<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>The Swamp</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.swamppolitics.com,2009:/news/politics/blog//79</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=79" title="The Swamp" />
    <updated>2009-11-07T01:52:12Z</updated>
    <subtitle>The latest on what&apos;s happening in Washington and on the campaign trail from the Tribune&apos;s D.C. bureau. </subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
 

<entry>
    <title>Sarah Palin: Gridiron-ready, Frank too</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/sarah_palin_gridironready_fran.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=79/entry_id=136110" title="Sarah Palin: Gridiron-ready, Frank too" />
    <id>tag:www.swamppolitics.com,2009:/news/politics/blog//79.136110</id>
    
    <published>2009-11-06T23:45:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-07T01:52:12Z</updated>
    
    <summary>by Mark Silva Those East Coast media who are always &quot;making things up&apos;&apos; may not be the best friends of Alaskan Sarah Palin, the 2008 Republican nominee for vice president, but Palin is expected at one of the Washington media&apos;s...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Silva</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>by Mark Silva</em></p>

<p>      Those East Coast media who are always "making things up'' may not be the best friends of  Alaskan Sarah Palin, the 2008 Republican nominee for vice president, but Palin is expected at one of the Washington media's most elite gatherings:</p>

<p>   <span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/Palin%20resigns.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/Palin%20resigns.html','popup','width=985,height=1024,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/assets_c/2009/07/Palin resigns-thumb-280x291.jpg" width="280" height="291" alt="Palin resigns.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></a></span></p>

<p>      A winter dinner of the Gridiron Club, that invitation-only assembly of Washington journalists which stages a white-tie evening of Marine Band-accompanied, off-the-record satire in the Capitol each spring ("Ladies are always present,'' the club's old tradition holds, "but reporters never are,"" though that's who's there.): </p>

<p>      Both Palin and Rep. Barney Frank, the Democrat from Massachusetts who could arguably be described as a polar political opposite to the politician from the near-Polar Circle, are booked for the Gridiron's winter dinner in December, a good source tells the Swamp. Another good Gridiron source confirms that Palin has accepted the date.</p>

<p>     So Palin won't be accusing the Swamp of making this up.</p>

<p>      Youbetcha.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Climate change hang-ups: Copenhagen</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/climate_change_hangups_copenha.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=79/entry_id=136109" title="Climate change hang-ups: Copenhagen" />
    <id>tag:www.swamppolitics.com,2009:/news/politics/blog//79.136109</id>
    
    <published>2009-11-06T23:10:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-06T23:13:12Z</updated>
    
    <summary>by Jim Tankersley Perhaps nothing illustrates the challenges of government efforts to curb global warming more than the chain of events that unfolded this week on opposite sides of the Atlantic. In Washington, the Senate environment committee approved sweeping limits...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Silva</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>by Jim Tankersley</em></p>

<p>Perhaps nothing illustrates the challenges of government efforts to curb global warming more than the chain of events that unfolded this week on opposite sides of the Atlantic.</p>

<p>In Washington, the Senate environment committee approved sweeping limits to the United States' emissions of the heat-trapping gases scientists blame for climate change - employing a rare procedural tactic to overcome a Republican boycott of the vote - while a separate trio of senators announced progress in efforts to compose a bipartisan energy and climate bill.</p>

<p>Those efforts were meant, in part, to reassure international leaders preparing for a major climate summit in Copenhagen next month that the United States is serious about emissions cuts. Environmentalists welcomed them as such.</p>

<p> But even as the Senate committee prepared to vote, climate negotiators were publicly lowering expectations for the Copenhagen summit - citing, in large part, the United States' inability to pass a climate bill into law before the talks begin.</p>

<p>The bottom line is this: Neither Congress and the Obama administration nor the negotiators appear likely to finish their climate work by the end of the year.</p>

<p>Instead, analysts here and abroad say, it looks like the Copenhagen negotiators will attempt to settle for something less than a legally binding climate treaty. Perhaps, for instance, a political declaration that includes specific, nation-by-nation targets for emissions cuts and a fixed deadline for turning that declaration into a binding treaty.</p>

<p>Negotiators conceded as much in Barcelona this week, as they met for the final time, formally, before Copenhagen.</p>

<p>"I sense that people are getting into a more realistic place about what we can reasonably accomplish in Copenhagen" - largely because of US and how far along the process is - said Jake Schmidt, international climate policy director for the Natural Resources Defense Council, who attended the Barcelona meeting.<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
Or, as Rear Admiral Neil Morisetti, the United Kingdom's climate security envoy, put it in an interview this week: "It's quite apparent that the very high target we're looking for, the legally binding targets we're looking for in Copenhagen, will elude us. There's still an opportunity for us to get political targets.</p>

<p>"Even the scaled-back goal in Copenhagen could depend on negotiators' read of prospects in the Senate, where the climate bill is stalled behind health care - and perhaps financial regulation overhaul - and still must clear several other committees before Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) brings a final bill to the floor.</p>

<p>The bill's fate rests in the hands of a not-small collection of swing Republicans and Midwest-and-Rust-Belt Democrats, who are working with the White House to see if any climate plan can collect the necessary votes.</p>

