Massa questions: Who knew what when?: The Swamp
The Swamp
Chicago Tribune
Posted March 11, 2010 1:15 PM
The Swamp

by Mark Silva and updated

Eric Massa may be gone.

But questions about who knew what about the former congressman's alleged misconduct with congressional aides are not.

Amid reports that Democratic leaders may have known earlier than first reported about the alleged conduct of the former Democratic congressman from western New York State, House Republican Leader John Boehner introduced a resolution today calling for an ethics committee investigation of what House leaders knew, when they knew it and what they did about it.

The House voted this afternoon to refer the resolution to the committee, with Democratic leaders quickly acceding to the Republican move to open an inquiry. The vote for referral was 402-1, with 15 voting present (that would be the members of the ethics committee, as is customary.)

"Whereas, numerous confusing and conflicting media reports that House Democratic leaders knew about, and may have failed to handle appropriately, allegations that Rep. Massa was sexually harassing his own employees have raised serious and legitimate questions about what Speaker (Nancy) Pelosi as well as other Democratic leaders and their respective staffs were told, and what those individuals did with the information in their possession,'' the resolution states, noting that all of this has "held the House up to public ridicule.''

This is the text of Rep. Boehner's resolution:


"Whereas, on March 8, 2010, Representative Eric Massa resigned from the House;

Whereas, numerous newspapers and other media organizations reported in the days before and after Mr. Massa's resignation that the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct was investigating allegations that Mr. Massa sexually harassed Members of his congressional staff;

Whereas, on March 3, 2010, Majority Leader Hoyer's office issued a statement saying, "The week of February 8th, a member of Rep. Massa's staff brought to the attention of Mr. Hoyer's staff allegations of misconduct that had been made against Mr. Massa. Mr. Hoyer's staff immediately informed him of what they had been told";

Whereas, on Thursday, March 4, Roll Call newspaper reported, "Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she only learned Wednesday of misconduct allegations against freshman Rep. Eric Massa, though her staff had learned of it earlier and decided against briefing her. 'There had been a rumor, but just that,' Pelosi told reporters at her weekly news conference. 'A one-, two-, three-person rumor that had been reported to Mr. Hoyer's office and reported to my staff which they did not report to me because you know what? This is rumor city. There are rumors.'";

Whereas, on March 11, 2010, The Washington Post reported, "House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office was notified in October by then-Rep. Eric Massa's top aide [Joe Racalto] of concerns about the New York Democrat's behavior";

Whereas, on March 11, 2010, Politico newspaper reported, "Democratic insiders say Pelosi's office took no action after Racalto expressed his concerns about his then-boss in October";

Whereas, on March 9, 2010, The Corning Leader newspaper reported, "Hoyer said last week he told Massa to inform the House Ethics Committee of the charges within 48 hours. 'Steny Hoyer has never said a single word to me, never, not once, not a word,' Massa said Sunday. 'This is a lie. It is a blatant false statement.'";

Whereas, numerous confusing and conflicting media reports that House Democratic leaders knew about, and may have failed to handle appropriately, allegations that Rep. Massa was sexually harassing his own employees have raised serious and legitimate questions about what Speaker Pelosi as well as other Democratic leaders and their respective staffs were told, and what those individuals did with the information in their possession;

Whereas, the aforementioned media accounts have held the House up to public ridicule;

Whereas, the possibility that House Democratic leaders may have failed to immediately confront Rep. Massa about allegations of sexual harassment may have exposed employees and interns of Rep. Massa to continued harassment;

Whereas, clause one of Rule XXXIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, titled "Code of Conduct," states "A Member, Delegate, Resident Commission, officer, or employee of the House shall conduct himself at all times in a manner that shall reflect creditably on the House";

Whereas, the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct is charged under House Rules with enforcing the Code of Conduct;

Therefore, be it RESOLVED,

(1) The Committee on Standards of Official Conduct is directed to investigate fully, pursuant to clause 3(a)(2) of House Rule XI, which House Democratic leaders and members of their respective staffs had knowledge prior to March 3, 2010 of the aforementioned allegations concerning Mr. Massa, and what actions each leader and staffer having any such knowledge took after learning of the allegations;

(2) Within ten days following adoption of this resolution, and pursuant to Committee on Standards of Official Conduct rule 19, the committee shall establish an Investigative Subcommittee in the aforementioned matter, or report to the House no later than the final day of that period the reasons for its failure to do so;

(3) All Members and staff are instructed to cooperate fully in the committee's investigation and to preserve all records, electronic or otherwise, that may bear on the subject of this investigation;

(4) The Chief Administrative Officer shall immediately take all steps necessary to secure and prevent the alteration or deletion of any e-mails, text messages, voicemails and other electronic records resident on House equipment that have been sent or received by the Members and staff who are the subjects of the investigation authorized under this resolution until advised by the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct that it has no need of any portion of said records; and,

(5) The Committee shall issue a final report of its findings and recommendations in this matter no later than June 30, 2010.''

