can do better,'' Jarrett said of the security question. "We need to have people at the gate from the White House working in concert with the Secret Service,'' she said. "We have done our own analysis and review and conclusion that we could have done a better job.''
On withholding Rogers from Capitol Hill, Jarrett said: "We think it's important that the president be able to have confidential conversations with his staff... We have done our review... and the person who is principally responsible for making sure that access to the Whtie House is limited,'' Secret Service Director Sullivan, is testifying today.
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina has written, in a memorandum published at the White House website, that he has spoken with Rogers and has ordered new procedures to avert a recurrence of what happened at last week's State Dinner.
" After reviewing our actions, it is clear that the White House did not do everything we could have done to assist the United States Secret Service in ensuring that only invited guests enter the complex,'' Messina wrote. "White House staff were walking back and forth outside between the check points helping guests and were available to the Secret Service throughout the evening, but clearly we can do more, and we will do more.''
From now on, he wrote, "White House staff will be stationed physically at the check points with the United States Secret Service. Guests will be checked off of the list by White House staff and the Secret Service will continue to ensure that all guests have been properly cleared before entering the White House. Guests whose names are not on the guest list will be assisted by White House staff present at the check point for appropriate resolution.''
As always, he noted, the Secret Service will be responsible for security "and remain ultimately responsible for controlling access to the White House complex.''
Wire services contributed to this report.





Comments
Remember Obama's claims to run the "most transparent" administration ever?
House Democrats and Republicans do.
Another Obama pledge thrown under the bus.
Posted by: Former Democrat | December 3, 2009 11:00 AM
Executing executive privelidge for the social director for the White House?????you gotta be kiddin me!Howbout the W.H. chef,tour guide,and the guy who picks up after their dog??????why not exec. privelidges for them too?
Posted by: DammitDonnie | December 3, 2009 11:11 AM
The typos, omissions, scrambled lines, misspellings, awkward constructions and plain bad grammar that have increasingly afflicted the Trib. since its sale have reached a level that makes it nearly too painful to read. Do you even have a style manual any more? If I loaned you my old Strunk and White and a dictionary, would someone use them? Really. It's just embarrassing. Perhaps there's a slot available on the new reality show, "So You Think You Can Edit."
Posted by: mark richard | December 3, 2009 11:54 AM
It's an embarrassment so push it aside and hope people forget quickly.
Spin this like every other embarrassing moment that every other president has endured.
The current occupant of the White House is no better or worse than the last or the one before him or the one before him.
They all make promises they know they can't keep to get elected. They all make mistakes and have staff that make mistakes. They all try thier hardest to cover up the really silly mistakes (like this one), so what?
I'm more concerned about the current president's policies and the direction he's trying to take us than party crashers at the White House.
Posted by: springfield | December 3, 2009 12:15 PM
Looks like the White House is trying to hold back the true story----Make you wonder if someone is lying.
Posted by: Inky | December 3, 2009 12:29 PM
This calls for a Congressional resolution.
Posted by: You Lie! | December 3, 2009 12:46 PM
The typos, omissions, scrambled lines, misspellings, awkward constructions and plain bad grammar that have increasingly afflicted the Trib. since its sale have reached a level that makes it nearly too painful to read. Do you even have a style manual any more? If I loaned you my old Strunk and White and a dictionary, would someone use them? Really. It's just embarrassing. Perhaps there's a slot available on the new reality show, "So You Think You Can Edit."
Posted by: mark richard | December 3, 2009 11:54 AM
Tribune has gone way down suporting Obimbo Socalism.
Not worth reading,,nice time to switch to FOX.
Posted by: Inky | December 3, 2009 3:24 PM
What a defiantly elitist attitute Desiree....Gee Mr Prez I don't about your friends, first Gates now this one. Please enough of the drama, no more friends, they aren't helping you!
svivar9087
Posted by: svivar9087 | December 3, 2009 6:19 PM
These people are all about transparency. We just have to respect that. Actually, my personal Torturer, a pretty Latina, has a very solid Desiree Rodgers xx chromosone thing going on herself. Certainly have to respect that.
Posted by: Django - N Exile In/Around the 30th Parallel | December 3, 2009 11:54 PM
I hope that she ignores every subpoena she receives, just the same way Karl Rove and Harriet Miers blew off every subpoena they received from Congress in the past several years.
Posted by: BC | December 4, 2009 4:23 PM
Desiree Rogers photos http://themapicus.com/desiree-rogers/2.html
Posted by: hashlib | December 4, 2009 7:50 PM