<p> Among the issues at play are the depth and speed of the emissions cuts, the support for nuclear power development and whether liberals will consent to increased offshore oil drilling as part of an energy and climate package.</p>

<p>There's also a persistent concern, particularly in manufacturing states, over the potential for U.S. job losses if the United States adopts emissions cuts - and take on higher energy costs as a result - while emerging nations such as China and India  do not.</p>

<p>A global climate treaty could assuage those concerns. But Chinese and Indian leaders, among others, are reluctant to sign on without a concrete American commitment.</p>

<p>And by the way, several developing nations have already dismissed as inadequate the proposal that by all accounts is the deepest-emission-cut scenario possible for a U.S. climate bill: 20 percent below 2005 levels by 2020. Those nations could hold up a treaty, too.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Obama: Flags half-staff for Fort Hood </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/obama_flags_halfstaff_for_fort.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=79/entry_id=136108" title="Obama: Flags half-staff for Fort Hood " />
    <id>tag:www.swamppolitics.com,2009:/news/politics/blog//79.136108</id>
    
    <published>2009-11-06T16:45:34Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-06T17:34:34Z</updated>
    
    <summary>by Mark Silva and updated The president today ordered flags flown at half-staff until Veterans Day in respect for 13 killed and 30 wounded in a shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas. &quot;We don&apos;t know all the answers yet, and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Silva</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>by Mark Silva and updated</em></p>

<p>         The president today ordered flags flown at half-staff until Veterans Day in respect for 13 killed and 30 wounded in a shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas.</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/06/Obama%20in%20Rose%20Garden%20on%20Fort%20Hood.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/06/Obama%20in%20Rose%20Garden%20on%20Fort%20Hood.html','popup','width=728,height=1024,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/06/Obama in Rose Garden on Fort Hood-thumb-320x450.jpg" width="320" height="450" alt="Obama in Rose Garden on Fort Hood.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></a></span></p>

<p>	"We don't know all the answers yet, and I would caution jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts,'' President Barack Obama said today in a Rose Garden appearance.</p>

<p>The lowering of flags will be "a modest tribute to those who lost their lives even as others were preparing to risk their lives for their country,'' Obama said of "one of the worst mass shootings ever to take place'' on a U.S. military base.</p>

<p>The president plans to travel to Texas for memorial services when they are scheduled next week.</p>

<p>      The memorial service will be scheduled for the convenience of the families, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said today, and the president will adjust his schedule around that to attend. The president is scheduled to leave for an annual summit of Pacific-rim nations in Asia on Nov. 11.</p>

<p>	Obama met with FBI Director Robert Mueller and other officials this morning and said, "As we continue to learn more about what happened at Fort Hood, we will continue to provide you updates.''</p>

<p>           The president plans this afternoon to visit Walter Reed Army Medical Center, where the Army-trained psychologist accused of the shootings at Fort Hood worked for six years before assignment to Texas. The White House says the visit to the Army hospital was planned before the shootings.</p>

<p>     <em>  (President Barack Obama pictured above walking out of the Oval Office of the White House to speak in the Rose Garden today. AP photo by Alex Brandon) </em></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>White House: FOX off-limits -- strategist </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/white_house_fox_offlimits_stra.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=79/entry_id=136107" title="White House: FOX off-limits -- strategist " />
    <id>tag:www.swamppolitics.com,2009:/news/politics/blog//79.136107</id>
    
    <published>2009-11-06T16:04:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-06T16:07:03Z</updated>
    
    <summary>by Peter Nicholas At least one Democratic political strategist has gotten a blunt warning from the White House to never appear on Fox News Channel, an outlet that presidential aides have depicted as not so much a news-gathering operation as...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Silva</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>by Peter Nicholas</em></p>

<p>	At least one Democratic political strategist has gotten a blunt warning from the White House to never appear on Fox News Channel, an outlet that presidential aides have depicted as not so much a news-gathering operation as a political opponent bent on damaging the Obama administration. </p>

<p>	Political consultants are a staple of cable television talk shows, analyzing current events based on their own experiences working on campaigns or in government.<br />
 <br />
	One Democratic strategist said that shortly after an appearance on Fox he got a phone call from a White House official telling him not to be a guest on the show again. The call had an intimidating tone, he said.</p>

<p>	The message was, "We better not see you on again,'' said the strategist, who spoke on condition of anonymity so as not to run afoul of the White House. An implicit suggestion, he said, was that "clients might stop using you if you continue.''</p>

<p>	In urging Democratic consultants to spurn Fox, White House officials might be trying to isolate the network and make it appear more partisan. </p>

<p>A boycott by Democratic strategists could also help drive the White House narrative that Fox is a fundamentally different creature than the other TV news networks. For their part, White House officials appear on Fox News  -- but sporadically and with "eyes wide open,'' as one aide put it.</p>

<p>David Plouffe, the president's campaign manager and author of a new campaign book, The Audacity to Win, was scheduled to appear on  Fox's On the Record with Greta Van Susteren last night as he promotes his book. His appearance, pre-empted by the breaking news of the shootings at Fort Hood, Texas, has been rescheduled for Monday.</p>