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

At least the Dems get rid of their problems most of the time, that's more than we can say about the corrupt Rethuglicans (David Vitter, Jon Ensign, Mark Sanford).


Apparently Rahm knew something earlier.


Massa said they had a big shouting match....in the shower room.....naked.....no tickling involved. ;)



Story #2 on Massa.

Just keeping score for Bruce.


Good to see the House GOP finally getting some testicular fortitude.


That sound you hear are the wagons circling around Pelosi's office.


The most ethical Congress, EVAH - meh.


Mark Foley, Republican. 37 Swamp stories.
Larry Craig, Republican, 31 Swamp stories.
Eric Massa, Democrat, 2 stories so far.
Thirty-five more to go, Mark.....


Repiglican leadership hears stories of Mark Foley lusting for teen boys. Repiglican leadership remains silent and coddles him like the Catholic Diocese coddles pedophile priests. After mounting public pressure Mark "I dream of teens" Foley resigns.
;
Democratic leadership hears stories of odd adult behavior involving harassment. Ethics investigation begins. Democratic leaders give weird Congressman ultimatum, resign or we will toss you out. Weird Congressman resigns in shame soon after.
;
Yep, yer right Bruce and Bobbie Mobbie. These stories are nearly identical. In one scenario you have coddling and protecting of a teen predator and in the other you have leadership acting responsibly.


Why didn't they get their knickers in a knot over the hesitation to push Rangel out of the chairmanship of the House W&M Committee much sooner? There's been press about his real estate/tax wrongdoings for over a year, and suddenly a sponsored trip tips the scale? Massa, a freshman, is no prince, but his importance to the Hill is minimal. Was Pelosi that perplexed over what to do about Pete Stark?


So NOW Boner wants an investigation?


Never mind that just 48 hours ago Boehner's Republican leadership office was embracing Eric Massa's conspiracy theory and telling people to watch Glenn Beck to find out all about it.


Forget all that, because Republicans are now positioning themselves as the voices of truth and righteous indignation on all matters sexual -- as long as they have to do with former members of Congress....from the Democratic Party.


Next thing you know, Boehner will claim that Massa's resignation was part of a conspiracy to cover up the truth, and he'll hold up Republicans as the paragon of transparency because their sex-scandal plagued incumbents decided to stay in office.


If Republicans want to have a "sex-scandal" debate between the parties, by all means, bring it on...with the widest stance possible. They can scream about Eric Massa's resignation...as long as they explain their incumbents, Vitter, Ensign, and Sanford.



Goodbye and good riddence Massa. I mostly agree with HHH, but I niether party has perfectly clean hands.


I smell a rat.


Everyone knows those guys in the Navy don't do those things Massa was talking about.


And a Chief of Staff would never approach a Member of Congress butt naked and start giving him the Johnson Treatment.


Those things just don't happen.

Larry Craig and Dave Vitter assurmed me of that......

Well, as John Kass pointed out, at least in Chicago the politicians keep their clothes on and their feet to themselves when conducting business.


HHH you can play your moral equivalency games all you want. When you libs dump the rep that was running a whore house and sleeping with the head of the government entity most directly responsible for this economic crisis, then and only then can you cry about someone cheating on his wife.

When you get rid of the tax cheat scum writing tax laws you might have a legitimate comment.

Until then, your defense of Pelosi and the dem leadership, that knew all about this grab happy lib and did nothing about it, is just another example of the completely corrupting effect of a liberal agenda.

Massa was forced out so dems had time to run a new candidate and eliminate a HC no vote. The open question is why now and who's been covering up?


Talk about cleaning up things in DC...Another sex scandal....when will men learn to keep their hands to themselves and their pants zipped and keep after hours pursuits in their own home/favorite bar/whatever.


Maybe that Chicago TV guy (Dave Savini?) should use his blacklight to check and see what is in the congress and senate buildings like he does hotel rooms.


-------------------------------
HHH you can play your moral equivalency games all you want. When you libs dump the rep that was running a whore house and sleeping with the head of the government entity most directly responsible for this economic crisis, then and only then can you cry about someone cheating
Posted by: Hans | March 11, 2010 5:19 PM
---------------------------------


So who's the one playing the "moral equivalency games" now, Hans?


And you're still trying to pass off the Bush Republicans economic meltdown on the minority Dems? HAHAHA! What, did you go to the "Terry and John D school of Economics" or something?



With all the problems facing our country, what an incredible waste of time this witch-hunt is.


Massa, by his own admission, did some sleazy things and he resigned his office. Problem discovered. Problem solved. What purpose, other than politics, is served by examining this further


Triple H.

Who had control of the Congress when the meltdown started? Now think real hard because the adults know the answer do you.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "l" in the field below:

Barack Obama

Latest polls

Features

Cartoon

Joe Fournier

Cartoon

The Lowe- Down

Cartoon

Editorial cartoons

McCain

Presidential trivia