by Mark Silva
The Obama administration is holding a workshop today on open goverment.
It's closed to the public and press.
The workshop is being held by the Justice Department's Office of Information Policy for the public liasons at federal agencies who field requests for records filed under the Freedom of Information Act. The administration, vowing greater "transparency'' about government actions, is outlining procedures for working with a new U.S. Office of Government Information Services, set up to resolve disputes over information requests.
"If they're getting marching orders, why shouldn't the public be there?" asks Jeff Stachewicz, founder of the Washington-based FOIA Group Inc., which files hundreds of requests each month on behalf of companies, law firms and news organizations.
"We'd like to know, when they're training agencies, are they telling them the same thing they're saying in public, that they're committed to making the Freedom of Information Act work well and make sure that agencies are releasing information whenever possible while protecting important issues like individual privacy and national security," said Rick Blum, coordinator of the Sunshine in Government Initiative.
Melanie Ann Pustay, the official running the conference, says she wanted government employees to be able to speak candidly, and the conference is being held in an auditorium at the Commerce Department, where a government ID is required for admittance. The press, however, is routinely admitted to government buildings.
Pustay promises to say the same things at the workshop that she would say publicly, and is seeking to improve how the government responds to information requests, which cost roughly $400 million each year to handle.
As Obama's first year in office ends, his record on issues surrounding the Freedom of Information Act -- one of the principle mechanisms that citizens use to request information -- is uneven so far, the Associated Press reports today, in noting the closed-door conference on open government.
"The government should not keep information confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears," Obama told government offices on his first full day as president.
Just last week, a State Department deputy assistant secretary, Llewellyn Hedgbeth, said at a public conference that "as much as we want to promote transparency," her agency will protect classified materials that put the United States in a bad light.
The Associated Press provided this report.





Comments
Once again, we are asking, no, demanding, that President Obama reverse decades of secrecy and guardedness, in relation to information of our government. As a champion of transparency, he is committed to achieving this, but, give him a chance. He is in the middle of the worst economic mess ever left behind, by a previous administration, in this case, the Bush&Cheney messes !! There is no sense in piling-on, it will do no one, any good, but it may be harmful, in achieving transparency. President Obama is trying to remedy a crisis in healthcare, or as the Republican-Libertarians like to frame it, healthscare, he is trying to find a remedy for the unemployed, given the fact that millions of jobs disappeared during the previous two administrations. So, as you can see, he is focusing on the health of our nation, which includes a transparent government, but he is doing so, brick by brick. As we know, Rome wasn't built in a day, just as, all the messes the Bush&Cheney fringe left behind, it will take some time, to clean up and sanitize !! For, not only were they a dirty gang, they were an incompetent one, as well !!
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME, ALIVE AND WHOLE. NOW.
Posted by: Don Fitzgerald, IL | December 7, 2009 10:29 AM
Read the ChjicagoTribu e editoral on D Rogers , is a good example of of the Obimbo's White House openness.
Posted by: Inky | December 7, 2009 11:48 AM
Imagine there's no Heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today
Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace
You may say that I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one
Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world
You may say that I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one
Posted by: sugar ray | December 7, 2009 12:24 PM
Inky... negative...
Posted by: awake | December 7, 2009 1:09 PM
Obviously this is not really about open-ness as much as it is a way to discuss how to use propaganda and distortion when portraying open-ness.
Posted by: Truth Be Told | December 7, 2009 4:11 PM
Just last week, a State Department deputy assistant secretary, Llewellyn Hedgbeth, said at a public conference that "as much as we want to promote transparency," her agency will protect classified materials that put the United States in a bad light.
Hmmm, i suppose thats the excuse used for keeping falsified climate data from the public?
Posted by: Rex | December 7, 2009 6:17 PM
Inky... negative...
Posted by: awake | December 7, 2009 1:09 PM
Definitely when we have a President at 47% approval.
Posted by: Inky | December 7, 2009 6:28 PM