<p>       White House Communications Director Anita Dunn said Thursday night that she had checked with colleagues who "deal with TV issues'' and they had not told people to avoid Fox. On the contrary, they had urged people to appear on the network, Dunn wrote in an email.</p>

<p>	But Patrick Caddell, a Fox News contributor and a former pollster for Democratic President Jimmy Carter, said he has spoken to Democratic consultants who have been told by the White House to avoid appearances on Fox. He declined to give their names.</p>

<p>	Caddell said he had not gotten that message himself from the White House. "They know better than to tell me anything like that,'' he said.</p>

<p>	Caddell added: "I have heard that they've done that to others in not too subtle ways. I find it appalling. When the White House gets in the business of suppressing dissent and comment, particularly from its own party, it hurts itself.''	</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The White House has taken an aggressive stance toward Fox. When President Obama appeared on five separate talk shows one Sunday in September, he avoided Fox. </p>

<p>	"It would be foolish for us to just treat it like it's CNN, ABC, NBC and CBS,'' said a White House aide. "That doesn't make any sense. That would be like saying we're going to do [interviews] with the news magazines and we're going to do <em>Time, Newsweek </em>and the [conservative] <em>National Review</em>.''</p>

<p>	The aide spoke on condition of anonymity to talk more openly about the White House's thinking.</p>

<p>	Last month, Dunn told CNN that Fox was, in effect, an "arm'' of the Republican Party. Dunn said in an appearance on the rival cable network: "Let's not pretend they're a news network the way CNN is.''</p>

<p>As the dustup played out, Fox's senior vice president of news, Michael Clemente, countered: "Surprisingly, the White House continues to declare war on a news organization instead of focusing on the critical issues that Americans are concerned about like jobs, health care and two wars. ''</p>

<p>Fox's commentators have been sharply critical of the Obama administration. After  the president won the Nobel Peace Prize, Sean Hannity, who has a prime-time show on Fox,  said he got the award for "trashing America.''  </p>

<p>The two sides seemed interested in easing tensions. On Oct. 28, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs met privately with Clemente.</p>

<p>But White House aides haven't changed their underlying view of Fox. </p>

<p>Fox's audience is by far the largest of the cable networks, with an average of more than 2.1 million viewers in prime-time this year.  CNN is second with 932,000 prime-time viewers.</p>

<p>Fox's viewership is not what worries the White House, though. More troubling to White House aides is that other news organizations may uncritically follow stories that Fox has showcased.</p>

<p>The White House aide said: "Where some of the falsehoods become dangerous is when the rest of the media accepts them as fact and reports on them, either out of a desire to tap into Fox's news audience - which you can understand, given where circulation and viewership rates are - or as some sort of knee-jerk fear of being considered liberally biased, which is what conservatives have been saying of the mainstream media for years.''</p>

<p>The White House's pugnacious approach to the network leaves some Democrats troubled. </p>

<p>Don Fowler, a former Democratic National Committee chairman, said in an interview: "This approach is out of sync with my conception of what the Obama administration stands for and what they're trying to do. I think they'll think better of it and this will be a passing phase.''</p>

<p> </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Obama: Walter Reed tour today</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/obama_walter_reed_tour_today.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=79/entry_id=136106" title="Obama: Walter Reed tour today" />
    <id>tag:www.swamppolitics.com,2009:/news/politics/blog//79.136106</id>
    
    <published>2009-11-06T15:45:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-06T15:46:49Z</updated>
    
    <summary>by Mark Silva President Barack Obama plans a stop today at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, where some of the most wounded casualties of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are being treated -- and where the Army psychologist accused...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Silva</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>by Mark Silva</em></p>

<p>      President Barack Obama plans a stop today at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, where some of the most wounded casualties of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are being treated -- and where the Army psychologist accused of killing 13 and wounding 30 at Ft. Hood, Texas, worked for several years before reassignment in Texas.</p>

<p>      The visit was planned before Thursday's shooting -- "horrific,'' the president called it -- according to the White House. Obama's predecessor, President George W. Bush, who ordered the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, was a frequent visitor at Walter Reed, where he often met privately with the wounded and spoke publicly with reporters afterward.</p>

<p>       Obama plans an appearance in the Rose Garden this morning at 11:30 am EST, on this day when unemployment has surpassed 10 percent for the first time in 26 years.</p>

<p>       He wil travel to Walter Reed early this afternoon.</p>

<p>       The accused gunman at Ft. Hood, Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, 39, is an Army-trained psychologist who had worked at Walter Reed. Most recently, he was working at the Darnall Army Medical Center, Ft. Hood's hospital, which has an extensive program to help soldiers cope with the stress of returning from war.</p>

<p>        Hasan, a Virginia native schooled at Virginia Tech, worked at Walter Reed for six years before his transfer to the Texas base in July. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) has said that Hasan was about to be deployed to combat for the first time "and was upset about it." Hasan's cousin, Nadar Hasan, a lawyer in northern Virginia, told Fox News that deployment was his cousin's "worst nightmare."</p>

<p>        At Ft. Hood, which is the nation's largest military installation, base personnel have accounted for more suicides than at any other Army post since the U.S-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, with 75 tallied through this July. Nine of those suicides occurred in 2009, counting two in war zones.</p>

<p>      Three of the four brigades of the 1st Calvary Division based at Ft. Hood are in Iraq. The three brigades -- the first, second and third -- are making their third tour. The division's newest brigade, the fourth, has done two tours in Iraq, returning most recently in June. </p>

<p>      Ft. Hood also is home to three of the brigades of the 4th Infantry Division, now in Afghanistan. The first brigade has done three tours in Iraq, returning most recently in March. The second brigade has also done three tours, returning most recently in September.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Unemployment surpasses 10 percent</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/unemployment_surpasses_10_perc.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=79/entry_id=136105" title="Unemployment surpasses 10 percent" />
    <id>tag:www.swamppolitics.com,2009:/news/politics/blog//79.136105</id>
    
    <published>2009-11-06T14:05:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-06T14:12:57Z</updated>
    
    <summary>by Don Lee The nation&apos;s unemployment rate surged to 10.2 percent in October, reaching double digits for the first time in 26 years, the Labor Department reported today. The unexpected sharp increase, from 9.8 percent in September, came as employers...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Silva</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>by Don Lee</em></p>

<p>The nation's unemployment rate surged to 10.2 percent in October, reaching double digits for the first time in 26 years, the Labor Department reported today.</p>

<p>The unexpected sharp increase, from 9.8 percent in September, came as employers dropped 190,000 workers from their payrolls last month. That was larger than the 175,000 job losses that most forecasters were expecting for the month, and it underscored just how dire the labor market remains despite the recent upturn in the nation's economic output.</p>

<p>Unemployment had been steadily rising in recent months, but the double-digit figure is likely to have a major psychological impact as well as potentially significant consequences in Washington. </p>

<p>"It's an important political threshold," said Robert Reich, the former labor secretary under the Clinton administration who now teaches at the University of California at Berkeley. </p>

<p>With the mid-term elections looming next year, he said, "the 10 percent is going to give Republicans more ammunition to criticize the [Obama] administration and force the hand of the administration to at least appear to be taking additional steps to remedy the situation."</p>

<p>In fact, White House aides, in apparent anticipation of the bad statistical news, said President Obama was scheduled this morning to sign a bill that would extend jobless benefits to the long-term unemployed and expand tax-relief programs for homebuyers and businesses operating at a loss.</p>

<p>The last time the jobless rate crossed double digits was during the recession and initial recovery period of  the early 1980s.  Then, unemployment hit 10.1 percent in September 1982 and stayed at or above that level, rising to a high of 10.8 percent, until June the following year. In the mid-term election in November 1982, then President Ronald Reagan and the Republicans lost control of the House.   </p>

<p>This time around, unemployment has risen even faster and, by some analysts' reckoning, could hover around 10 percent for much longer. The jobless rate at the start of this year was 7.6 percent and it was a mere 4.9 percent in late 2007 when the latest recession officially began. Since then, the number of unemployed workers has increased by 8.2 million to 15.7 million as of October, according to figures compiled by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The labor situation is actually worse than what these figures and the 10.2 percent rate show. The government doesn't count as officially unemployed the so-called discouraged workers who have given up looking for jobs - which in October numbered 808,000, up from 484,000 a year earlier.</p>

<p>There were also 9.3 million people who reported they had little choice but to work part-time because their hours had been cut or they could not find full-time jobs. If this group and discouraged workers are included, along with others on the fringe of the labor market, the nation's unemployment and underemployment rate in October was 17.5 percent.</p>

<p>The unemployment rate is estimated based on the government's monthly survey of about 60,000 households. A separate survey of about 160,000 private and public employers - which many analysts consider more revealing of the job market trends -- showed an employment loss of 190,000 jobs in October. </p>

<p>Since late 2007, payroll employment has fallen by about 7.3 million. Manufacturing and construction have taken the biggest hits, and those industries continued to shed jobs in October. Factory payrolls fell 61,000 over the month, and construction lost 62,000 jobs.</p>

<p>The retail sector, heading into the holiday season, trimmed 40,000 positions last month. </p>

<p>Health-care employment rose 29,000 over the month. And in a potentially significant sign, the temporary help industry, usually a harbinger of broader hiring, added 34,000 jobs last month.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Health care: Public option, more time</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/health_care_public_option_more.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=79/entry_id=136104" title="Health care: Public option, more time" />
    <id>tag:www.swamppolitics.com,2009:/news/politics/blog//79.136104</id>
    
    <published>2009-11-06T12:15:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-06T12:19:49Z</updated>
    
    <summary>by Mark Silva As the House prepares to take the first vote Saturday on the health-care legislation that President Barack Obama is seeking by year&apos;s end, most Americans say they&apos;d be happy with Congress taking more time to either work...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Silva</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>by Mark Silva</em></p>

<p>As the House prepares to take the first vote Saturday on the health-care legislation that President Barack Obama is seeking by year's end, most Americans say they'd be happy with Congress taking more time to either work out minor problems or major changes in the bill.</p>

<p>A slim majority - 53 percent - also say they oppose the president's plans for a health-care and insurance overhaul as they understand them.</p>

<p>Yet a slightly stronger majority - 55 percent --- say they would support a "public option'' plan for health care run by the federal government that competes with private insurers - which has become perhaps the most controversial element of the legislation under debate, with the House and Senate eyeing variations on a public option.</p>

<p>These are among the findings of a CNN/Opinion Research poll released this morning and conducted over the past weekend.</p>

<p>Obama plans to travel to the Capitol on Saturday to meet with the House Democratic caucus, as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) takes the Democratic leadership's plan for health care to the floor for debate and an expected vote. Republicans have lined up against the plan - just as every Republican in the House voted against the economic stimulus plan that the president signed in February.</p>

<p>Americans surveyed are divided on the question of whether the president, who had promised the bridge the partisan divide in Washington, has done enough to work with Republicans in Congress: 49 percent say yes in the CNN survey, 49 percent say no.</p>

<p>Yet the Democratic portrayal of the GOP as "the party of no'' may have taken root as well: Asked if Republicans in Congress have done enough to work with the president, 67 percent say no and only 31 percent say yes.<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
Asked this question: "From everything you have heard or read so far, do you favor or oppose Barack Obama's plan to reform health care?'' a narrow majority say no: 53 percent.  Just  45 percent say they favor his plans, from what they have heard.</p>

<p>A combined 59 percent of those surveyed say they would like Congress to take more time on either minor or major changes to the health-care legislation. That wish could come true: A Senate vote has not been scheduled yet, and the House and Senate will have to reconcile considerable differences over the legislation before anything reaches the president's desk.</p>

<p>The survey of 1,018 adults, including 952 registered voters, was conducted by Opinion Research Corporation on Oct. 30-Nov. 1. The possible margin of error is 3 percentage points.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Obama mourns &apos;horrific&apos; Ft. Hood spree</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/obama_mourns_horrific_ft_hood.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=79/entry_id=136103" title="Obama mourns 'horrific' Ft. Hood spree" />
    <id>tag:www.swamppolitics.com,2009:/news/politics/blog//79.136103</id>
    
    <published>2009-11-05T22:15:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-05T22:15:59Z</updated>
    
    <summary>by Mark Silva President Barack Obama, lamenting &quot;a horrific outburst of violence&apos;&apos; in the killings of a dozen soldiers and wounding of 31 more people at Fort Hood Army Base in Texas today, promised to &quot;stay on this.&apos;&apos; &quot;There has...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Silva</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>by Mark Silva</em></p>

<p>	President Barack Obama, lamenting "a horrific outburst of violence'' in the killings of a dozen soldiers and wounding of 31 more people at Fort Hood Army Base in Texas today, promised to "stay on this.''</p>

<p>	"There has been a tragic shooting at the Fort Hood Army base... We don't yet know all the details at this moment,'' Obama told an assembled audience for an event at the White House. "What we do know is that a number of American soldiers have been killed and even more have been wounded in a horrific outburst of violence.</p>

<p>	"My immediate thoughts and prayers are with the wounded and the families of the fallen,'' the president said. "These are men and women who have made the selfless decision'' to protect the nation. "It is  horrifying that they should come under fire at an Army base on American soil.''</p>

<p>	Obama, who had been informed of the shootings privately this afternoon, offered his first public remarks at the start of an address to a summit of native American tribal leaders meeting at the White House.</p>

<p>	The White House said that the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, FBI and other members of the intelligence community were gathering information and assessing the situation at Fort Hood, where the Army has reported 12  killed and 31 injured today in a series of shootings allegedly started by a soldier.</p>

<p>	"I  would ask all Americans to keep the men and women of Fort Hood in your thoughts and prayers,'' the president said. "We will make sure that we get answers to every possible question about this horrible incident.... </p>

<p>"There is no greater honor, but also no greater responsibility, than for me to make sure that the extraordinary men and women in uniform are properly cared for,'' Obama said. "We are going to stay on this.''</p>

<p>	Obama curtailed his prepared remarks for a tribal assembly that he had addressed in the morning and the returned to this afternoon for closing comments, which offered him the first opportunity to address the Fort Hood shootings in public.<br />
	</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Robert Gibbs: &apos;Jon Voight joke in here&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/robert_gibbs_jon_voight_joke_i.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=79/entry_id=136102" title="Robert Gibbs: 'Jon Voight joke in here'" />
    <id>tag:www.swamppolitics.com,2009:/news/politics/blog//79.136102</id>
    
    <published>2009-11-05T20:25:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-05T20:34:48Z</updated>
    
    <summary>by Mark Silva The White House today was asked for comment on a crowd that assembled on Capitol Hill to protest health-care legislation. &quot;I&apos;m sure there&apos;s a Jon Voight joke in here somewhere, given he was one of the featured...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Silva</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>by Mark Silva</em></p>

<p>        The White House today was asked for comment on a crowd that assembled on Capitol Hill to protest health-care legislation.</p>

<p>       "I'm sure there's a Jon Voight joke in here somewhere, given he was one of the featured speakers,'' White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said of the activist actor who had a few choice words for the White House this week.</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/05/Jon%20Voight%20at%20RNC.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/05/Jon%20Voight%20at%20RNC.html','popup','width=741,height=1024,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/05/Jon Voight at RNC-thumb-320x442.jpg" width="320" height="442" alt="Jon Voight at RNC.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></a></span></p>

<p>         "You're not even going to try and make it?'' a reporter asked.</p>

<p>        "No,'' Gibbs said. "My father always told me my mouth would get me in trouble... And I have a feeling if I acted on the line that (I'd like to give) you, I'm almost positive that it would surely...''</p>

<p>         The crowd of protesters, <a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/bachmann_crown_jewel_of_social.html"><strong>rallied by Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota</strong></a>, wasn't the massive march that some had anticipated. Americans United for Change, the union-backed group backing health-care reform, said the anti-crowd could have filled Ford's Theater. "Pathetic,'' they gloated.</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/05/Gibbs%20awaits%20Obama.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/05/Gibbs%20awaits%20Obama.html','popup','width=818,height=1024,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/05/Gibbs awaits Obama-thumb-320x400.jpg" width="320" height="400" alt="Gibbs awaits Obama.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></a></span></p>

<p>     The Academy Award-winning actor and activist <a href="http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_jon_voight_pawlenty/2009/11/05/282233.html"><strong>Voight had launched a broadside against the president</strong></a> in Minnesota this week, saying that, "We're becoming a socialist nation, and Obama is causing civil unrest in this country. ... I say that they're taking away God's first gift to man: our free will."  He said so at a fundraiser for Gov. Tim Pawlenty's new Freedom First PAC in Minneapolis, part of an exploratory presidential bid. </p>

<p> But Gibbs wasn't biting on his own set-up today.</p>

<p>         "Wait a minute, what have you got against Jon Voight?'' the press pressed, with someone volunteering this offer in the press briefing room of the West Wing:</p>

<p>            "Off-the-record!''</p>

<p>            "Off-the-record,'' mused Gibbs. "I like that.'' </p>

<p>     (<em>Actor Jon Actor Jon Voight, center above, is pictured at the Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minn., last summer. Photo by Chuck Kennedy / MCT. White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs is pictured waiting his turn as President Barack Obama addressed the press briefing today. Photo by Ron Sachs-Pool/Getty Images</em>) </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Census counting all: Citizens or not</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/census_counting_all_citizens_o.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=79/entry_id=136101" title="Census counting all: Citizens or not" />
    <id>tag:www.swamppolitics.com,2009:/news/politics/blog//79.136101</id>
    
    <published>2009-11-05T19:45:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-05T19:44:35Z</updated>
    
    <summary>by Mark Silva The 2010 Census will count the undocumented. Sen. David Vitter, a Louisiana Republican, advanced a plan to prevent the Census Bureau from counting non-citizens in its conduct of the 2010 Census. The Senate&apos;s Democrats blocked that in...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Silva</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>by Mark Silva</em></p>

<p>	The 2010 Census will count the undocumented.</p>

<p>	Sen. David Vitter, a Louisiana Republican, advanced a plan to prevent the Census Bureau from counting non-citizens in its conduct of the 2010 Census.</p>

<p>	The Senate's Democrats blocked that in a 60-39 vote today.</p>

<p>	The Census not only is the basis for apportioning congressional districts for the coming decade, but also becomes a guide for the distribution of billions of dollars in federal aid. Critics complained that Vitter's plan would discourage immigrants from participating in the Census, with law long recognizing that congressional districts are drawn by population. The Constitution calls for a Census is based on the "whole number of persons" residing in a state. </p>

<p>	"The current plan is to reapportion House seats using that overall number, citizens and non-citizens," Vitter said. "I think that's wrong. I think that's contrary to the whole intent of the Constitution and the establishment of Congress as a democratic institution to represent citizens." </p>

<p>           States such as California and Texas would fare worse under the restriction that Vitter was seeking. And Louisiana stands to lose one of its seven House seats in the next round of congressional  reapportionment, the way things stand today.</p>

<p>Census Director Robert Groves opposed the proposal.</p>

<p> "The proposal is just not doable and we would have had to delay the census," Census Bureau spokesman Stephen Buckner said today. "The 2010 census remains on track and on schedule, and we're moving forward to ensure we have an accurate count in 2010." </p>

<p>              Wire services contributed.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Bachmann: &apos;Crown jewel of socialism&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/bachmann_crown_jewel_of_social.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=79/entry_id=136100" title="Bachmann: 'Crown jewel of socialism'" />
    <id>tag:www.swamppolitics.com,2009:/news/politics/blog//79.136100</id>
    
    <published>2009-11-05T18:10:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-05T18:13:38Z</updated>
    
    <summary>by Michael Muskal Conservatives rallied at the Capitol today while Democrats pushed the levers of their majority in the House as Washington and the nation braced for Saturday&apos;s first vote on healthcare reform. Thousands of people listened to Republican lawmakers,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Silva</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>by Michael Muskal</em></p>

<p>Conservatives rallied at the Capitol today while Democrats pushed the levers of their majority in the House as Washington and the nation braced for Saturday's first vote on healthcare reform.</p>

<p>Thousands of people listened to Republican lawmakers, including Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, who has become the face of conservative opposition and one of the principal targets of liberals. "Republicans don't have the votes to kill this bill as we were limited," said the congresswoman, who has called the pending healthcare measure "the crown jewel of socialism."</p>

<p>"But what was unlimited was the voice of the American people," she said. </p>

<p>"Kill the bill, kill the bill," the crowd shouted.</p>

<p>The rally and subsequent lobbying are designed to spur Republicans to oppose the bill, which will be up for a rare Saturday vote in the House.</p>

<p>Top Democrats, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi, braced for the fight to round up the necessary votes. President Barack Obama plans to visit the House on Friday to try to persuade wavering legislators. Majority Leader Steny Hoyer told reporters that he expected the legislation to pass,  though the vote could be tight. </p>

<p>"I wouldn't refer to it as a squeaker, but I think it's going to be close," said Hoyer (D-Md.) "This is a huge undertaking."</p>

<p>Language on abortion and illegal immigrants was still being negotiated, Hoyer said of the bill, estimated to cost more than $1 trilion over 10 years. it still has to be reconciled with a Senate version, with no clear timeline for a Senate vote apparent yet.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Rush Limbaugh: FOX ratings-booster</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/rush_limbaugh_fox_ratingsboost.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=79/entry_id=136099" title="Rush Limbaugh: FOX ratings-booster" />
    <id>tag:www.swamppolitics.com,2009:/news/politics/blog//79.136099</id>
    
    <published>2009-11-05T17:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-05T17:51:48Z</updated>
    
    <summary>by Mark Silva Radio&apos;s Rush Limbaugh is not only good for his own business - with a new eight-year contract offering him the potential to make $400 million. Limbaugh also is good for FOX News. Limbaugh&apos;s appearance on FOX News...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Silva</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>by Mark Silva</em></p>

<p>	Radio's Rush Limbaugh is not only good for his own business - with a new eight-year contract offering him the potential to make <a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/rush_limbaugh_400million_man.html"><strong>$400 million</strong>.</a></p>

<p>	Limbaugh also is good for FOX News.</p>

<p>	Limbaugh's appearance on <em>FOX News Sunday </em>set a record this year in ratings for the network's Sunday morning counterpunch to <em>Meet the Press </em>and the rest.</p>

<p>	Wallace drew  3,892,000 viewers, including 1,180,000 in the coveted 25-54 age group, for the show on the FOX broadcast network and cable FOX News Channel (2.35 million tuned in at FNC.)</p>

<p>Combined, that topped NBC News'  <em>Meet the Press </em>on NBC and MSNBC combined , with 3,554,000 and 1,169,000 ages 25-54, according to Nielsen Media Research.</p>

<p> CBS News' <em>Face the Nation </em>and ABC News'<em> This Week </em>don't have similar cable outlets, but the FOX News Sunday combo on broadcast and cable surpassed them as well.</p>

<p> "I'm a - a guy who earns a percentage of what I generate every year,'' Limbaugh told Wallace in the interview that aired Sunday. "There are some guarantees, but the $400 million is not guaranteed. I have to earn that. So far...I could - I'm ahead of schedule, in fact..</p>

<p>"You're worth whatever your value is,'' he said, asked by Wallace to justify that sort of salary, "and that's determined by what somebody's willing to pay you for. And the only reason I get that money is because the people who invest in me get results beyond their expectations."</p>

<p>And for Wallace, who declined to discuss his own salary when we spoke with him about his <a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/12/chris_wallace_in_the_postrusse.html"><strong>fifth anniversary at FOX News Sunday</strong></a>, Limbaugh was box office Sunday.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>AARP backs House&apos;s health-care bill</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/aarp_backs_houses_healthcare_b.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=79/entry_id=136098" title="AARP backs House's health-care bill" />
    <id>tag:www.swamppolitics.com,2009:/news/politics/blog//79.136098</id>
    
    <published>2009-11-05T17:15:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-05T18:40:19Z</updated>
    
    <summary>by Noam N. Levey As House Democrats prepare to vote Saturday on a sweeping bill to overhaul the nation&apos;s healthcare system, they picked up an important endrosment this morning from the 40-million member AARP, the nation&apos;s largest senior citizens group....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Silva</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>by Noam N. Levey</em></p>

<p>As House Democrats prepare to vote Saturday on a sweeping bill to overhaul the nation's healthcare system, they picked up an important endrosment this morning from the 40-million member AARP, the nation's largest senior citizens group.</p>

<p>The group, which has been pushing for a health overhaul for more than a year, had withheld a formal endorsement of any of the healthcare bills being developed by congressional Democrats.</p>

<p>But today, AARP executive vice president Nancy LeaMond said the group saw the House Democratic bill as the most promising proposal.</p>

<p>"We can say with confidence that it meets our priorities for protecting Medicare, providing more affordable insurance for 50 to 64-year-olds and reforming our healthcare system," she said at the group's Washington headquarters.</p>

<p>The AARP's backing counters mounting opposition among employer groups who are stepping up their advertising campaign against the House Democratic bill. And it comes on a day when other influential groups are swinging their weight behind the healthcare legislation.</p>

<p>    On Tuesday, the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network announced its endorsment of the House bill. The American Medical Association, the nation's largest doctors group, also announced it support today.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Pelosi: Health care has two more votes</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/pelosi_health_care_has_two_mor.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=79/entry_id=136097" title="Pelosi: Health care has two more votes" />
    <id>tag:www.swamppolitics.com,2009:/news/politics/blog//79.136097</id>
    
    <published>2009-11-05T16:45:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-05T16:45:48Z</updated>
    
    <summary>by Mark Silva For House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who plans to take a health-care overhaul to the floor of the House on Saturday, this week&apos;s elections meant one thing: Two more votes. With the elections of Democrats John Garamendi in...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Silva</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>by Mark Silva</em></p>

<p>     For House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who plans to take a health-care overhaul to the floor of the House on Saturday, this week's elections meant one thing:</p>

<p>     Two more votes.</p>

<p>     With the elections of Democrats John Garamendi in California -- he will be sworn in today -- and Bill Owens in New York -- he will be sworn in on Friday -- the House speaker says the party's hand has only been strengthened in elections which cost the party two governor's offices, in Virginia and in New Jersey, this week.</p>

<p>     "Tuesday night, we won two more votes for health care,'' Pelosi (D-Calif.) said at a press availability today. "I'm very proud of that because in both of  those campaigns, health care was the issue.'''</p>

<p>      In the 23rd Congressional District of New York, where the Republican candidate withdrew and endorsed the Democrat after several conservatives rallied around a third-party candidate, Pelosi points to ads that were run against the health-care initiative.</p>

<p>       "And our candidate endorsed our bill,'' Pelosi said of Owens.</p>

<p>      In California, she said, "John Garamendi was elected in a big victory that was higher than Democratic performance in the district.  Again the issue was health care, which was under attack and which produced a great victory for our agenda.''<br />
   <br />
      Critics have challenged the House leadership's health-care bill, which runs nearly 2,000 pages and weighs 20 pounds. But Pelosi says he has "pages and pages of<br />
 supporters for this legislation.'' That includes the American  College of Surgeons, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the  American College of Physicians, the Academy of Pediatrics, the American Nurses Association, "to name a few.''</p>

<p>        The AARP also announced its support for the House bill,</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>McCain: &apos;Past angry&apos; on Afghanistan</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/mccain_past_angry_on_afghanist.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=79/entry_id=136096" title="McCain: 'Past angry' on Afghanistan" />
    <id>tag:www.swamppolitics.com,2009:/news/politics/blog//79.136096</id>
    
    <published>2009-11-05T15:30:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-05T16:04:23Z</updated>
    
    <summary>by Mark Silva Republican Sen. John McCain, who has been urging the White House to support a significant new troop deployment in Afghanistan, says he is &quot;past being a bit angry.&apos;&apos; &quot;I&apos;m disappointed that we haven&apos;t made a decision,&apos;&apos; McCain...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Silva</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>by Mark Silva</em></p>

<p>    Republican Sen. John McCain, who has been urging the White House to support a significant new troop deployment in Afghanistan, says he is "past being a bit angry.''</p>

<p>   "I'm disappointed that we haven't made a decision,'' McCain (R-Ariz.), said in an appearance on <em>FOX & Friends </em>this morning. "The fact is, we already have men and women over there, and, the longer we delay in sending them the needed resources they need, the greater danger they are in. And, that is just a fundamental fact of warfare."</p>

<p>   President Barack Obama is considering the recommendations of Gen. Stanley McChrystal for a deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops in Afghanistan. The president has met for weeks with senior military and national security advisers, and plans to leave Nov. 11 for an annual APEC summit in Asia.<br />
 <br />
     McCain, who challenged Obama for the White House, has been urging him publicly to accept McChrystal's strategy for the way forward after eight years of war in Afghanistan, where the U.S. already has deployed nearly 70,000 troops, including a boost of 21,000 this year</p>

<p>      "I am past being a bit angry, I am just very disappointed,'' McCain said today. "I hope the president will make the right decision soon and believe me I also want to emphasize, half measures won't work." </p>

<p>       Former Vice President Dick Cheney has been even more outspoken about the White House's decision-making, accusing <a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/10/cheney_obama_dithering_in_afgh.html"><strong>Obama of "dithering'' </strong></a>with the decision." What Vice President Cheney calls dithering,'' White House spokesman Robert Gibbs has said, "President <a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/10/obamas_afghan_dillemma_difficu.html"><strong>Obama calls his solemn responsibility </strong></a>to the men and women in uniform and the American public. I think we've all seen what happens when somebody doesn't take that responsibility serious.''     </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Obama senior adviser David Axelrod and others have said that the president is taking time with a consideration which would not result in any immediate deployment even if it were authorized. The White House has been considering a number of factors, including the fitness of the government in Afghanistan, where the presidential election was settled only this week with the withdrawal of a challenger to President Hamid Karzai.</p>

<p>     "I appreciate Mr. Axelrod's talents,'' said McCain, a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy and retired Naval pilot who was imprisoned in Vietnam for five and a half years. "I don't know what his credentials on military deployments are, but the fact is that every day you delay will be another day until they get there and that's just an indisputable fact." <br />
 <br />
"The signal we send to our allies with this delay and the signals we send to our enemies as to whether we will be steadfast,'' McCain said. "The other countries over there, if we leave the neighborhood, they have to stay in the neighborhood and accommodate.</p>

<p>   " I just hope the president will make the right decision soon,'' the Republican senator said. "I intend to support him when he does."<br />
 <br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 
